Suppr超能文献

自述有终身和获得性射精困难的男性之间的相似点和差异。

Similarities and differences between men with self-reported lifelong and acquired difficulty reaching ejaculation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN, USA.

Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2024 Sep;36(6):592-600. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00752-y. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Abstract

Men with delayed ejaculation are often categorized into lifelong and acquired subtypes, yet little is known about similarities and differences between these groups. In this study, we examined whether delayed ejaculation subtypes differed on various demographic, diagnostic, relationship, and sexual activity/satisfaction variables. We drew 140 men reporting moderately-severe to severe difficulty reaching ejaculation during partnered sex (occurring during ≥75% of sexual events) from a convenience sample of over 3000 respondents obtained through an opt-in, multinational, online survey. Respondents were further classified as having lifelong or acquired delayed ejaculation based on self-report. A series of alpha-adjusted analyses of covariance were then made between subtypes on subsets of variables. In addition, the extent to which two potential confounding variables, age and erectile function, might have been responsible for subtype differences was explored. Results indicated that compared with men with acquired delayed ejaculation, men with lifelong delayed ejaculation were younger (28.6 vs 44.7 years, η = 0.30, P < 0.001), reported greater delayed ejaculation symptomology (4.31 vs 3.98, P < 0.01, η = 0.02), were less likely to attribute their problem to a medical issue or medication (1.7% vs 12.2%, P < 0.05), and more likely to masturbate for anxiety/distress reduction than for pleasure. In contrast, delayed ejaculation subtype differences related to masturbation frequency, pornography use during masturbation, and condom use disappeared when age and erectile functioning differences were statistically controlled. Overall, lifelong and acquired delayed ejaculation subtypes showed more similarities than differences. Findings worthy of clinical note were the lower level of endorsement of medical issues/medication by the lifelong subtype, their higher level of delayed ejaculation symptomology, and-despite a high level of anxiety/distress reported by both groups-their particular vulnerability to anxiety/distress as indicated by their strong motive to masturbate for anxiety/distress reduction (44.3% vs 19.6%, P < 0.05). Other differences between delayed ejaculation subtypes were better explained by group differences in age and erectile function than by subtype membership per se.

摘要

延迟射精的男性通常分为终身和获得性两种亚型,但对于这两种类型之间的相似和不同之处知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们检查了延迟射精的两种亚型在各种人口统计学、诊断、关系和性活动/满意度变量上是否存在差异。我们从超过 3000 名通过选入、多国在线调查获得的应答者中抽取了 140 名报告在伴有伴侣的性行为中出现中度至重度射精困难(在≥75%的性事件中发生)的男性。根据自我报告,应答者进一步被分类为具有终身或获得性延迟射精。然后,对亚型之间的变量子集进行了一系列经过 alpha 调整的协方差分析。此外,还探讨了两个潜在的混杂变量——年龄和勃起功能——可能导致亚型差异的程度。结果表明,与获得性延迟射精的男性相比,具有终身延迟射精的男性年龄更小(28.6 岁比 44.7 岁,η=0.30,P<0.001),报告的延迟射精症状更严重(4.31 比 3.98,P<0.01,η=0.02),不太可能将问题归因于医疗问题或药物(1.7%比 12.2%,P<0.05),更有可能通过自慰来减轻焦虑/压力,而不是为了获得愉悦。相比之下,当控制年龄和勃起功能差异时,与自慰频率、自慰时使用色情制品和使用避孕套相关的延迟射精亚型差异消失了。总体而言,终身和获得性延迟射精的亚型之间的相似之处多于差异。值得临床注意的发现是,终身亚型对医疗问题/药物的认可程度较低,他们的延迟射精症状水平较高,而且——尽管两组都报告了很高的焦虑/压力——他们对焦虑/压力的特别脆弱性,这表现在他们强烈的通过自慰来减轻焦虑/压力的动机(44.3%比 19.6%,P<0.05)。延迟射精的两种亚型之间的其他差异可以更好地用年龄和勃起功能的组间差异来解释,而不是用亚型本身来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验