Thiboutot Jeffrey, Pastis Nicholas J, Akulian Jason, Silvestri Gerard A, Chen Alexander, Wahidi Momen M, Gilbert Christopher R, Lin Cheng Ting, Los Jenna, Flenaugh Eric, Semaan Roy, Burks A Cole, Sathyanarayan Priya, Wu Sam, Feller-Kopman David, Cheng George Z, Alalawi Raed, Rahman Najib M, Maldonado Fabien, Lee Hans J, Yarmus Lonny
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct 15;208(8):837-845. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0099OC.
Strict adherence to procedural protocols and diagnostic definitions is critical to understand the efficacy of new technologies. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) for lung nodule biopsy has been used for decades without a solid understanding of its efficacy, but offers the opportunity for simultaneous tissue acquisition via electromagnetic navigational transthoracic biopsy (EMN-TTNA) and staging via endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). To evaluate the diagnostic yield of EBUS, ENB, and EMN-TTNA during a single procedure using a strict definition of diagnostic yield with central pathology adjudication. A prospective, single-arm trial was conducted at eight centers enrolling participants with pulmonary nodules (<3 cm; without computed tomography [CT]- and/or positron emission tomography-positive mediastinal lymph nodes) who underwent a staged procedure with same-day CT, EBUS, ENB, and EMN-TTNA. The procedure was staged such that, when a diagnosis had been achieved via rapid on-site pathologic evaluation, the procedure was ended and subsequent biopsy modalities were not attempted. A study finding was diagnostic if an independent pathology core laboratory confirmed malignancy or a definitive benign finding. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of the combination of CT, EBUS, ENB, and EMN-TTNA. A total of 160 participants at 8 centers with a mean nodule size of 18 ± 6 mm were enrolled. The diagnostic yield of the combined procedure was 59% (94 of 160; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51-66%). Nodule regression was found on same-day CT in 2.5% of cases (4 of 160; 95% CI, 0.69-6.3%), and EBUS confirmed malignancy in 7.1% of cases (11 of 156; 95% CI, 3.6-12%). The yield of ENB alone was 49% (74 of 150; 95% CI, 41-58%), that of EMN-TTNA alone was 27% (8 of 30; 95% CI, 12-46%), and that of ENB plus EMN-TTNA was 53% (79 of 150; 95% CI, 44-61%). Complications included a pneumothorax rate of 10% and a 2% bleeding rate. When EMN-TTNA was performed, the pneumothorax rate was 30%. The diagnostic yield for ENB is 49%, which increases to 59% with the addition of same-day CT, EBUS, and EMN-TTNA, lower than in prior reports in the literature. The high complication rate and low diagnostic yield of EMN-TTNA does not support its routine use. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03338049).
严格遵守程序协议和诊断定义对于了解新技术的疗效至关重要。用于肺结节活检的电磁导航支气管镜检查(ENB)已使用数十年,但对其疗效尚无深入了解,不过它提供了通过电磁导航经胸活检(EMN-TTNA)同时获取组织以及通过支气管内超声(EBUS)进行分期的机会。为了使用严格的诊断产率定义并经中心病理学判定来评估单次手术中EBUS、ENB和EMN-TTNA的诊断产率。在八个中心进行了一项前瞻性单臂试验,纳入患有肺结节(<3厘米;无计算机断层扫描[CT]和/或正电子发射断层扫描阳性的纵隔淋巴结)的参与者,他们接受了同一天进行CT、EBUS、ENB和EMN-TTNA的分期手术。手术进行了分期,以便在通过快速现场病理评估得出诊断后,手术结束,不再尝试后续活检方式。如果独立的病理核心实验室确认恶性或明确的良性结果,则研究结果具有诊断意义。主要终点是CT、EBUS、ENB和EMN-TTNA联合使用的诊断产率。8个中心共有160名参与者入组,平均结节大小为18±6毫米。联合手术的诊断产率为59%(160例中的94例;95%置信区间[CI],51-66%)。2.5%的病例(160例中的4例;95%CI,0.69-6.3%)在同一天的CT上发现结节缩小,7.1%的病例(156例中的11例;95%CI,3.6-12%)EBUS确认恶性肿瘤。单独ENB的产率为49%(150例中的74例;95%CI,41-58%),单独EMN-TTNA的产率为27%(30例中的8例;95%CI,12-46%),ENB加EMN-TTNA的产率为53%(150例中的79例;95%CI,44-61%)。并发症包括气胸发生率为10%和出血率为2%。当进行EMN-TTNA时,气胸发生率为30%。ENB的诊断产率为49%,加上同一天的CT、EBUS和EMN-TTNA后增至59%,低于文献中先前的报告。EMN-TTNA的高并发症率和低诊断产率不支持其常规使用。在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册的临床试验(NCT03338049)。