• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of plasma exchange, double plasma molecular adsorption system, and their combination in treating acute-on-chronic liver failure.血浆置换、双重血浆分子吸附系统及其联合治疗慢加急性肝衰竭的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520932053. doi: 10.1177/0300060520932053.
2
Therapeutic effect of double plasma molecular adsorption system and sequential half-dose plasma exchange in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.双重血浆分子吸附系统与序贯半量血浆置换治疗乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者的疗效
J Clin Apher. 2019 Aug;34(4):392-398. doi: 10.1002/jca.21690. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Comparative efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system combined with plasma exchange versus plasma exchange in treating acute-on-chronic liver failure due to hepatitis B: A meta-analysis.双重血浆分子吸附系统联合血浆置换与单纯血浆置换治疗乙型肝炎相关慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Apher. 2024 Aug;39(4):e22140. doi: 10.1002/jca.22140.
4
[Plasma exchange combined with double plasma absorption therapy improve the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure].血浆置换联合双重血浆吸附疗法改善慢性重型肝炎的预后
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 20;26(10):744-749. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.10.003.
5
Sequential versus mono double plasma molecular adsorption system in acute-on-chronic liver failures: A propensity-score matched study.序贯式与单次双重血浆分子吸附系统治疗慢加急性肝衰竭的倾向评分匹配研究
Int J Artif Organs. 2022 Jan;45(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/0391398820987565. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Efficacy and Economic Evaluation of Nonbiological Artificial Liver Therapy in Acute-on-chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure.非生物型人工肝治疗慢性乙型肝炎急性肝衰竭的疗效及经济学评价
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023 Apr 28;11(2):433-440. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2022.00106. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
Therapeutic plasma exchange versus double plasma molecular absorption system in hepatitis B virus-infected acute-on-chronic liver failure treated by entercavir: A prospective study.恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎病毒感染的慢加急性肝衰竭时治疗性血浆置换与双重血浆分子吸附系统的前瞻性研究
J Clin Apher. 2017 Dec;32(6):453-461. doi: 10.1002/jca.21535. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Plasma Adsorption Plus Plasma Exchange Therapy for Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Pilot Study.血浆吸附联合血浆置换治疗慢加急性肝衰竭患者时局部枸橼酸抗凝的安全性和有效性:一项初步研究。
Blood Purif. 2019;48(3):223-232. doi: 10.1159/000500408. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
[Analysis of curative effect and short-term survival rate of plasma exchange and double plasma molecular adsorption combined with half-volume plasma exchange in the treatment of liver failure].血浆置换与双重血浆分子吸附联合半量血浆置换治疗肝衰竭的疗效及短期生存率分析
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 20;31(7):736-741. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230228-00083.
10
Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Small-Volume-Plasma Artificial Liver Model in the Treatment of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.小容量血浆置换人工肝模型治疗慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效及安全性分析。
Physiol Res. 2023 Dec 31;72(6):767-782. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935158.

