• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术的学习曲线:一项系统评价

The learning curve for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

作者信息

Avendano John P, Sudah Suleiman Y, Gencarelli Pasquale, Imam Nareena, Manzi Joseph E, Ghajar Mina, Menendez Mariano E, Nicholson Allen D

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Department of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.

出版信息

JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Dec 27;3(2):150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.12.001. eCollection 2023 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.12.001
PMID:37588447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10426533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the rising incidence of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) among surgeons, little is known about the learning curve associated with these procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) identify the learning curves associated with ATSA and RTSA, (2) evaluate the effect of the learning curves on clinical outcomes, and (3) determine the number of cases needed to achieve proficiency.

METHODS

Four online databases [PubMed (NLM), MEDLINE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Scopus (Elsevier)] were systematically searched and screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The search included results from the inception of each database to May 18, 2022. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, learning curve analyses, patient reported outcome measures, range of motion, complication rates, and reoperation rates were collected. A quality assessment for each article was performed according to the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies of fair to good quality were included for analysis (one of level II evidence, five of level III, and seven of level IV) with the majority originating from the United States [n = 8, 61.5%]. Overall, there were a total of 3381 cases (1861 RTSA and 1520 ATSA), with a mean patient age of 72.6 years [range: 45-92 years]. From the studies analyzed in this systematic review, for RTSA, the approximate average number of cases surgeons need to perform to move to an acceptable position on the RTSA learning curve is 25 cases. For ATSA, a wider range of 16-86 cases was derived as only two studies reported on ATSA.

CONCLUSION

Progression along the learning curve for RTSA and ATSA results in decreased operative times, improved patient-reported outcomes, and fewer complications. However, a true learning curve is difficult to quantify given the heterogeneity of reported outcome measures, individual surgeon experience at the time of data collection, and statistical analyses used across studies.

摘要

背景

尽管解剖型全肩关节置换术(ATSA)和反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)在外科医生中的发病率不断上升,但对于这些手术相关的学习曲线却知之甚少。本系统评价的目的是:(1)确定与ATSA和RTSA相关的学习曲线;(2)评估学习曲线对临床结果的影响;(3)确定达到熟练程度所需的病例数。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,对四个在线数据库[PubMed(NLM)、MEDLINE(OVID)、Cochrane图书馆(Wiley)和Scopus(Elsevier)]进行系统检索和筛选。检索范围包括每个数据库创建之初至2022年5月18日的结果。收集有关研究特征、患者人口统计学、学习曲线分析、患者报告的结局指标、活动范围、并发症发生率和再次手术率的数据。根据非随机研究方法学指数标准对每篇文章进行质量评估。

结果

共纳入13项质量中等至良好的研究进行分析(二级证据1项,三级证据5项,四级证据7项),其中大部分来自美国[n = 8,61.5%]。总体而言,共有3381例病例(1861例RTSA和1520例ATSA),患者平均年龄为72.6岁[范围:45 - 92岁]。从本系统评价分析的研究来看,对于RTSA,外科医生要在RTSA学习曲线上达到可接受水平,大约平均需要进行25例手术。对于ATSA,由于仅有两项研究报告了ATSA,得出的范围较宽,为16 - 86例。

结论

沿着RTSA和ATSA的学习曲线进展会导致手术时间缩短、患者报告的结局改善以及并发症减少。然而,鉴于报告的结局指标的异质性、数据收集时个体外科医生的经验以及各研究使用的统计分析方法,真正的学习曲线难以量化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d740/10426533/e71e91a43561/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d740/10426533/e71e91a43561/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d740/10426533/e71e91a43561/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
The learning curve for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术的学习曲线:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2022 Dec 27;3(2):150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.12.001. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术相关并发症类型和发生率的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.初次解剖型全肩关节置换术失败后翻修反置式全肩关节置换术与初次反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果的比较。
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 16;7(2):257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) more advantageous than anatomic TSA (aTSA) for osteoarthritis with intact cuff tendon? A systematic review and meta-analysis.反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)在肩袖完整的骨关节炎中是否优于解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jan 6;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00625-y.
5
Outcomes of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients over the age of 70: a systematic review.70岁以上患者解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术的疗效:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Mar 4;3(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Characteristics of anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients who achieve ceiling scores with 3 common patient-reported outcome measures.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术患者中达到 3 种常用患者报告结局测量评分上限的特征。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1647-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.142. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
7
Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Aged Over 70 Without a Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.70岁以上无全层肩袖撕裂患者的解剖型全肩关节置换术与反式全肩关节置换术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2023 Oct 6;7:24715492231206685. doi: 10.1177/24715492231206685. eCollection 2023.
8
Volume, indications, and number of surgeons performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty continue to expand: a nationwide cohort analysis from 2016-2020.进行反式全肩关节置换术的手术量、适应证及外科医生数量持续增加:一项2016 - 2020年的全国队列分析。
JSES Int. 2023 May 25;7(5):827-834. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
A Comparison and Correlation of Clinical Outcome Metrics in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.解剖型与反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果指标的比较与相关性
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73 Suppl 1:S118-23.
10
A Comparison of Revision Rates for Osteoarthritis of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Primary Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cemented All-polyethylene Glenoid: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.原发性反式全肩关节置换术与骨水泥固定全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体行原发性解剖型肩关节置换术治疗原发性骨关节炎的翻修率比较:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2216-2224. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001869.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Utilization of Primary Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Single High-Volume Institution: A Retrospective Cohort Study.单一高容量机构中原发性解剖型和反肩关节置换术使用情况的变化:一项回顾性队列研究
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Sep 3;17:421-426. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S515073. eCollection 2025.
2
Reverse versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: A large matched cohort analysis.反向与解剖型全肩关节置换术:一项大型配对队列分析。
J Orthop. 2024 Jun 24;58:35-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.029. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Contemporary analysis of the learning curve for robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty emerging technologies.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual Surgeon Operating in Reverse Geometry Total Shoulder Replacement: The Learning Curve and Its Effects on Complication Rates.双外科医生进行反向几何全肩关节置换术:学习曲线及其对并发症发生率的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 20;14(3):e23337. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23337. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
The Impact of Surgeon Variability on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty.外科医生变异性对全髋关节置换术患者报告结局的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S479-S487.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.100. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Surgical learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures.
机器人辅助全髋关节置换术新技术学习曲线的当代分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 5;18(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01928-4.
肱骨近端骨折反肩关节置换术的手术学习曲线
JSES Int. 2021 Oct 9;5(6):1034-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.008. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Wide variability of shoulder and elbow case volume in orthopedic surgery residency.骨科住院医师培训中肩肘病例量的广泛差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Feb;31(2):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.023. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
The effect of operative time on early postoperative complications in total shoulder arthroplasty: An analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.手术时间对全肩关节置换术后早期并发症的影响:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库分析
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Feb;13(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/1758573219876573. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.直接前路全髋关节置换术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2021 Aug;45(8):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-04986-7. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
7
Operative duration-based learning period analysis for reverse and total shoulder arthroplasty: A multicenter study.基于手术时长的反向和全肩关节置换术学习期分析:一项多中心研究。
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):23-30. doi: 10.1177/1758573218811635. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术相关并发症类型和发生率的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Trends in open shoulder surgery among early career orthopedic surgeons: who is doing what?早期骨科医生的开放式肩关节手术趋势:谁在做什么?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):e269-e278. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.075. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
10
Computer navigation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical trial to evaluate the learning curve.计算机导航下全肩关节置换术中盂肱关节假体的安装:评估学习曲线的临床试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):617-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Oct 21.