发表质量改进研究：学会分享与通过分享来学习。
Publishing quality improvement studies: learning to share and sharing to learn.
作者信息
Wagstaff Duncan, Moonesinghe Suneetha Ramani
机构信息
Centre for Perioperative Medicine and Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
出版信息
BJA Open. 2023 Feb 3;5:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100123. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Abstract
This editorial welcomes the decision of to publish quality improvement (QI) studies. It summarises the current problems with conducting, evaluating, and publishing QI studies. It highlights existing guidance for prospective authors to follow regarding the reporting of QI interventions, their context(s), underlying theories, and evaluation. In so doing, we hope to encourage the publication of more QI studies of sufficient quality to facilitate learning or replication elsewhere.
摘要
本社论对[具体对象]发表质量改进（QI）研究的决定表示欢迎。它总结了开展、评估和发表QI研究目前存在的问题。它强调了现有指南，供未来的作者在报告QI干预措施、其背景、基础理论和评估时遵循。通过这样做，我们希望鼓励发表更多质量足够高的QI研究，以促进在其他地方的学习或复制。
相似文献
1
Publishing quality improvement studies: learning to share and sharing to learn.发表质量改进研究：学会分享与通过分享来学习。
BJA Open. 2023 Feb 3;5:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100123. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
A scoping review of local quality improvement using data from UK perioperative National Clinical Audits.一项利用英国围手术期国家临床审计数据进行的地方质量改进范围综述。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 29;11(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00273-0.
3
Strategies for addressing barriers to publishing pediatric quality improvement research.解决儿科质量改进研究出版障碍的策略。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e678-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0809. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
4
Perspective on Publishing Quality Improvement Efforts.出版质量提升工作的视角
Perm J. 2017;21:17-140. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-140.
5
Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.质量改进最低质量标准集（QI-MQCS）的制定：一种用于批判性评价质量改进干预措施出版物的工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):796-804. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
6
Guide to effective quality improvement reporting in radiology.放射科有效质量改进报告指南。
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):561-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131930. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
7
Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: a realist review.成功的医师教育质量改进课程的关键特征：一个现实主义的综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):77-88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002846. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
A practical guide to publishing a quality improvement paper.发表高质量改进论文实用指南。
J Perinatol. 2021 Jun;41(6):1454-1458. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00902-w. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Identifying quality improvement intervention publications--a comparison of electronic search strategies.识别质量改进干预措施出版物——电子检索策略的比较。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 1;6:85. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-85.
引用本文的文献
1
Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.改善中低收入国家重症监护的干预措施：系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):832-848. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07377-9. Epub 2024 May 15.
本文引用的文献
1
A scoping review of local quality improvement using data from UK perioperative National Clinical Audits.一项利用英国围手术期国家临床审计数据进行的地方质量改进范围综述。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 29;11(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00273-0.
2
The delivery plan for tackling the covid-19 backlog of elective care falls short.应对新冠疫情导致的择期护理积压问题的交付计划存在不足。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 19;377:o995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o995.
3
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能：来自六个案例研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Completeness of reporting of quality improvement studies in neonatology is inadequate: a systematic literature survey.新生儿学中质量改进研究报告的完整性不足：系统文献调查。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jun;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001273.
5
Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care.振兴审核和反馈以改善患者护理。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m213.
6
How to improve healthcare improvement-an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods.如何改善医疗保健——玛丽·迪克森 - 伍兹的一篇文章
BMJ. 2019 Oct 1;367:l5514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5514.
7
Identifying and resolving the frustrations of reviewing the improvement literature: The experiences of two improvement researchers.识别并解决查阅改进文献时的困扰：两位改进研究人员的经历。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jul 24;8(3):e000701. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000701. eCollection 2019.
8
Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care.为什么报告质量改进如此困难？一项围手术期护理的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e030269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030269.
9
Does quality improvement improve quality?质量改进能否提升质量？
Future Hosp J. 2016 Oct;3(3):191-194. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191.
10
Quality improvement studies - pitfalls of the before and after study design.质量改进研究——前后研究设计的陷阱
Anaesthesia. 2018 Nov;73(11):1432-1435. doi: 10.1111/anae.14451. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
Zotero 插件