Perry Kristin J, Perhamus Gretchen R, Memba Gabriela, Ostrov Jamie M, Murray-Close Dianna
Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University.
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
Sch Psychol. 2024 Jan;39(1):95-105. doi: 10.1037/spq0000565. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Understanding classroom-level correlates of preschool children's aggressive behavior is critical to identifying multiple avenues for intervention within schools. The present school-based study evaluated the reliability and validity of a classroom-level measure of physical and relational aggression and examined a social-ecological model to test whether individual variables (i.e., temperament), dyadic peer factors (i.e., peer victimization, the number of a child's play partners), and classroom-level aggression were associated with individual aggression. Observations of play partners and teacher reports of temperament (i.e., daring, prosociality, and negative emotionality), peer victimization (i.e., physical and relational victimization), and classroom aggression were collected in a sample of preschoolers ( = 307; = 48.99 months, = 7.51). Observer reports of aggression were used to create aggression severity and directionality scores, reflecting the overall level of aggression a child displays and their propensity to use physical relative to relational aggression, respectively. There was evidence to support the reliability and validity of the classroom-level aggression measure providing initial support that this measure could be used by school psychologists. A multilevel regression model indicated that higher levels of negative emotionality, daring, and a greater number of play partners were associated with higher levels of aggression severity. Children in classrooms with more relational aggression were more likely to use relational instead of physical aggression. These findings demonstrate the importance for school psychologists to account for multiple levels of influence when examining preschoolers' aggression. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
了解学龄前儿童攻击行为在课堂层面的相关因素,对于确定学校内多种干预途径至关重要。本项基于学校的研究评估了一种课堂层面的身体攻击和关系攻击测量方法的信效度,并检验了一个社会生态模型,以测试个体变量(即气质)、二元同伴因素(即同伴受害、儿童玩伴数量)和课堂层面的攻击行为是否与个体攻击行为相关。在一个学龄前儿童样本(n = 307;M = 48.99个月,SD = 7.51)中,收集了对玩伴的观察数据以及教师对气质(即大胆、亲社会行为和负面情绪)、同伴受害(即身体和关系受害)和课堂攻击行为的报告。观察者对攻击行为的报告被用于创建攻击严重程度和方向性得分,分别反映儿童表现出的攻击行为的总体水平以及他们使用身体攻击相对于关系攻击的倾向。有证据支持课堂层面攻击行为测量方法的信效度,为学校心理学家可以使用该测量方法提供了初步支持。一个多层次回归模型表明,较高水平的负面情绪、大胆程度以及较多的玩伴数量与较高水平的攻击严重程度相关。在关系攻击行为较多的课堂中的儿童更有可能使用关系攻击而非身体攻击。这些发现表明,学校心理学家在研究学龄前儿童的攻击行为时考虑多个影响层面的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)