Suppr超能文献

表面显微镜线圈与踝关节专用相控阵线圈磁共振成像在评估距骨术前骨软骨损伤中的比较。

Comparison of surface microscopy coil and ankle joint special phased array coil magnetic resonance imaging in assessing preoperative osteochondral lesions of the talus.

作者信息

Chen Yanbo, Li Yong, Liu Wenzhou, Wang Zhihui, Li Jiajie, Chen Chen, Zeng Gang, Shen Jun, Song Weidong

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):4973-4983. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1202. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lesion size is a major determinant of treatment strategies and predictor of clinical outcomes for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been commonly used in the preoperative evaluation of OLTs, MRI has low reliability and usually overestimates or underestimates lesion size compared with intraoperative assessment. This study aims to determine whether the surface microscopy coil (SMC) can improve the accuracy of assessment of preoperative OLTs compared with conventional coil MRI, ankle joint special phased array coil (ASC).

METHODS

A total of 43 patients diagnosed with OLTs undertook preoperative MRI examination with both SMC and ASC were included in this prospective study from 2019 to 2022. The diameter of the lesion was measured in sagittal plane and coronal plane at its widest point and then the lesion area was calculated. Then MRI measurements were compared with arthroscopy or open-surgery measurements.

RESULTS

The mean lesion area measured with ASC was significantly greater than that measured intraoperatively (95.07±44.60 . 52.74±29.86 mm, P<0.001), while there was no significant difference between lesion area measured in SMC and intraoperatively (55.28±36.06 . 52.74±29.86 mm, P=0.576). Diameter measured in ASC was significantly greater than that measured intraoperatively in both coronal plane (8.95±2.48 . 6.67±1.81, P<0.001) and sagittal plane (13.12±3.76 . 9.58±3.98, P<0.001). No significant difference between lesion diameter measured in SMC and intraoperatively in both coronal plane (6.44±2.59 . 6.67±1.81, P=0.608) or sagittal plane (10.23±3.69 . 9.58±3.98, P=0.194). Compared with surgical assessment, 39 of 43 cases were consistent with SMC assessment while only 26 of 43 cases were consistent with ASC assessment (39/43 . 26/43, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Diameter measured with SMC was much more accurate than ASC MRI. Compared with ASC MRI, the SMC had a much higher concordance rate between preoperative assessment and surgical assessment.

摘要

背景

病损大小是距骨骨软骨损伤(OLTs)治疗策略的主要决定因素及临床预后的预测指标。尽管磁共振成像(MRI)已普遍用于OLTs的术前评估,但与术中评估相比,MRI可靠性较低,通常会高估或低估病损大小。本研究旨在确定表面显微镜线圈(SMC)与传统线圈MRI、踝关节特殊相控阵线圈(ASC)相比,是否能提高术前OLTs评估的准确性。

方法

2019年至2022年,共有43例诊断为OLTs的患者纳入本前瞻性研究,均接受了SMC和ASC的术前MRI检查。在矢状面和冠状面的最宽点测量病损直径,然后计算病损面积。随后将MRI测量结果与关节镜检查或开放手术测量结果进行比较。

结果

ASC测量的平均病损面积显著大于术中测量值(95.07±44.60. 52.74±29.86平方毫米,P<0.001),而SMC测量的病损面积与术中测量值无显著差异(55.28±36.06. 52.74±29.86平方毫米,P=0.576)。ASC测量的直径在冠状面(8.95±2.48. 6.67±1.81,P<0.001)和矢状面(13.12±3.76. 9.58±3.98,P<0.001)均显著大于术中测量值。SMC测量的病损直径在冠状面(6.44±2.59. 6.67±1.81,P=0.608)或矢状面(10.23±3.69. 9.58±3.98,P=0.194)与术中测量值均无显著差异。与手术评估相比,43例中有39例与SMC评估一致,而43例中只有26例与ASC评估一致(39/43. 26/43,P=0.002)。

结论

SMC测量的直径比ASC MRI准确得多。与ASC MRI相比,SMC在术前评估与手术评估之间的一致性率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/630f/10423370/21df0576bf05/qims-13-08-4973-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验