• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在服务中试用优化的社交小组干预措施,以增强弱势青年的社交联系和心理健康(一起):一项可行性随机对照试验的研究方案。

Trialling an optimised social groups intervention in services to enhance social connectedness and mental health in vulnerable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.

Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0288676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288676. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288676
PMID:37582069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calls have been made to rethink the mental health support currently available for young people. This study aims to help re-focus and reduce the inaccessibility of mental health services by offering an adapted version of a theoretically-driven, evidence-based, guided psychosocial intervention known as 'Groups 4 Health' (G4H). To date, the G4H intervention has mainly been trialled in Australia, with promising positive effects on social connection, mental health and well-being. The present study examines the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial when delivering the G4H intervention for young people in the UK.

METHODS

The TOGETHER study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an adapted version of the G4H intervention. Participants are aged 16-25, currently experiencing mental health difficulties and recruited from mental health services. The target sample size is 30, with 15 in each trial arm. Participants are randomly allocated to either G4H plus treatment as usual, or treatment as usual alone. The primary outcomes of interest are the feasibility of recruitment, randomisation, data collection and retention to the study at 10 and 14 week follow up, as well as the acceptability, and accessibility of the study protocol and G4H intervention.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will indicate if further optimisation is required to improve the feasibility, acceptability and accessibility of the intervention and study protocol procedures as perceived by end users and practitioners. This offers a significant opportunity to support the local and national demand for accessible, innovative, and effective psychosocial youth mental health support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12505807). Registration date: 11/04/2022.

摘要

背景

人们呼吁重新思考当前为年轻人提供的心理健康支持。本研究旨在通过提供一种经过改编的、基于理论且有证据支持的、名为“团体 4 健康”(G4H)的心理社会干预措施,帮助重新关注并减少心理健康服务的不可及性。迄今为止,G4H 干预措施主要在澳大利亚进行了试验,对社交联系、心理健康和幸福感产生了积极的影响。本研究探讨了在英国为年轻人提供 G4H 干预措施时进行随机对照试验的可行性。

方法

TOGETHER 研究是一项关于 G4H 干预措施改编版本的可行性随机对照试验。参与者年龄在 16-25 岁之间,目前正在经历心理健康困难,并从心理健康服务机构招募。目标样本量为 30 人,每组 15 人。参与者被随机分配到 G4H 加常规治疗或仅常规治疗。主要观察指标为招募、随机分组、数据收集和保留到 10 周和 14 周随访的可行性,以及研究方案和 G4H 干预措施的可接受性和可及性。

讨论

这项研究的结果将表明是否需要进一步优化,以提高干预措施和研究方案程序的可行性、可接受性和可及性,这为满足当地和国家对可及、创新和有效的青年心理健康支持的需求提供了一个重要机会。

试验注册

ISRCTN 注册处(ISRCTN80421237)。注册日期:2022 年 4 月 11 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/10426917/54760d8a9126/pone.0288676.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/10426917/54760d8a9126/pone.0288676.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e22/10426917/54760d8a9126/pone.0288676.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Trialling an optimised social groups intervention in services to enhance social connectedness and mental health in vulnerable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.在服务中试用优化的社交小组干预措施,以增强弱势青年的社交联系和心理健康(一起):一项可行性随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0288676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288676. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychological Support for Personality (PSP) versus treatment as usual: study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a low intensity intervention for people with personality disorder.人格心理支持(PSP)与常规治疗对比:一项针对人格障碍患者的低强度干预可行性随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 10;19(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2920-0.
3
A modified video-feedback intervention for carers of foster children aged 6 years and under with reactive attachment disorder: a feasibility study and pilot RCT.改良视频反馈干预对 6 岁及以下寄养儿童反应性依恋障碍照顾者的效果:一项可行性研究和初步随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(35):1-106. doi: 10.3310/SLIZ1119.
4
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
5
The Community Navigator Study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase community connections and reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项可行性随机对照试验,旨在开展一项干预措施,以增强患有复杂焦虑症或抑郁症的人群的社区联系并减少其孤独感。
Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7.
6
Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT.严重精神疾病患者的性健康促进:尊重可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(65):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta23650.
7
Individualised placement and support programme for people unemployed because of chronic pain: a feasibility study and the InSTEP pilot RCT.因慢性疼痛而失业的人群的个体化安置和支持计划:一项可行性研究和 InSTEP 试点 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(5):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta25050.
8
Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After covid-19 InfectioN' (REGAIN): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 感染后康复锻炼和心理支持(REGAIN):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04978-9.
9
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
10
The RESPECT study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a sexual health promotion intervention for people with serious mental illness in community mental health services in the UK.RESPECT 研究:在英国社区精神卫生服务中,对严重精神疾病患者进行性健康促进干预的可行性随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):1736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09661-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Will the pandemic reframe loneliness and social isolation?这场大流行会重新定义孤独和社交隔离吗?
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Feb;2(2):e54-e55. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(20)30066-0. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of social recovery therapy for the prevention and treatment of long-term social disability among young people with emerging severe mental illness (PRODIGY): randomised controlled trial.社会康复疗法预防和治疗青少年新发严重精神疾病长期社会残疾的临床和成本效益研究(PRODIGY):随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;220(3):154-162. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.206.
3
Groups 4 Health protects against unanticipated threats to mental health: Evaluating two interventions during COVID-19 lockdown among young people with a history of depression and loneliness.
群组 4 健康预防精神健康的意外威胁:在 COVID-19 封锁期间评估针对有抑郁和孤独史的年轻人的两项干预措施。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:316-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.封锁期间谁感到孤独?新冠疫情前和期间孤独的预测因素的跨队列分析。
Public Health. 2020 Sep;186:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
5
Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness.新冠疫情中的社交隔离:孤独感的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):525-527. doi: 10.1177/0020764020922269. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial.群组 4 健康方案可降低心理困扰成年人的孤独感和社交焦虑:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):787-801. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000427.
7
The evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: time for change?基于证据的群体层面症状减轻模型作为精神卫生保健的组织原则:变革的时候到了吗?
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):88-96. doi: 10.1002/wps.20609.
8
Connectedness to family, school, peers, and community in socially vulnerable adolescents.社会弱势群体中青少年与家庭、学校、同龄人及社区的联系。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017 Oct;81:321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.011.
9
Social networks of patients with chronic depression: A systematic review.慢性抑郁症患者的社交网络:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:571-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
10
Predicting early transition from sub-syndromal presentations to major mental disorders.预测从亚综合征表现向重度精神障碍的早期转变。
BJPsych Open. 2017 Sep 13;3(5):223-227. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.117.004721. eCollection 2017 Sep.