School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 501 St Paul St, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 17;28(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01256-7.
Unscheduled return visits (URVs) to the emergency department (ED) constitute a crucial indicator of patient care quality.
We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients who visited the ED with abdominal pain and to identify the risk of URVs with admission (URVAs) from URVs without admission (URVNAs).
This retrospective study included adult patients who visited the ED of Taipei Medical University Hospital because of abdominal pain and revisited in 72 h over a 5-year period (January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for URVAs and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of variables predicting URVAs and the optimal cut-off points for the variables. In addition, a classification and regression tree (CART)-based scoring system was used for predicting risk of URVA.
Of 702 eligible patients with URVs related to abdominal pain, 249 had URVAs (35.5%). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for URVAs during the index visit included execution of laboratory tests (yes vs no: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.32; 95% CI 2.99-6.23), older age (≥ 40 vs < 40 years: AOR, 2.10; 95% CI 1.10-1.34), Level 1-2 triage scores (Levels 1-2 vs Levels 3-5: AOR, 2.30; 95% CI 1.26-4.19), and use of ≥ 2 analgesics (≥ 2 vs < 2: AOR, 2.90; 95% CI 1.58-5.30). ROC curve analysis results revealed the combination of these 4 above variables resulted in acceptable performance (area under curve: 0.716). The above 4 variables were used in the CART model to evaluate URVA propensity.
Elder patients with abdominal pain who needed laboratory workup, had Level 1-2 triage scores, and received ≥ 2 doses of analgesics during their index visits to the ED had higher risk of URVAs.
非计划性急诊科复诊(URV)是患者医疗质量的重要指标。
分析因腹痛至急诊科就诊患者的临床特征,并确定有住院需求的 URV(URVA)与无住院需求的 URV(URVNAs)之间的风险差异。
本回顾性研究纳入了 5 年内(2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日)因腹痛至台北医学大学附属医院急诊科就诊且在 72 小时内复诊的成年患者。采用多变量逻辑回归分析识别 URVAs 的风险因素,并进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定预测 URVAs 的变量的效能及最佳截断值。此外,还采用分类回归树(CART)评分系统预测 URVA 风险。
在 702 例因腹痛接受 URV 的合格患者中,249 例有 URVAs(35.5%)。多变量分析显示,就诊时 URVAs 的风险因素包括实验室检查的执行(是 vs 否:调整后优势比 [OR],4.32;95%置信区间 [CI] 2.99-6.23)、年龄较大(≥40 岁 vs <40 岁:OR,2.10;95%CI 1.10-1.34)、1-2 级分诊评分(1-2 级 vs 3-5 级:OR,2.30;95%CI 1.26-4.19)和使用≥2 种镇痛药(≥2 种 vs <2 种:OR,2.90;95%CI 1.58-5.30)。ROC 曲线分析结果表明,上述 4 个变量的组合具有可接受的性能(曲线下面积:0.716)。在 CART 模型中,上述 4 个变量用于评估 URVA 倾向。
急诊科就诊的腹痛老年患者,需要进行实验室检查,1-2 级分诊评分,且在就诊时使用≥2 剂镇痛药,其 URVAs 风险更高。