Suppr超能文献

在治疗急性心力衰竭期间,肺部超声改善充血的预后价值因入院时患者特征而异。

The prognostic value of improving congestion on lung ultrasound during treatment for acute heart failure differs based on patient characteristics at admission.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2024 Feb;83(2):121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasound congestion scoring (LUS-CS) is a congestion severity biomarker. The BLUSHED-AHF trial demonstrated feasibility for LUS-CS-guided therapy in acute heart failure (AHF). We investigated two questions: 1) does change (∆) in LUS-CS from emergency department (ED) to hospital-discharge predict patient outcomes, and 2) is the relationship between in-hospital decongestion and adverse events moderated by baseline risk-factors at admission?

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of 933 observations/128 patients from 5 hospitals in the BLUSHED-AHF trial receiving daily LUS. ∆LUS-CS from ED arrival to inpatient discharge (scale -160 to +160, where negative = improving congestion) was compared to a primary outcome of 30-day death/AHF-rehospitalization. Cox regression was used to adjust for mortality risk at admission [Get-With-The-Guidelines HF risk score (GWTG-RS)] and the discharge LUS-CS. An interaction between ∆LUS-CS and GWTG-RS was included, under the hypothesis that the association between decongestion intensity (by ∆LUS-CS) and adverse outcomes would be stronger in admitted patients with low-mortality risk but high baseline congestion.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years, GWTG-RS 36, left ventricular ejection fraction 36 %, and ∆LUS-CS -20. In the multivariable analysis ∆LUS-CS was associated with event-free survival (HR = 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97), while discharge LUS-CS (HR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.54-1.84) did not add incremental prognostic value to ∆LUS-CS alone. As GWTG-RS rose, benefits of LUS-CS reduction attenuated (interaction p < 0.05). ∆LUS-CS and event-free survival were most strongly correlated in patients without tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, hyponatremia, uremia, advanced age, or history of myocardial infarction at ED/baseline, and those with low daily loop diuretic requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in ∆LUS-CS during AHF treatment was most associated with improved readmission-free survival in heavily congested patients with otherwise reassuring features at admission. ∆LUS-CS may be most useful as a measure to ensure adequate decongestion prior to discharge, to prevent early readmission, rather than modify survival.

摘要

背景

肺部超声充血评分(LUS-CS)是一种充血严重程度的生物标志物。BLUSHED-AHF 试验证明了在急性心力衰竭(AHF)中 LUS-CS 指导治疗的可行性。我们研究了两个问题:1)从急诊科(ED)到出院时 LUS-CS 的变化(∆)是否可以预测患者的结局,2)基线入院风险因素是否调节了住院期间充血消退与不良事件之间的关系?

方法

我们对 BLUSHED-AHF 试验中 5 家医院的 128 名患者的 933 次观察结果进行了二次分析,这些患者在住院期间每天接受肺部超声检查。将 ED 到达至住院出院时的 LUS-CS 变化(范围-160 至+160,负值=充血改善)与 30 天死亡/因 AHF 再次入院的主要结局进行比较。使用 Cox 回归来调整入院时的死亡率风险[Get-With-The-Guidelines HF 风险评分(GWTG-RS)]和出院时的 LUS-CS。我们还纳入了 LUS-CS 变化与 GWTG-RS 之间的交互作用,假设在低死亡率但基线充血严重的入院患者中,充血消退强度(通过 LUS-CS 变化)与不良结局之间的关联更强。

结果

中位年龄为 65 岁,GWTG-RS 为 36,左心室射血分数为 36%,LUS-CS 变化为-20。多变量分析显示,LUS-CS 变化与无事件生存相关(HR=0.61;95%CI:0.38-0.97),而出院时的 LUS-CS(HR=1.00;95%CI:0.54-1.84)单独对 LUS-CS 变化没有增加额外的预后价值。随着 GWTG-RS 的升高,LUS-CS 降低的益处减弱(交互作用 p<0.05)。在没有 ED/基线时心动过速、呼吸急促、低血压、低钠血症、尿毒症、高龄或心肌梗死史且每日使用利尿剂需求较低的患者中,LUS-CS 变化与无事件生存的相关性最强。

结论

在 AHF 治疗过程中,LUS-CS 的降低与入院时情况良好但充血严重的患者再入院无事件生存率的提高最相关。在出院前确保充分充血消退时,LUS-CS 可能最有用,以防止早期再入院,而不是改善生存。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Acute heart failure.急性心力衰竭。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Mar 5;6(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验