School of Population and Public Health, School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7826. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7826. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
In their paper, Tama and colleagues observe that one key challenge in a pilot, multi-component intervention to strengthen health facility regulation was the reaction from health facility owners and providers to regulatory processes. In this commentary, we propose that future research and action on health facility regulation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) contexts adopt an explicit focus on addressing the role of interests and interest groups in health systems 'hardware' and 'software.' Research on policy processes in LMICs consist of fewer investigations into the political economy of national or sub-national interest groups, such as physician associations or associations of health facility owners. A growing body of literature explores supply-side and demand-side interest groups, power relations within and between these stakeholders, and their advocacy approaches within LMIC health sector policy processes. We posit that such analyses will also help identify facilitators and challenges to implementation and scale-up of similar reforms to health facility regulation.
在他们的论文中,Tama 及其同事观察到,在一项针对加强卫生机构监管的试点多组分干预措施中,一个关键挑战是卫生机构所有者和提供者对监管流程的反应。在这篇评论中,我们建议未来在中低收入国家(LMICs)背景下对卫生机构监管进行研究和采取行动,明确关注利益和利益集团在卫生系统“硬件”和“软件”中的作用。在 LMICs 的政策过程研究中,对国家或次国家利益集团(如医师协会或卫生机构所有者协会)的政治经济学的调查较少。越来越多的文献探讨了供应方和需求方利益集团、这些利益相关者内部和之间的权力关系,以及它们在 LMIC 卫生部门政策过程中的倡导方法。我们假设,此类分析还有助于确定在实施和扩大类似卫生机构监管改革方面的促进因素和挑战。