Parente Andrea, Medetti Marta, Raineri Davide, Parente Franco, Ventura Alberto, Legnani Claudio
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgery Center, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Orthop. 2023 Jul 25;43:121-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.027. eCollection 2023 Sep.
The aim of this study was to assess the functional, radiological, and clinical outcomes of patellofemoral joint in patients who had total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing for end-stage osteoarthritis using inverse restricted kinematic alignment (irKA) compared to a control group using adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), both executed with the same implant at the same Institution. The hypothesis was that patients undergoing TKA without patellar resurfacing for end-stage osteoarthritis using irKA would have superior outcomes related to the patellofemoral joint in comparison to a control group using aMA.
A retrospective examination of registries' prospectively obtained from patients who underwent primary TKA at our Institution between 2016 and 2020 was performed. 40 consecutive patients who underwent TKA implant using irKA were compared to a control group of 80 who had undergone adjusted mechanically-aligned TKA. Groups were matched for age and body mass index. Clinical assessment included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Kujala Knee Score. Standard weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral view x-rays were used for radiographic evaluation. Patellar height was assessed using Caton-Deschamps (C-D) and Insall index on lateral view films.
In comparison to pre-operative status, both groups had postoperative improvements in VAS, KOOS, KSS, and Kujala ratings (p0.001). Regarding Kujala score, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.68). Insall index and C-D index results were not statistically different across groups (p = 0.02 and 0.74 respectively).
Improvements in post-operative clinical and functional outcomes following TKA were associated with either irKA or aMA. There were no discernible changes between the two groups in terms of postoperative patellofemoral discomfort or variations in patellar height.
本研究旨在评估在同一机构使用相同植入物的情况下,采用反向受限运动学对线(irKA)对终末期骨关节炎行全膝关节置换术(TKA)且未进行髌骨表面置换的患者,与采用调整机械对线(aMA)的对照组相比,髌股关节的功能、影像学和临床结局。假设是,与使用aMA的对照组相比,采用irKA对终末期骨关节炎行TKA且未进行髌骨表面置换的患者在髌股关节方面会有更好的结局。
对2016年至2020年在本机构接受初次TKA患者的登记资料进行回顾性检查。将连续40例行irKA的TKA植入患者与80例接受调整机械对线TKA的对照组进行比较。两组在年龄和体重指数方面进行匹配。临床评估包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、膝关节骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)、膝关节协会评分(KSS)和库贾拉膝关节评分。使用标准负重前后位和侧位X线片进行影像学评估。在侧位片上使用卡顿 - 德尚(C - D)和英萨尔指数评估髌骨高度。
与术前状态相比,两组在VAS、KOOS、KSS和库贾拉评分方面术后均有改善(p<0.001)。关于库贾拉评分,两组之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.68)。两组间英萨尔指数和C - D指数结果无统计学差异(分别为p = 0.02和0.74)。
TKA术后临床和功能结局的改善与irKA或aMA均相关。两组在术后髌股关节不适或髌骨高度变化方面没有明显差异。