• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Standing on the Shoulder of Power, Representation and Relational Trust; A Response to Recent Commentaries.

作者信息

Kothari Anita, Ganann Rebecca, Scurr Tiffany N, Sibbald Shannon L

机构信息

School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Health Science, School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8695. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8695. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8695
PMID:39620541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365068/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Standing on the Shoulder of Power, Representation and Relational Trust; A Response to Recent Commentaries.站在权力、代表性和关系信任的肩膀上；对近期评论的回应。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8695. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8695. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust.厘清承诺的与实际提供的诱因的影响：关系型和交易型契约要素以及信任的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1367-81. doi: 10.1037/a0012851.
3
Patient Decision Making Related to Maternal and Childhood Vaccines: Exploring the Role of Trust in Providers Through a Relational Theory of Power Approach.患者在母婴和儿童疫苗方面的决策：通过权力关系理论探讨对提供者的信任在其中的作用。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):449-456. doi: 10.1177/1090198120915432. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
My Early Relational Trust-Informed Learning (MERTIL) for Parents: A study protocol for a brief, universal, online, preventative parenting program to enhance relational health.我的早期关系信任启发式学习（MERTIL）父母版：一项简短、普遍、在线、预防性质的父母养育计划，旨在增强亲子关系健康，研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0272101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272101. eCollection 2023.
5
Behavior analysis, relational frame theory, and the challenge of human language and cognition: A reply to the commentaries on relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition.行为分析、关系框架理论与人类语言和认知的挑战：对关系框架理论相关评论的回应：一种后斯金纳派的人类语言与认知阐释
Anal Verbal Behav. 2003;19:39-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03392981.
6
Reply to Wu and Wilkes: Power, whether situational or durable, decreases both relational and generalized trust.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 15;113(11):E1418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524382113. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Residential mobility and psychological transformation in China: From relational to institutional trust.中国的居住流动性与心理转变：从关系信任到制度信任
Psych J. 2024 Feb;13(1):90-101. doi: 10.1002/pchj.693. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
From the general to the specific: How social trust motivates relational trust.从一般到具体：社会信任如何激发关系信任。
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:16-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
9
Couples therapy and the challenges of building trust, fairness, and justice.
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13072. doi: 10.1111/famp.13072. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
Tailoring midwifery care to women's needs in early labour: The cultivation of relational care in free-standing birth centres.定制助产护理以满足妇女早期分娩需求：独立分娩中心中关系型护理的培养。
Midwifery. 2025 Jan;140:104202. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104202. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Grappling With the Inclusion of Patients and the Public in Consensus Building: A Commentary on Inclusion, Safety, and Accessibility Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".应对将患者和公众纳入共识构建的挑战：对“评估公众参与协商对话：单案例研究”的纳入、安全性和可及性评论的评论。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7715. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7715. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
2
Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".增强多元认知 评“评估参与式对话的公众参与：一项单案例研究”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7776. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7776. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
3
How to Account for Asymmetries in Deliberative Dialogues Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".如何解释协商对话中的非对称性 评“评估协商对话中的公众参与：一个单一案例研究”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7701. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7701. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.评价公众参与审议式对话：一项单案例研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2638-2650. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6588. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.运用定性健康研究方法，改善患者及公众对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.
6
Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making.协商对话作为健康系统决策中知识转化和交流的机制。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1938-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Perception of neighborhood disorder and health service usage in a Canadian sample.加拿大样本中邻里混乱感与卫生服务利用的关系
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Apr;43(2):162-72. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9310-0.
8
Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women.谈、信、时：一项纵向研究评估暴力侵害妇女问题研究的知识转化和交流过程。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 6;6:102. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-102.