Department of Sociology, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
LGBT Health. 2024 Jan;11(1):57-65. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0350. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Transgender and nonbinary individuals often have limited educational and economic resources, lack social capital such as family and community support, and face discrimination. These factors are likely to have negative consequences for subjective well-being of transgender individuals. Yet, there is limited research using a national sample and comparing trans women, trans men, and nonbinary individuals. This study examined the impact of social support, social belonging, transgender connectedness, and discrimination on trans and nonbinary individuals' life satisfaction and negative affect. We used data from TransPop 2016-2018, the first survey conducted on a national probability sample of the transgender population in the United States. We focused on measures of life satisfaction and negative affect and their predictors, including social belonging, transgender connectedness, and everyday discrimination. We found that trans men, trans women, and nonbinary individuals had lower life satisfaction and higher negative affect than cisgender heterosexual individuals. Social belonging had a positive effect on trans men and trans women's life satisfaction, whereas it had a negative effect on trans men and nonbinary individuals' negative emotion. While family support had a positive effect on trans men's life satisfaction, social support had mixed effects on nonbinary individuals' life satisfaction and negative affect. Finally, everyday discrimination had a negative influence on life satisfaction although there was variation by gender identity and dependent measure. Different factors predicted life satisfaction and negative affect of trans men, trans women, and nonbinary people. Thus, a one-size-fits-all model of trans and nonbinary subjective well-being does not work.
跨性别者和非二元性别者通常拥有有限的教育和经济资源,缺乏家庭和社区支持等社会资本,而且面临歧视。这些因素可能对跨性别者的主观幸福感产生负面影响。然而,使用全国性样本并比较跨性别女性、跨性别男性和非二元性别者的研究有限。本研究考察了社会支持、社会归属感、跨性别联系感和歧视对跨性别者和非二元性别者的生活满意度和负面情绪的影响。我们使用了来自 TransPop 2016-2018 年的数据,这是首次对美国跨性别群体进行的全国概率抽样调查。我们关注的是生活满意度和负面情绪及其预测因素,包括社会归属感、跨性别联系感和日常歧视。我们发现,跨性别男性、跨性别女性和非二元性别者的生活满意度低于顺性别异性恋者,负面情绪高于顺性别异性恋者。社会归属感对跨性别男性和跨性别女性的生活满意度有积极影响,而对跨性别男性和非二元性别者的负面情绪有消极影响。虽然家庭支持对跨性别男性的生活满意度有积极影响,但社会支持对非二元性别者的生活满意度和负面情绪有混合影响。最后,日常歧视对生活满意度有负面影响,尽管在性别认同和依赖测量上存在差异。不同的因素预测了跨性别男性、跨性别女性和非二元性别人群的生活满意度和负面情绪。因此,一刀切的跨性别和非二元主观幸福感模式并不适用。