Savito Luisa, Scarlata Simone, Bikov Andras, Carratù Pierluigi, Carpagnano Giovanna Elisiana, Dragonieri Silvano
Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Thoracic Endoscopy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Rome 00128, Italy.
Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom.
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jul 26;11(21):4996-5013. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i21.4996.
The asthmatic inflammatory process results in the generation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are subsequently secreted by the airways. The study of these elements through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which can identify individual molecules with a discriminatory capacity of over 85%, and electronic-Nose (e-NOSE), which is able to perform a quick onboard pattern-recognition analysis of VOCs, has allowed new prospects for non-invasive analysis of the disease in an "omics" approach. In this review, we aim to collect and compare the progress made in VOCs analysis using the two methods and their instrumental characteristics. Studies have described the potential of GC-MS and e-NOSE in a multitude of relevant aspects of the disease in both children and adults, as well as differential diagnosis between asthma and other conditions such as wheezing, cystic fibrosis, COPD, allergic rhinitis and last but not least, the accuracy of these methods compared to other diagnostic tools such as lung function, FeNO and eosinophil count. Due to significant limitations of both methods, it is still necessary to improve and standardize techniques. Currently, e-NOSE appears to be the most promising aid in clinical practice, whereas GC-MS, as the gold standard for the structural analysis of molecules, remains an essential tool in terms of research for further studies on the pathophysiologic pathways of the asthmatic inflammatory process. In conclusion, the study of VOCs through GC-MS and e-NOSE appears to hold promise for the non-invasive diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of asthma, as well as for further research studies on the disease.
哮喘炎症过程会产生挥发性有机化合物(VOCs),这些化合物随后会由气道分泌出来。通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)(其能够识别单个分子,鉴别能力超过85%)和电子鼻(e-NOSE)(其能够对VOCs进行快速的机载模式识别分析)对这些成分进行研究,为以“组学”方法对该疾病进行非侵入性分析带来了新的前景。在本综述中,我们旨在收集并比较使用这两种方法进行VOCs分析所取得的进展及其仪器特性。研究已经描述了GC-MS和e-NOSE在儿童和成人该疾病的诸多相关方面的潜力,以及哮喘与其他病症(如喘息、囊性纤维化、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、过敏性鼻炎)之间的鉴别诊断,最后但同样重要的是,与其他诊断工具(如肺功能、呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)和嗜酸性粒细胞计数)相比,这些方法的准确性。由于这两种方法都存在显著局限性,因此仍有必要改进和规范技术。目前,e-NOSE似乎是临床实践中最有前景的辅助手段,而GC-MS作为分子结构分析的金标准,在哮喘炎症过程病理生理途径的进一步研究方面仍然是一项必不可少的研究工具。总之,通过GC-MS和e-NOSE对VOCs进行研究,对于哮喘的非侵入性诊断、评估和监测以及对该疾病的进一步研究似乎都具有前景。