Li X T, Yao Y, Zheng R J, Deng Z R, Dong H, Lu X B
Infection and Liver Disease Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Infectious Disease (Viral Hepatitis) Clinical Medical Research Center, Urumqi 830000, China.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 20;31(7):736-741. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230228-00083.
To investigate how plasma exchange (PE) and double plasma molecular adsorption combined with half-volume plasma exchange (DPMAS + half-volume PE) affect the curative effect and short-term survival rate in liver failure. Data from 181 cases of liver failure caused by different etiologies from January 1, 2017 to September 31, 2020, were selected. Patients were divided into a PE treatment alone group and a DPMAS + half-dose PE treatment group. The laboratory indicators with different models of artificial liver before and after treatment and the survival rates of 7, 14, 28, and 90 days after discharge were observed in the two groups. Measurement data were analyzed by t-tests and rank sum tests. Categorical data were analyzed by (2) test. Non-biological artificial liver therapy with different models improved the liver and coagulation function in the two groups of patients with liver failure ( < 0.05 in PTA% intra-group). The coagulation function was significantly improved in the PE treatment alone group compared with that in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group [PT after treatment: (20.15 ± 0.88) s in the PE treatment alone group, (23.43 ± 1.02) s, = -2.44, = 0.016 in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group; PTA: 44.72% ± 1.75% in the PE treatment alone group, 35.62% ± 2.25%, = 3.215 = 0.002 in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group]. Bilirubin levels were significantly decreased in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group compared to the PE treatment alone group [total bilirubin after treatment: (255.30 ± 15.64) μmol/L in the PE treatment alone group, (205.46 ± 9.03) μmol/L, = 2.74, = 0.07 in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group; direct bilirubin after treatment: (114.74 ± 7.11) μmol/L in the PE treatment alone group, (55.33 ± 3.18) μmol/L, = 7.54, < 0.001) in the DPMAS + half-dose PE group]. However, there was no significant effect on leukocytes and neutrophils after treatment with different models of artificial liver ( > 0.05) in the two groups, and platelets decreased after treatment, with no statistically significant difference between the groups ( = -0.15, = 0.882). The inflammatory indexes of the two groups improved after treatment with different models of artificial liver ( < 0.05], and the 28 and 90 d survival rates were higher in the DPMAS+half-dose PE group than those of the PE treatment alone group (28 d: 60.3% vs. 75.0%, (2) = 4.315, = 0.038; 90 d: 56.2% vs. 72.5%. (2) = 10.355 < 0.001). DPMAS + half-dose PE group plasma saving was 1385 ml compared with PE treatment alone group ( = -7.608, < 0.05). Both DPMAS+half-dose PE and PE treatment alone have a certain curative effect on patients with liver failure. In DPMAS+half-dose PE, the 28-day survival rate is superior to PE treatment alone, and it saves plasma consumption and minimizes blood use in clinic.
探讨血浆置换(PE)及双重血浆分子吸附联合半量血浆置换(DPMAS + 半量PE)对肝衰竭疗效及短期生存率的影响。选取2017年1月1日至2020年9月31日因不同病因导致的181例肝衰竭患者的数据。将患者分为单纯PE治疗组和DPMAS + 半量PE治疗组。观察两组治疗前后不同模式人工肝的实验室指标及出院后7天、14天、28天和90天的生存率。计量资料采用t检验和秩和检验分析。计数资料采用χ²检验分析。不同模式的非生物人工肝治疗均改善了两组肝衰竭患者的肝脏及凝血功能(组内PTA%,P < 0.05)。单纯PE治疗组与DPMAS + 半量PE组相比,凝血功能改善更显著[治疗后PT:单纯PE治疗组为(20.15 ± 0.88)s,DPMAS + 半量PE组为(23.43 ± 1.02)s,t = -2.44,P = 0.016;PTA:单纯PE治疗组为44.72% ± 1.75%,DPMAS + 半量PE组为35.62% ± 2.25%,t = 3.215,P = 0.002]。与单纯PE治疗组相比,DPMAS + 半量PE组胆红素水平显著降低[治疗后总胆红素:单纯PE治疗组为(255.30 ± 15.64)μmol/L,DPMAS + 半量PE组为(205.46 ± 9.03)μmol/L,t = 2.74,P = 0.07;治疗后直接胆红素:单纯PE治疗组为(114.74 ± 7.11)μmol/L,DPMAS + 半量PE组为(55.33 ± 3.18)μmol/L,t = 7.54,P < 0.001]。然而,不同模式人工肝治疗后两组白细胞和中性粒细胞无显著变化(P > 0.05),且治疗后血小板均下降,组间差异无统计学意义(t = -0.15,P = 0.882)。不同模式人工肝治疗后两组炎症指标均改善(P < 0.05),DPMAS + 半量PE组28天和90天生存率高于单纯PE治疗组(28天:60.3%对75.0%,χ² = 4.315,P = 0.038;90天:56.2%对72.5%,χ² = 10.355,P < 0.001)。与单纯PE治疗组相比,DPMAS + 半量PE组节约血浆1385 ml(t = -7.608,P < 0.05)。DPMAS + 半量PE和单纯PE治疗对肝衰竭患者均有一定疗效。DPMAS + 半量PE的28天生存率优于单纯PE治疗,且节约血浆消耗,临床用血最少。