引用本文的文献

1
Acetaminophen Poisoning: Case Reports of Early Liver Dialysis for Hepatic Injury.对乙酰氨基酚中毒:肝损伤早期肝脏透析的病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Jul 17;13(7):e70642. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70642. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Two Artificial Liver Therapies in Early-Stage Hepatitis B Virus-Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.两种人工肝疗法在乙型肝炎病毒相关性慢加急性肝衰竭早期的成本效益比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jul 12;21:1095-1105. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S521406. eCollection 2025.
3
Association between volume of processed plasma and total bilirubin reduction during plasma adsorption for severe liver disease.重症肝病血浆吸附过程中处理血浆量与总胆红素降低之间的关联
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Mar 15;30(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02419-4.
4
Preliminary experience of combined dual plasma molecular adsorption system and plasma exchange in pediatric acute liver failure: a retrospective case series.双重血浆分子吸附系统联合血浆置换治疗小儿急性肝衰竭的初步经验:一项回顾性病例系列研究
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05520-z.
5
Integrative anticoagulation of nafamostat mesylate in double plasma molecular adsorption system plus sequential half-dose plasmapheresis for patients with liver failure: a randomised controlled trial protocol.甲磺酸萘莫司他在双重血浆分子吸附系统联合序贯半量血浆置换中对肝衰竭患者进行综合抗凝治疗:一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 25;15(2):e098898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098898.
6
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict prognosis in liver failure patients treated with non-bioartificial liver support system.一种用于预测接受非生物人工肝支持系统治疗的肝衰竭患者预后的机器学习模型的开发与验证。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 13;11:1368899. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1368899. eCollection 2024.
7
A clinical study of non-bioartificial liver DPMAES support system in hepatitis B-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.乙型肝炎相关性慢加急性肝衰竭的非生物人工肝 DPMAES 支持系统的临床研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52206-0.
8
Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Small-Volume-Plasma Artificial Liver Model in the Treatment of Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.小容量血浆置换人工肝模型治疗慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效及安全性分析。
Physiol Res. 2023 Dec 31;72(6):767-782. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935158.
9
Evaluating the Effect of Artificial Liver Support on Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Using the Quantitative Difference Algorithm: Retrospective Study.使用定量差异算法评估人工肝支持对慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效:回顾性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 24;7:e45395. doi: 10.2196/45395.
10
Observation on the Effect of Sequentially Combined Multi-modal Artificial Liver Treatment on HBV-related Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.序贯联合多模态人工肝治疗对 HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效观察。
Curr Mol Med. 2024;24(9):1152-1158. doi: 10.2174/0115665240253035230920041207.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Plasma Adsorption Plus Plasma Exchange Therapy for Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Pilot Study.血浆吸附联合血浆置换治疗慢加急性肝衰竭患者时局部枸橼酸抗凝的安全性和有效性:一项初步研究。
Blood Purif. 2019;48(3):223-232. doi: 10.1159/000500408. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
Therapeutic plasma exchange and a double plasma molecular absorption system in the treatment of thyroid storm with severe liver injury: A case report.治疗性血浆置换和双重血浆分子吸附系统治疗合并严重肝损伤的甲状腺危象:1例病例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2019 May 26;7(10):1184-1190. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i10.1184.
3
Therapeutic effect of double plasma molecular adsorption system and sequential half-dose plasma exchange in patients with HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.双重血浆分子吸附系统与序贯半量血浆置换治疗乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者的疗效
J Clin Apher. 2019 Aug;34(4):392-398. doi: 10.1002/jca.21690. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
[Clinical study of different adsorbents with dual plasma molecular adsorption system in the treatment of hepatic failure].不同吸附剂双重血浆分子吸附系统治疗肝衰竭的临床研究
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 20;27(1):51-55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.01.011.
5
[Plasma exchange combined with double plasma absorption therapy improve the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure].血浆置换联合双重血浆吸附疗法改善慢性重型肝炎的预后
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 20;26(10):744-749. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.10.003.
6
Artificial liver support systems: what is new over the last decade?人工肝支持系统:过去十年有哪些新进展?
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 15;8(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0453-z.
7
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in China: Rationale for Developing a Patient Registry and Baseline Characteristics.中国慢加急性肝衰竭:建立患者登记系统的理由和基线特征。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep 1;187(9):1829-1839. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy083.
8
Therapeutic plasma exchange: A prospective randomized trial to evaluate 2 strategies in patients with liver failure.治疗性血浆置换:一项评估肝功能衰竭患者两种治疗策略的前瞻性随机试验。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2018 Apr;57(2):253-258. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
9
Guideline of Prevention and Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B (2015 Update).《慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2015年版)》
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017 Dec 28;5(4):297-318. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2016.00019. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
10
A clinical-scale BioArtificial Liver, developed for GMP, improved clinical parameters of liver function in porcine liver failure.为满足 GMP 要求而开发的临床级生物人工肝脏,改善了猪肝功能衰竭患者的临床肝功能参数。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 6;7(1):14518. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15021-4.

血浆置换、双重血浆分子吸附系统及其联合治疗慢加急性肝衰竭的比较。

Comparison of plasma exchange, double plasma molecular adsorption system, and their combination in treating acute-on-chronic liver failure.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department of People's Hospital of Baoshan City, Baoshan City, Baoshan, China.

Gastroenterology Department of Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520932053. doi: 10.1177/0300060520932053.

DOI:10.1177/0300060520932053
PMID:32552092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7303772/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of nonbiological artificial liver (NBAL) support, particularly short-term (28-day) survival rates, in patients who underwent treatment using double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS), plasma exchange (PE), or combined PE+DPMAS, in addition to comprehensive physical treatment for different stages of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 135 patients with ACLF who received NBAL treatment between November 2015 and February 2019. The patients were categorized into PE, DPMAS, and PE+DPMAS groups. Short-term effectiveness of treatment was assessed and compared based on selected clinical findings, laboratory parameters, and liver function markers.

RESULTS

Coagulation function improved significantly in all groups after treatment. In the PE and PE+DPMAS groups, prothrombin time decreased to different degrees, whereas plasma thromboplastin antecedent increased significantly after treatment. White blood cell counts increased and platelet counts decreased in all groups after treatment. The model for end-stage liver disease score, Child-Pugh grade, systematic inflammatory syndrome score, and sepsis-related organ failure score decreased in all three groups after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PE, DPMAS, and PE+DPMAS improved disease indicators in all patients with ACLF. The combined treatment improved the short-term effectiveness of treatment, especially in patients with mild ACLF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较双重血浆分子吸附系统(DPMAS)、血浆置换(PE)和联合 PE+DPMAS 三种非生物型人工肝(NBAL)治疗方案在不同分期慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者中的疗效,尤其是 28 天短期生存率。

方法

回顾性分析 2015 年 11 月至 2019 年 2 月期间 135 例接受 NBAL 治疗的 ACLF 患者的临床资料。将患者分为 PE 组、DPMAS 组和 PE+DPMAS 组。根据患者的临床指标、实验室参数和肝功能标志物,评估并比较各组患者的短期治疗效果。

结果

三组患者治疗后凝血功能均明显改善,PE 组和 PE+DPMAS 组凝血酶原时间均有不同程度下降,DPMAS 组和 PE+DPMAS 组血浆凝血酶原时间前体明显升高;三组患者白细胞计数均升高,血小板计数均降低。三组患者的终末期肝病模型评分、Child-Pugh 分级、全身炎症反应综合征评分和脓毒症相关器官衰竭评分均较治疗前降低。

结论

PE、DPMAS 和 PE+DPMAS 均可改善 ACLF 患者的病情指标。联合治疗可提高治疗的短期疗效,尤其对轻度 ACLF 患者更为有效。