• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术相关并发症类型和发生率的比较。

Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

机构信息

Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.

Bordeaux Merignac Sports Clinic, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028
PMID:32763380
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complications after anatomic (aTSA) and reverse (rTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty can be devastating to a patient's quality of life and require revisions that are costly to both the patient and the health care system. The purpose of this study is to determine the types, incidence, and timing of complications following aTSA and rTSA using an international database of patients who received a single-platform total shoulder arthroplasty system, in order to quantify the types of failure modes and the differences that occur between aTSA and rTSA.

METHODS

A total of 2224 aTSA (male-female, 1090:1134) and 4158 rTSA (male-female, 1478:2680) patients were enrolled in an international database of primary shoulder arthroplasty performed by 40 different surgeons in the United States and Europe. Adverse events and revisions reported for these 6382 patients were analyzed to identify the most common failure modes associated for both aTSA and rTSA.

RESULTS

For the 2224 aTSA patients, 239 adverse events were reported for a complication rate of 10.7% and 124 revisions for a revision rate of 5.6%. The top 3 complications for aTSA were rotator cuff tear/subscapularis failure (n = 69; complication rate = 3.1%, revision rate = 1.9%), aseptic glenoid loosening (n = 55; complication rate = 2.5%, revision rate = 1.9%), and infection (n = 28; complication rate = 1.3%, revision rate = 0.8%). For the 4158 rTSA patients, 372 adverse events were reported for a complication rate of 8.9% and 104 revisions for a revision rate of 2.5%. The top 3 complications for rTSA were acromial/scapular fracture/pain (n = 102; complication rate = 2.5%, revision rate = 0.0%), instability (n = 60; complication rate = 1.4%, revision rate = 1.0%), and pain (n = 49; complication rate = 1.2%, revision rate = 0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This large database analysis quantified complication and revision rates for aTSA and rTSA. We found aTSA and rTSA complication rates of 10.7% and 8.9%, respectively; with revision surgery rates of 5.6% and 2.5%, respectively. The 2 most common complications for each prosthesis type (aTSA: subscapularis/rotator cuff tears, aseptic glenoid loosening; rTSA: acromial/scapular fractures, instability) were unique to each device. The rate of infection was similar for both. Future prosthesis and technique development should work to mitigate these common complication types in order to reduce their rate of occurrence.

摘要

背景

解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)和反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)后的并发症可能对患者的生活质量造成严重影响,需要进行翻修,这对患者和医疗保健系统来说都是昂贵的。本研究的目的是使用接受单平台全肩关节置换系统的患者国际数据库,确定 aTSA 和 rTSA 后的并发症类型、发生率和发生时间,以便量化失效模式的类型以及 aTSA 和 rTSA 之间发生的差异。

方法

共纳入 2224 例 aTSA(男女比例为 1090:1134)和 4158 例 rTSA(男女比例为 1478:2680)患者,这些患者均由美国和欧洲的 40 位不同外科医生在国际数据库中进行了初次肩关节置换。对这些 6382 例患者报告的不良事件和翻修情况进行分析,以确定与 aTSA 和 rTSA 相关的最常见失效模式。

结果

对于 2224 例 aTSA 患者,报告了 239 例不良事件,并发症发生率为 10.7%,翻修率为 5.6%。aTSA 的前 3 种并发症为肩袖撕裂/肩胛下肌失败(n = 69;并发症发生率 = 3.1%,翻修率 = 1.9%)、无菌性肩胛盂松动(n = 55;并发症发生率 = 2.5%,翻修率 = 1.9%)和感染(n = 28;并发症发生率 = 1.3%,翻修率 = 0.8%)。对于 4158 例 rTSA 患者,报告了 372 例不良事件,并发症发生率为 8.9%,翻修率为 2.5%。rTSA 的前 3 种并发症为肩峰/肩胛骨折/疼痛(n = 102;并发症发生率 = 2.5%,翻修率 = 0.0%)、不稳定(n = 60;并发症发生率 = 1.4%,翻修率 = 1.0%)和疼痛(n = 49;并发症发生率 = 1.2%,翻修率 = 0.2%)。

