NYU Grossman School of Medicine, USA; Vanderbilt University, USA.
Vanderbilt University, USA.
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Feb;33(2):174-188. doi: 10.1177/09636625231187321. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
Viewers' responses to (2013-2017), a popular, genetics-themed sci-fi television series, reveal much about public understanding of the ethical challenges associated with genetic science. In this article, we assess how fans of process the bioethical themes that are prominent in the show through an analysis of 182 viewer-created blog posts. Using a mixed methods approach, our findings reveal that 's fans distill the essence of the show down to its characters' fight for autonomy. Furthermore, fan blogs reveal two notable pathways through which this bioethical principle is explored: gender and reproduction. Viewers draw striking connections between the moral problems they observe on screen in and those they see in the real world-both today and in a possible future-particularly as those problems affect women. While existing scholarship acknowledges these themes in the show itself, our approach demonstrates science fiction fans' active participation in meaning-making and bioethical reasoning and offers a novel approach to studying fan-generated content for public understanding of science research.
观众对《血族》(2013-2017)的回应揭示了公众对与遗传科学相关的伦理挑战的理解。在本文中,我们通过分析 182 篇观众创作的博客文章,评估了《血族》的粉丝如何通过分析剧中突出的生物伦理主题来处理这些主题。我们采用混合方法,发现《血族》的粉丝将该剧的精髓提炼为角色对自主权的争取。此外,粉丝博客揭示了探索这一生物伦理原则的两条显著途径:性别和生殖。观众将他们在屏幕上看到的《血族》中的道德问题与他们在现实世界中看到的问题,包括今天和可能的未来,联系起来——特别是当这些问题影响到女性时。虽然现有文献承认了剧中的这些主题,但我们的方法展示了科幻迷在意义构建和生物伦理推理方面的积极参与,并为研究粉丝生成的内容以了解公众对科学研究的看法提供了一种新方法。