• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interest Groups and Health Facility Regulation - Future Directions for Health Policy and Systems Research Comment on "What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms".利益集团与医疗机构监管 - 卫生政策和体系研究的未来方向 述评:“成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚医疗机构监管改革试点实施情况的定性评估”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7826. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7826. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Regulatory Reforms for Health Facilities: Can These Suffice? Comment on "What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms".卫生机构监管改革:这些措施是否足够?评“成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚卫生机构检查改革试点实施的定性评估”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7265. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7265. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms.成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚医疗机构检查改革试点实施情况的定性评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1852-1862. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.90. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
What Might Be Required for Inspections to Be Considered Fair? Comment on "What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms".检查要被认为是公平的,可能需要什么?评“成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚医疗机构检查改革试点实施的定性评估”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7296. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7296. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
5
Challenges in policy reforms for non-communicable diseases: the case of diabetes in Kenya.政策改革在非传染性疾病方面面临的挑战:以肯尼亚的糖尿病为例。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1611243. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1611243.
6
How much does effective health facility inspection cost? An analysis of the economic costs of Kenya's Joint Health Inspection innovations.有效的卫生机构检查需要花费多少成本?肯尼亚联合卫生检查创新的经济成本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 14;22(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08727-3.
7
An assessment of opportunities and challenges for public sector involvement in the maternal health voucher program in Uganda.评估乌干达公共部门参与母婴健康代金券计划的机遇和挑战。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Oct 18;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-38.
8
The autonomy of public health facilities in decentralised contexts: insights from applying a complexity lens in Kenya.去中心化背景下公共卫生机构的自主性:肯尼亚应用复杂性视角的见解。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010260.
9
Systems, supplies, and staff: a mixed-methods study of health care workers' experiences and health facility preparedness during a large national cholera outbreak, Kenya 2015.系统、供应品和人员:2015 年肯尼亚大规模全国霍乱疫情期间医护人员的经历和卫生机构准备情况的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5584-5.
10
The effect of Kenya's free maternal health care policy on the utilization of health facility delivery services and maternal and neonatal mortality in public health facilities.肯尼亚免费孕产妇保健政策对公共卫生设施中利用卫生机构分娩服务以及孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1708-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Crying baby gets the milk? The governmentality of grievance redressal for patient rights violations in Karnataka, India.哭闹的婴儿有奶吃?印度卡纳塔克邦针对侵犯患者权利行为的申诉补救的治理。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008626.
2
How conflicts of interest hinder effective regulation of healthcare: an analysis of antimicrobial use regulation in Cambodia, Indonesia and Pakistan.利益冲突如何阻碍医疗保健的有效监管:以柬埔寨、印度尼西亚和巴基斯坦的抗菌药物使用监管为例的分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008596.
3
What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms.成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚医疗机构检查改革试点实施情况的定性评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1852-1862. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.90. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
When Doctors strike: Making Sense of Professional Organizing in Kenya.当医生罢工:理解肯尼亚的专业组织。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Aug 1;46(4):653-676. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8970867.
5
A Draconian Law: Examining the Navigation of Coalition Politics and Policy Reform by Health Provider Associations in Karnataka, India.一项严厉的法律:审视印度卡纳塔克邦医疗服务提供者协会的联盟政治与政策改革之道。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Aug 1;46(4):703-730. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8970895.
6
Innovation in regulation of rapidly changing health markets.快速变化的健康市场监管方面的创新。
Global Health. 2014 Jun 24;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-53.
7
Using stakeholder analysis to support moves towards universal coverage: lessons from the SHIELD project.利用利益相关者分析支持全民覆盖的举措:SHIELD 项目的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 1:i64-76. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs007.
8
Building the field of health policy and systems research: framing the questions.构建卫生政策和体系研究领域:确定研究问题。
PLoS Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):e1001073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001073. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
9
The politics of health sector reform in developing countries: three cases of pharmaceutical policy.发展中国家卫生部门改革的政治:三个制药政策案例
Health Policy. 1995 Apr-Jun;32(1-3):47-77. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00728-b.

利益集团与医疗机构监管 - 卫生政策和体系研究的未来方向 述评:“成功监管的背后是什么?肯尼亚医疗机构监管改革试点实施情况的定性评估”

Interest Groups and Health Facility Regulation - Future Directions for Health Policy and Systems Research Comment on "What Lies Behind Successful Regulation? A Qualitative Evaluation of Pilot Implementation of Kenya's Health Facility Inspection Reforms".

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7826. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7826. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7826
PMID:37579407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10461866/
Abstract

In their paper, Tama and colleagues observe that one key challenge in a pilot, multi-component intervention to strengthen health facility regulation was the reaction from health facility owners and providers to regulatory processes. In this commentary, we propose that future research and action on health facility regulation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) contexts adopt an explicit focus on addressing the role of interests and interest groups in health systems 'hardware' and 'software.' Research on policy processes in LMICs consist of fewer investigations into the political economy of national or sub-national interest groups, such as physician associations or associations of health facility owners. A growing body of literature explores supply-side and demand-side interest groups, power relations within and between these stakeholders, and their advocacy approaches within LMIC health sector policy processes. We posit that such analyses will also help identify facilitators and challenges to implementation and scale-up of similar reforms to health facility regulation.

摘要

在他们的论文中,Tama 及其同事观察到,在一项针对加强卫生机构监管的试点多组分干预措施中,一个关键挑战是卫生机构所有者和提供者对监管流程的反应。在这篇评论中,我们建议未来在中低收入国家(LMICs)背景下对卫生机构监管进行研究和采取行动,明确关注利益和利益集团在卫生系统“硬件”和“软件”中的作用。在 LMICs 的政策过程研究中,对国家或次国家利益集团(如医师协会或卫生机构所有者协会)的政治经济学的调查较少。越来越多的文献探讨了供应方和需求方利益集团、这些利益相关者内部和之间的权力关系,以及它们在 LMIC 卫生部门政策过程中的倡导方法。我们假设,此类分析还有助于确定在实施和扩大类似卫生机构监管改革方面的促进因素和挑战。