• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧乳房切除术的年轻乳腺癌患者生存结局的比较。

Comparison of Survival Outcomes in Young Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Versus Unilateral Mastectomy.

作者信息

Huang Hongbo, Wei Tingting, Zhang Aijie, Zhang Heng, Kong Lingquan, Li Yunhai, Li Fan

机构信息

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Health Management Center, University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Oct;23(7):752-762.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.010
PMID:37586925
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has been performed for several decades in patients with unilateral breast cancer (BC). However, the survival benefits of CPM are controversial, particularly in young women.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this retrospective study, the clinical total of 69,000 young female patients (age ≤ 40 years) who were diagnosed to have unilateral BC and underwent unilateral mastectomy (UM) or CPM between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias and overcome differences in tumor characteristics between the CPM and UM groups. Overall survival (OS) and BC-specific survival (BCSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared across groups using log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

A total of 36,528 patients (21,600 and 14,928 patients in the UM and CPM groups, respectively) were included in follow study. The CPM group showed a higher 5-year OS rate (82.1% vs. 75.8%) and a higher 5-year BCSS rate (83.5% vs. 77.7%) than the UM group. Multivariate Cox analysis after PSM (n = 13,089) showed that CPM significantly decreased 25% risk of all-cause mortality (OS, HR: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.80; P < .001) and 25% risk of BC-specific mortality (BCSS, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70-0.80; P < .001) in young BC patients as compared to UM.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that CPM improved OS and BCSS benefits in young BC patients as compared to UM. Randomized clinical trials with a larger sample size are required in the future to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

对单侧乳腺癌(BC)患者进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)已有数十年历史。然而,CPM的生存获益存在争议,尤其是在年轻女性中。

材料与方法

在这项回顾性研究中,从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索了2000年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间被诊断为单侧BC并接受单侧乳房切除术(UM)或CPM的69000名年轻女性患者(年龄≤40岁)的临床数据。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少选择偏倚并克服CPM组和UM组之间肿瘤特征的差异。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估总生存期(OS)和BC特异性生存期(BCSS),并使用对数秩检验进行组间比较。进行多变量Cox比例风险回归分析以估计风险比(HR)。

结果

共有36528例患者(UM组和CPM组分别为21600例和14928例)纳入随访研究。CPM组的5年OS率(82.1%对75.8%)和5年BCSS率(83.5%对77.7%)均高于UM组。PSM后(n = 13089)的多变量Cox分析显示,与UM相比,CPM显著降低了年轻BC患者25%的全因死亡率风险(OS,HR:0.75,95%置信区间[CI]:0.70 - 0.80;P <.001)和25%的BC特异性死亡率风险(BCSS,HR:0.75,95%CI:0.70 - 0.80;P <.001)。

结论

本研究表明,与UM相比,CPM改善了年轻BC患者的OS和BCSS获益。未来需要更大样本量的随机临床试验来证实这些结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Survival Outcomes in Young Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Versus Unilateral Mastectomy.接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧乳房切除术的年轻乳腺癌患者生存结局的比较。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Oct;23(7):752-762.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Trend and survival benefit of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among men with stage I-III unilateral breast cancer in the USA, 1998-2016.美国 1998-2016 年 I-III 期单侧乳腺癌男性患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的趋势和生存获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Dec;190(3):503-515. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06397-z. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
No survival improvement of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with invasive lobular carcinoma.浸润性小叶癌女性行对侧预防性乳房切除术并不能提高生存率。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;118(6):928-935. doi: 10.1002/jso.25221. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
4
Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用日益增加,尽管对浸润性乳腺癌的长期生存并无改善。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698.
5
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer in Chinese female population: a retrospective cohort study.中国女性人群单侧乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1668-1685. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-384. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
Second primary breast cancer after unilateral mastectomy alone or with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.单侧乳房切除术或对侧预防性乳房切除术治疗后的第二原发乳腺癌。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):8043-8052. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3394. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Trends of incidence and mortality in metaplastic breast cancer and the effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A population-based study.化生性乳腺癌的发病和死亡趋势及对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.09.053. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
8
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy provides no survival benefit in young women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术对雌激素受体阴性的年轻乳腺癌女性患者并无生存获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3231-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3956-3. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Survival analysis of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a question of selection bias.对侧预防性乳房切除术的生存分析:选择偏倚问题。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(11):3448-56. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3930-0. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术的社会和临床决定因素
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):582-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5689.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.对侧预防性乳房切除术对单侧乳腺癌患者生存结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1873-1881. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9708.