• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科72小时复诊入院的危险因素。

Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department.

作者信息

Liu Sung-Wei

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Tzu Chi Med J. 2020 Dec 24;33(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20
PMID:33912415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8059464/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Return visit to emergency department (ED) is a common phenomenon and has been a clinical indicator of quality of care in ED. Most of previous articles focused on the characteristics of the patients returning within 72 h after ED discharge, while those on subsequent admission are numbered. This study's purpose is to identify risk factors for admission among 72-h return visit in the ED adult population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. The study period was from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. We excluded patients who left against medical advice or without being seen, who was admitted or transferred at the index ED visit, whose medical records were incomplete, and whose age was below 18 years old. Significant variables were selected based on univariate analysis and later entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for 72-h return admission.

RESULTS

We identified 1575 eligible visits, and there were 1,119 visits entering into the final analysis. Male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44), ambulance-transport at return visit (OR = 3.68), senior staff (OR = 1.52), work-up (OR = 3.03), and longer length of stay (LOS) were associated with higher risks of admission among ED 72-h return visits. Age, comorbidity, mode of transport at index visit, consultation, triage, type of illness, outpatient department visit between ED visits, and interval between index and return visits were not significantly associated with return admission.

CONCLUSION

Gender, mode of transportation, staff experience, check-up, and LOS are associated with ED return admission.

摘要

目的

急诊复诊是一种常见现象,一直是急诊科医疗质量的临床指标。以往大多数文章关注的是急诊出院后72小时内复诊患者的特征,而关于后续再次入院的文章则较少。本研究旨在确定急诊科成年患者72小时复诊后再次入院的危险因素。

材料与方法

本回顾性队列研究在台湾东部的一家医疗中心进行。研究期间为2013年1月1日至2013年12月31日。我们排除了擅自离院或未就诊、在首次急诊就诊时入院或转院、病历不完整以及年龄低于18岁的患者。基于单因素分析选择显著变量,随后将其纳入多因素逻辑回归分析,以确定72小时复诊后再次入院的危险因素。

结果

我们确定了1575例符合条件的就诊病例,其中1119例纳入最终分析。男性(比值比[OR]=1.44)、复诊时救护车转运(OR=3.68)、高级医护人员(OR=1.52)、检查(OR=3.03)以及住院时间较长与急诊科72小时复诊后再次入院的较高风险相关。年龄、合并症、首次就诊时的交通方式、会诊、分诊、疾病类型、两次急诊就诊之间的门诊就诊情况以及首次就诊与复诊之间的间隔时间与再次入院无显著关联。

结论

性别、交通方式、医护人员经验、检查及住院时间与急诊复诊后再次入院有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f361/8059464/ab1970da3ad7/TCMJ-33-169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f361/8059464/ab1970da3ad7/TCMJ-33-169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f361/8059464/ab1970da3ad7/TCMJ-33-169-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department.急诊科72小时复诊入院的危险因素。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2020 Dec 24;33(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
2
In-Hospital Outcomes and Costs Among Patients Hospitalized During a Return Visit to the Emergency Department.急诊科复诊住院患者的院内结局与费用
JAMA. 2016 Feb 16;315(7):663-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0649.
3
The effect of direct admission to acute geriatric units compared to admission after an emergency department visit on length of stay, postacute care transfers and ED return visits.直接收治到急性老年病科与急诊就诊后收治相比,对住院时间、急性后期护理转科和急诊再就诊的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 4;22(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03241-x.
4
Unscheduled return visits with and without admission post emergency department discharge.急诊科出院后计划外的复诊,包括复诊时是否再次入院。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):1110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.01.062. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
5
In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after a Return Visit to the Emergency Department.急诊复诊后入住重症监护病房患者的院内结局
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;9(4):431. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040431.
6
Predictors and outcomes of patients that return unplanned to the Emergency Department and require critical care admission: A multicenter study.计划外返回急诊并需要重症监护病房收治的患者的预测因素和结局:一项多中心研究。
Australas Emerg Care. 2022 Mar;25(1):88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Return Visit Admissions May Not Indicate Quality of Emergency Department Care for Children.复诊入院并不能表明儿科急诊护理质量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):283-292. doi: 10.1111/acem.13324. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Clinical Characteristics Associated with Return Visits to the Emergency Department after COVID-19 Diagnosis.临床特征与 COVID-19 诊断后急诊复诊相关。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 5;22(6):1257-1261. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.52824.
9
Children admitted to the hospital after returning to the emergency department within 72 hours.在72小时内返回急诊科后入院的儿童。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Sep;27(9):808-11. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822c1273.
10
Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study.与急诊高危复诊相关的因素:病例交叉研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 1;28(5):394-401. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000851.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident clinical dashboards to support precision education in emergency medicine.支持急诊医学精准教育的住院医师临床仪表盘。
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Apr 29;9(Suppl 1):S29-S39. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70020. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Unplanned re-attendance to emergency department of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a situational analysis.全身炎症反应综合征患者非计划性重返急诊科:情境分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12371-y.
3
Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.

本文引用的文献

1
Large observational study on risks predicting emergency department return visits and associated disposition deviations.关于预测急诊科复诊风险及相关处置偏差的大型观察性研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;6(2):144-151. doi: 10.15441/ceem.18.024. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Predictors of Admission in Adult Unscheduled Return Visits to the Emergency Department.成人非计划性急诊复诊入院的预测因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):912-918. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38225. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Independent determinants of prolonged emergency department length of stay in a tertiary care centre: a prospective cohort study.
基于机器学习算法的高危急诊科复诊预测:概念验证研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 22;31(1):e100859. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100859.
4
The risk factors of the 72-h unscheduled return visit admission to emergency department in adults below 50 years old.50 岁以下成年人急诊 72 小时内非计划性再次就诊的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;28(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01317-x.
5
Predictors of 72-h unscheduled return visits with admission in patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain.以腹痛为主诉至急诊科就诊患者 72 小时内非计划性再就诊并入院的预测因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 17;28(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01256-7.
6
High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.
独立决定因素对三级护理中心急诊停留时间延长的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 20;26(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0547-5.
4
Bouncing Back Elsewhere: Multilevel Analysis of Return Visits to the Same or a Different Hospital After Initial Emergency Department Presentation.在其他地方反弹:初始急诊科就诊后再次返回同一或不同医院的多水平分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Which unscheduled return visits indicate a quality-of-care issue?哪些非计划内的复诊表明存在护理质量问题?
Emerg Med J. 2017 Mar;34(3):145-150. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205603. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital.新加坡一家三级医院急诊科72小时内复诊患者的特征。
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jun;57(6):301-6. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016104.
7
Discharge Against Medical Advice From the Emergency Department: Results From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Beirut, Lebanon.黎巴嫩贝鲁特一家三级护理医院急诊科的违反医疗建议出院情况:结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2788. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002788.
8
Comparison of the International Crowding Measure in Emergency Departments (ICMED) and the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS) to measure emergency department crowding: pilot study.急诊科国际拥挤度测量指标(ICMED)与国家急诊科拥挤度评分(NEDOCS)用于测量急诊科拥挤情况的比较:一项试点研究。
Emerg Med J. 2016 May;33(5):307-12. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203616. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Organisational Factors Induce Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay in Elderly Patients--A Retrospective Cohort Study.组织因素导致老年患者急诊科住院时间延长——一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135066. eCollection 2015.
10
Crowding measures associated with the quality of emergency department care: a systematic review.与急诊科护理质量相关的拥挤措施:一项系统综述
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(6):643-56. doi: 10.1111/acem.12682. Epub 2015 May 20.