Emami Zeydi Amir, Ghazanfari Mohammad Javad, Ashrafi Sadra, Maroufizadeh Saman, Mashhadban Majid, Khaleghdoost Mohammadi Tahereh, Darvishnia David, Foolady Azarnaminy Afsaneh, Assadi Touraj, Mohsenizadeh Seyed Mostafa, Karkhah Samad
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Nasibeh School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2022 Apr;21(4):487-495.
Appropriate respiratory support is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study aimed to investigate the different modalities of respiratory support and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs).
In a retrospective study, we enrolled 290 critically ill COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the ICUs of four hospitals in Mazandaran, northern Iran. Data were extracted from the medical records of all included patients, from December 2019 to July 2021. Patients' demographic data, symptoms, laboratory findings, comorbidities, treatment, and clinical outcomes were collected.
46.55% of patients died. Patients with ≥2 comorbidities had significantly increased odds of death (OR=5.88, 95%CI: 1.97-17.52, P=0.001) as compared with patients with no comorbidities. Respiratory support methods such as face mask (survived=37, deceased=18, P=0.022), a non-rebreather mask (survived=39, deceased=12, P<0.001), and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) (survived=103, deceased=110, P=0.004) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Duration of respiratory support in nasal cannula (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.001), face mask (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.001), a non-rebreather mask (survived=3, deceased=2, P=0.033), mechanical ventilation (survived=5, deceased=6, P<0.019), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.017), and SIMV (survived=4, deceased=5, P=0.001) methods were associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
Special attention should be paid to COVID-19 patients with more than two comorbidities. As a specific point of interest, SIMV may increase the in-hospital mortality rate of critically ill patients with COVID-19 connected to mechanical ventilation and be associated with adverse outcomes.
适当的呼吸支持对于改善感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的重症患者的临床结局至关重要。本研究旨在调查重症监护病房(ICU)中新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的不同呼吸支持方式及临床结局。
在一项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了伊朗北部马赞德兰省四家医院ICU收治的290例重症COVID-19患者。数据从2019年12月至2021年7月期间所有纳入患者的病历中提取。收集患者的人口统计学数据、症状、实验室检查结果、合并症、治疗情况及临床结局。
46.55%的患者死亡。与无合并症的患者相比,合并症≥2种的患者死亡几率显著增加(比值比[OR]=5.88,95%置信区间[CI]:1.97 - 17.52,P = 0.001)。面罩(存活=37例,死亡=18例,P = 0.022)、非重复呼吸面罩(存活=39例,死亡=12例,P<0.001)和同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)(存活=103例,死亡=110例,P = 0.004)等呼吸支持方式与院内死亡率相关。鼻导管吸氧(存活=3例,死亡=2例,P<0.001)、面罩(存活=3例,死亡=2例,P<0.001)、非重复呼吸面罩(存活=3例,死亡=2例,P = 0.033)、机械通气(存活=5例,死亡=6例,P<0.019)、持续气道正压通气(CPAP)(存活=3例,死亡=2例,P<0.017)和SIMV(存活=4例,死亡=5例,P = 0.001)等呼吸支持方式的持续时间与较高的院内死亡率相关。
应特别关注合并症超过两种的COVID-19患者。特别值得注意的是,SIMV可能会增加接受机械通气的重症COVID-19患者的院内死亡率,并与不良结局相关。