Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 10;103(37):2912-2920. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230724-00076.
In order to continuously promote the evaluation of Chinese guidelines and consensus, the Working Group on the Scientific, Transparent and Applicable Rankings (STAR) for guidelines has developed a comprehensive guideline evaluation system based on the previous work. The STAR working group established 37 specialty committees, organized 508 members, and evaluated 334 Chinese guidelines and 1 143 Chinese consensus published in medical journals in 2022. The evaluation results showed that the average score of guidelines was 43.4, with a 36.1% improvement compared to 2021. The average score of consensus was 28.3, with a 24.7% improvement compared to 2021. The compliance rate of some items ("Identify how the guideline protocol is accessible from an open-source platform""Describe the role of funder(s) in the guideline development"and"Provide tailored editions of the guidelines for different groups of target users") were generally low and need to be further improved. The STAR Working Group will publish the evaluation and ranking results in relevant journals or platforms, and further update and improve the comprehensive evaluation system.
为持续推动中国指南和共识的评价工作，指南科学、透明与适用排名（STAR）工作组在以往工作基础上，开发了一套全面的指南评价体系。STAR工作组设立了37个专业委员会，组织了508名成员，对2022年发表在医学期刊上的334项中国指南和1143项中国共识进行了评价。评价结果显示，指南的平均得分为43.4分，较2021年提高了36.1%。共识的平均得分为28.3分，较2021年提高了24.7%。部分条目（“说明如何从开源平台获取指南方案”“描述资助者在指南制定中的作用”以及“为不同目标用户群体提供指南的定制版本”）的合规率普遍较低，有待进一步提高。STAR工作组将在相关期刊或平台上公布评价和排名结果，并进一步更新和完善综合评价体系。