结论

这项大型数据库分析量化了 aTSA 和 rTSA 的并发症和翻修率。我们发现 aTSA 和 rTSA 的并发症发生率分别为 10.7%和 8.9%,翻修手术率分别为 5.6%和 2.5%。每种假体类型(aTSA:肩胛下肌/肩袖撕裂、无菌性肩胛盂松动;rTSA:肩峰/肩胛骨折、不稳定)的 2 种最常见并发症是各自器械特有的。两种假体的感染率相似。未来的假体和技术发展应努力减轻这些常见并发症类型,以降低其发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术相关并发症类型和发生率的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
2
Comparison of Survivorship and Failure Modes Between Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Across Multiple Government Joint Registries for a Single Platform Shoulder System.多种政府关节登记处中同一平台肩部系统的解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后的生存情况和失败模式比较。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2023 Jun;81(2):141-150.
3
A Comparison and Correlation of Clinical Outcome Metrics in Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.解剖型与反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果指标的比较与相关性
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73 Suppl 1:S118-23.
4
Risk factors for complications and revision surgery after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后并发症和翻修手术的风险因素。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Nov;30(11):e689-e701. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.029. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Post-Capsulorrhaphy Arthropathy.解剖型全肩关节置换术与反置式全肩关节置换术治疗关节囊缝合术后关节病的比较
Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;41(5):275-280. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180724-05. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Exactech Equinoxe anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: case controlled comparisons using the machine learning-derived Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score.Exactech Equinoxe 解剖型与反式全肩关节置换治疗原发性骨关节炎:使用机器学习衍生的肩关节置换智能评分进行病例对照比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Apr;32(4):793-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
7
A Comparison of Revision Rates for Osteoarthritis of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Primary Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cemented All-polyethylene Glenoid: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.原发性反式全肩关节置换术与骨水泥固定全聚乙烯肩胛盂假体行原发性解剖型肩关节置换术治疗原发性骨关节炎的翻修率比较:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2216-2224. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001869.
8
Prognostic value of the Walch classification for patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.Walch分类法对肩袖完整的骨关节炎患者行肩关节置换术前及术后的预后价值。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan;33(1):108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
9
Comparison of Reverse and Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With an Intact Rotator Cuff and No Previous Surgery.在未接受过手术且肩袖完整的患者中,反式和解剖全肩关节置换术的比较。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct 1;30(19):941-948. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00014.
10
Two-year clinical outcomes and complication rates in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implanted with Exactech GPS intraoperative navigation.采用Exactech GPS术中导航植入的解剖型和反肩关节置换术的两年临床疗效及并发症发生率
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Dec;32(12):2519-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.021. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Inlay Glenoid Components for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review.解剖型全肩关节置换术中嵌体盂部件的进展:综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5820. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165820.
2
Complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 45 years and younger.45岁及以下患者肩关节置换术后的并发症发生率。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 May 23;5(3):371-375. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.05.001. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
The Subscapularis-Sparing Windowed Anterior Technique (SWAT) for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
用于解剖型全肩关节置换术的保留肩胛下肌的开窗前入路技术(SWAT)
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00007. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of pegged vs. keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: A matched cohort study.全肩关节置换术中带栓与带龙骨的肩胛盂假体的长期临床和影像学结果:一项配对队列研究。
J Orthop. 2025 Jun 18;65:290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.010. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Evaluating the incidence and associated factors of subscapularis failure following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.评估解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩胛下肌功能障碍的发生率及相关因素:一项系统综述
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 19;35(1):258. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04388-0.
6
A causal Bayesian model to evaluate shoulder pathology effect on glenoid bone mineral density.一种用于评估肩部病变对肩胛盂骨密度影响的因果贝叶斯模型。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 4;20(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05983-x.
7
Risk factors associated with pain while sleeping on the affected shoulder after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.初次反肩关节置换术后患侧肩部睡眠时疼痛的相关危险因素。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025 Jun;28(2):204-212. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.01067. Epub 2025 May 23.
8
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Disease Burden, Current Understanding, and Gaps in Knowledge and Treatment.肩肱关节骨关节炎:疾病负担、当前认知以及知识和治疗方面的差距
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 19;13(5):23259671251339428. doi: 10.1177/23259671251339428. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly.老年人的肩关节置换术
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 19;65:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102976. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Anatomic versus reverse shoulder replacement: Are we asking the right questions and what are the answers?解剖型与反置式肩关节置换:我们问对问题了吗?答案是什么?
J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Feb 4;17(3):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100225. eCollection 2025 May.