Suppr超能文献

对有隐睾病史的非梗阻性无精子症患者采用逐步小切口显微解剖睾丸取精术:一项病例对照研究。

Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction in NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism: a case-control study.

作者信息

Xu Shuai, Huang Yuhua, Yao Chencheng, Li Peng, Zhi Erlei, Chen Wei, Deng Cunzhong, Zhao Fujun, Li Zheng, Tian Ruhui

机构信息

Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Department of ART, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Basic Clin Androl. 2023 Aug 17;33(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12610-023-00196-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the orchiopexy is recommended for cryptorchidism to preserve male fertility, non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may occur in adulthood. Fortunately, a great many of azoospermic men may obtain sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Due to the potential injuries caused by testicular diagnostic biopsy and vascular damage at the time of orchidopexy, minimal invasiveness is particularly important during mTESE, aims to reduce the surgical damage and avoids secondary testicular failure. This comparative study aims to investigate the efficacy of stepwise mini-incision mTESE technique by comparison with standard mTESE in the treatment of NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism.

RESULTS

A total of 73 mTESE procedures were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 37 cases performed by stepwise mini-incision mTESE, while Group 2 included 36 cases with standard mTESE. The overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in the two groups was 68.5% (50/73), with no significant difference in SRR between Group 1 (78.4%, 29/37) and Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.1). In addition, 46.0% of the patients (17/37) obtained sperm in the first mini-incision step in Group 1, which was also equal to an overall SRR in Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.3). The operation time in Group 1 (72.6 ± 33.9 min) was significantly shorter than that in Group 2 (90.4 ± 36.4 min) (P = 0.04). Patients with an orchidopexy age no more than 10 years old had a higher SRR (79.5%, 31/39) than others (55.9%, 19/34) (P = 0.03). There were no postoperative complications including wound infection, scrotal hematoma, persistent pain, and testicular atrophy during a follow-up period of at least 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study suggests that the stepwise mini-incision mTESE could be a promising approach for sperm retrieval in NOA men with a history of cryptorchidism. While the technique may potentially reduce operation time and surgical invasiveness, further research is needed to validate these findings on a larger scale. The results also suggest that age at orchidopexy may affect SRR and have important implications for the management of cryptorchidism.

摘要

背景

尽管推荐对隐睾症患者进行睾丸固定术以保留男性生育能力,但成年后可能会出现非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)。幸运的是,许多无精子症男性可通过显微外科睾丸精子提取术(mTESE)获取精子。由于睾丸诊断性活检及睾丸固定术时的血管损伤可能造成潜在伤害,在mTESE过程中微创性尤为重要,其目的是减少手术损伤并避免继发性睾丸功能衰竭。本比较研究旨在通过与标准mTESE对比,探讨逐步小切口mTESE技术治疗有隐睾症病史的NOA患者的疗效。

结果

总共73例mTESE手术被分为两组:第1组包括37例采用逐步小切口mTESE进行的手术,而第2组包括36例采用标准mTESE的手术。两组的总体精子获取率(SRR)为68.5%(50/73),第1组(78.4%,29/37)和第2组(58.3%,21/36)的SRR无显著差异(P = 0.1)。此外,第1组46.0%的患者(17/37)在第一个小切口步骤中获取了精子,这也与第2组的总体SRR相当(58.3%,21/36)(P = 0.3)。第1组的手术时间(72.6±33.9分钟)显著短于第2组(90.4±36.4分钟)(P = 0.04)。睾丸固定术年龄不超过10岁的患者的SRR(79.5%,31/39)高于其他患者(55.9%,19/34)(P = 0.03)。在至少6个月的随访期内,未出现包括伤口感染、阴囊血肿、持续性疼痛和睾丸萎缩在内的术后并发症。

结论

总之,我们的研究表明,逐步小切口mTESE可能是一种对有隐睾症病史的NOA男性进行精子获取的有前景的方法。虽然该技术可能潜在地减少手术时间和手术侵袭性,但需要进一步研究以更大规模验证这些发现。结果还表明,睾丸固定术的年龄可能影响SRR,并对隐睾症的管理具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59cd/10433673/ac2477fcb103/12610_2023_196_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验