Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):14785-14796. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed.
Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3-4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed.
Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group.
The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse.
尽管局部晚期胃食管腺癌的多模式治疗有所改善,但大多数患者仍会复发。结构化随访对早期发现复发的影响尚不清楚,存在争议。
2009 年至 2021 年间,接受新辅助/围手术期化疗后行肿瘤切除术的局部晚期胃食管腺癌患者接受了结构化随访,在前 2 年每 3 个月进行一次影像学检查,然后在第 3 至 4 年和第 5 年分别每半年和每年进行一次检查。分析临床结果,包括复发模式和时间点。
本分析纳入 257 例患者。50.2%(n=129)的患者诊断为复发性疾病,其中大多数(94.6%)在 2 年内复发。复发最常见的部位是淋巴结转移,其次是腹膜转移、肝转移和肺转移。52.7%的患者在复发时出现症状。经新辅助治疗后肿瘤淋巴结阳性(ypN+)的患者(高危组)与原发肿瘤淋巴结阴性(ypN0)的患者(低危组)的复发累积风险和时间点存在显著差异。高危患者的无疾病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)显著较差,分别为 11.1 和 29.0 个月,而低危组的中位 DFS 和 OS 尚未达到。
高危和低危患者的复发风险差异显著。只有一部分复发与临床症状有关。考虑到复发的个体风险,建议对高危和低危患者采用个体化随访策略。