Thibault Thomas, Rajillah Abdessamad, Bourredjem Abderrahmane, Corneloup Marie, Maurier François, Wahl Denis, Muller Geraldine, Aumaitre Olivier, Sève Pascal, Blaison Gilles, Besancenot Jean-François, Martin Thierry, Magy-Bertrand Nadine, Samson Maxime, Arnaud Laurent, Amoura Zahir, Devilliers Hervé
Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases Unit, University Hospital Dijon-Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Clinical Investigation Center, INSERM CIC-EC 1432, University Hospital Dijon-Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 May 2;63(5):1447-1455. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead407.
To measure the association between SLE remission and scores of patients-reported outcome (PRO) measures.
We performed a prospective cohort study of SLE patients with a 2-year follow-up, using Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life (SLEQOL) and 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires. Remission was defined as remission off treatment (ROFT) and remission on treatment (RONT) according to the definitions of remission in SLE consensus. Mixed models accounting for repeated measures were used to compare groups as follow: ROFT and RONT vs no remission and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) vs no LLDAS.
A total of 1478 medical visits and 2547 PRO questionnaires were collected during the follow-up from the 336 recruited patients. A between-group difference in PRO scores reaching at least 5 points on a 0-100 scale was obtained in the following domains: lupus symptoms (LLDAS: +5 points on the 0-100 scale, RONT: +9, ROFT: +5), lupus medication (LLDAS: +5, RONT: +8, ROFT: +9), pain vitality (LLDAS: +6, RONT: +9, ROFT: +6) of LupusPRO; role emotional (LLDAS: +5, RONT: +8), role physical (RONT: +7 and ROFT: +7), bodily pain (RONT: +6), mental health (RONT: +5) and social functioning (RONT: +6) of SF-36. In contrast, a between-group difference reaching at least 5 points was not achieved for any of the LupusQoL and SLEQOL domains.
RONT, ROFT and LLDAS were associated with significant and clinically relevant higher QoL in most PRO domains of the LupusPRO (disease specific) and SF-36 (generic) questionnaires, but not with LupusQoL and SLEQOL disease-specific questionnaires.
测量系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)缓解与患者报告结局(PRO)指标得分之间的关联。
我们对SLE患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,随访2年,使用狼疮患者报告结局(LupusPRO)、狼疮生活质量(LupusQoL)、系统性红斑狼疮生活质量(SLEQOL)和36项简明健康调查问卷(SF - 36)。根据SLE共识中的缓解定义,缓解被定义为治疗停药缓解(ROFT)和治疗中缓解(RONT)。采用考虑重复测量的混合模型对各组进行比较,如下:ROFT和RONT与未缓解组比较,狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)与非LLDAS组比较。
在随访期间,从336名招募的患者中总共收集了1478次医疗就诊信息和2547份PRO问卷。在以下领域获得了组间差异,即在0 - 100分制中PRO得分至少相差5分:LupusPRO的狼疮症状(LLDAS:0 - 100分制中增加5分,RONT:增加9分,ROFT:增加5分)、狼疮用药(LLDAS:增加5分,RONT:增加8分,ROFT:增加9分)、疼痛活力(LLDAS:增加6分,RONT:增加9分,ROFT:增加6分);SF - 36的角色情感(LLDAS:增加5分,RONT:增加8分)、角色生理(RONT:增加7分,ROFT:增加7分)、身体疼痛(RONT:增加6分)、心理健康(RONT:增加5分)和社会功能(RONT:增加6分)。相比之下,LupusQoL和SLEQOL的任何领域均未实现组间差异至少达到5分。
RONT、ROFT和LLDAS与LupusPRO(疾病特异性)和SF - 36(通用)问卷的大多数PRO领域中显著且具有临床相关性的更高生活质量相关,但与LupusQoL和SLEQOL疾病特异性问卷无关。