Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.
Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Transplantation. 2024 Feb 1;108(2):498-505. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004751. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
The allocation system for livers began using acuity circles (AC) in 2020. In this study, we sought to evaluate the impact of AC policy on the utilization rate for liver transplantation (LT).
Using the US national registry data between 2018 and 2022, LTs were equally divided into 2 eras: pre-AC (before February 4, 2020) and post-AC (February 4, 2020, and after). Deceased potential liver donors were defined as deceased donors from whom at least 1 organ was procured.
The annual number of deceased potential liver donors increased post-AC (from 10 423 to 12 259), approaching equal to that of new waitlist registrations for LT (n = 12 801). Although the discard risk index of liver grafts was comparable between the pre- and post-AC eras, liver utilization rates in donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors were lower post-AC ( P < 0.01; 79.8% versus 83.4% and 23.7% versus 26.0%, respectively). Recipient factors, ie, no recipient located, recipient determined unsuitable, or time constraints, were more likely to be reasons for nonutilization after implementation of the AC allocation system compared to the pre-AC era (20.0% versus 12.3% for DBD donors and 50.1% versus 40.8% for DCD donors). Among non-high-volume centers, centers with lower utilization of marginal DBD donors or DCD donors were more likely to decrease LT volume post-AC.
Although the number of deceased potential liver donors has increased, overall liver utilization among deceased donors has decreased in the post-AC era. To maximize the donor pool for LT, future efforts should target specific reasons for liver nonutilization.
2020 年开始使用急性病症圈(AC)分配肝脏。本研究旨在评估 AC 政策对肝移植(LT)利用率的影响。
使用 2018 年至 2022 年美国国家登记数据,将 LT 分为 2 个时期:AC 前(2020 年 2 月 4 日之前)和 AC 后(2020 年 2 月 4 日及之后)。潜在的已故肝脏供体定义为至少有 1 个器官被采集的已故供体。
AC 后,潜在的已故肝脏供体数量每年增加(从 10423 例增加到 12259 例),接近 LT 新等待名单注册人数(n=12801 例)。尽管脑死亡(DBD)和循环死亡(DCD)供体肝移植物的淘汰风险指数在 AC 前、后时期相似,但 DBD 和 DCD 供体的肝利用率较低(P<0.01;分别为 79.8%对 83.4%和 23.7%对 26.0%)。与 AC 前时期相比,AC 分配系统实施后,非利用的原因更多是受体未定位、受体不适合或时间限制(DBD 供体分别为 20.0%对 12.3%和 DCD 供体为 50.1%对 40.8%)。在非高容量中心中,利用边缘性 DBD 供体或 DCD 供体较少的中心,在 AC 后更有可能减少 LT 量。
尽管潜在的已故肝脏供体数量增加,但在 AC 后时期,已故供体的总体肝利用率下降。为了最大限度地扩大 LT 的供体库,未来的努力应针对肝非利用的具体原因。