Mazzotta G, Scopinaro G, de Caro E, Claudiani F, Ferroni A, Griffo R, Domenicucci S, Cavazzana G, Vecchio C
Eur Heart J. 1986 Jul;7(7):584-93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062109.
To assess the usefulness of a step by step evaluation of exercise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 219 consecutive patients with recent uncomplicated myocardial infarction and 30 normal subjects underwent a symptom-limited cycloergometer test followed by exercise radionuclide ventriculography (ExRNV). LVEF was monitored throughout the whole test. 49 patients underwent coronary arteriography for clinical reasons. 5 patterns of exercise LVEF could be observed: progressive increase: 55 patients (25%) and 27 normal subjects (90%); progressive decrease: 37 patients (17%); initial increase followed by significant decrease: 54 patients (25%); lack of initial modification and terminal decrease: 35 patients (16%); no modification: 38 patients (17%) and 3 normal subjects (10%). Grouping the patients in this fashion allowed us to increase the specificity of ExRNV from 70% to 100%, without loss of sensitivity (95%). As for the patients in subgroup C, 32/54 showed unequivocal ECG ischaemic changes, occurring simultaneously with LVEF decrease; in 33/54 LVEF dropped during the last workload; in 25/54 the last stage LVEF was equal to or higher than the basal LVEF. The statistical analysis showed that ischaemic ECG changes (P less than 0.0001), exercise-induced wall-motion abnormalities (P less than 0.0001), and the presence of multivessel coronary artery disease (P less than 0.0001) were significantly more frequent in patients showing patterns (b)-(d), which should be considered as ischaemic. Our method allowed the unequivocal identification of ischaemic patterns in LVEF during exercise, which might be missed if only its basal and final values are considered.
为评估逐步评估运动左心室射血分数(LVEF)的实用性,219例近期无并发症心肌梗死的连续患者和30例正常受试者接受了症状限制的踏车测力计测试,随后进行运动放射性核素心室造影(ExRNV)。在整个测试过程中监测LVEF。49例患者因临床原因接受了冠状动脉造影。可观察到5种运动LVEF模式:进行性增加:55例患者(25%)和27例正常受试者(90%);进行性降低:37例患者(17%);先增加后显著降低:54例患者(25%);初始无变化而末期降低:35例患者(16%);无变化:38例患者(17%)和3例正常受试者(10%)。以这种方式对患者进行分组使我们能够将ExRNV的特异性从70%提高到100%,而不损失敏感性(95%)。至于C亚组的患者,54例中有32例显示明确的心电图缺血性改变,与LVEF降低同时出现;54例中有33例在最后负荷时LVEF下降;54例中有25例最后阶段的LVEF等于或高于基础LVEF。统计分析表明,在显示(b)-(d)模式的患者中,缺血性心电图改变(P<0.0001)、运动诱发的室壁运动异常(P<0.0001)和多支冠状动脉疾病的存在(P<0.0001)明显更常见,这些模式应被视为缺血性。我们的方法能够明确识别运动期间LVEF的缺血模式,而仅考虑其基础值和最终值时可能会遗漏这些模式。