Saltzman Amanda, Hebert Kristi, Prats Samantha, Richman Ashley, Togami Joanna, Rickey Leslie, Montgomery Melissa
Department of Urology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation and University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School (MM), New Orleans, Louisiana.
Departments of Urology and Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine (LR), New Haven, Connecticut.
Urol Pract. 2016 Jul;3(4):302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
We examined trends in the mentorship and career choices of women urologists.
An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to 1,563 women urologists in January 2015. Descriptive data are presented as the percent and mean.
Of the 1,563 emails sent 365 surveys were completed for a 23% response rate. Practicing women urologists were most likely to be in academic practice (85 of 218 or 39%) or group practice (96 of 218 or 44%). Of 215 women urologists 108 (almost 45%) held a traditional academic rank of professor, associate professor or assistant professor. Of practicing female urologists 52% had completed fellowship training. In the early 1990s a traditional academic rank was held by 22% to 31% of women compared to 44.6% in the current study. Fellowship trained women urologists were more likely to hold a traditional academic rank (p <0.001). Nonfellowship trained women urologists were as likely to work more than 50 hours per week as those who were fellowship trained (p = 1). Compared to practicing urologists current trainees were more likely to have another female urology resident in the program during training as well as a female attending (each p <0.001). There was no difference between trainees and those in practice with respect to being mentored during training (p = 0.6). Most trainees and practicing urologists reported being a mentor to younger women in urology (p = 0.5).
Women urologists have a high rate of fellowship training and more women are attaining academic rank and pursuing academics. Mentoring in urological training is improving. However, there is a continued need for women urologists to ascend to leadership positions in training programs and urological societies to more accurately reflect the changing membership of urologists as a group.
我们研究了女性泌尿外科医生的导师指导情况及职业选择趋势。
2015年1月,我们向1563名女性泌尿外科医生发放了一份匿名电子调查问卷。描述性数据以百分比和均值呈现。
在发出的1563封电子邮件中,有365份调查问卷被完成,回复率为23%。执业女性泌尿外科医生最有可能从事学术工作(218人中的85人,占39%)或团体执业(218人中的96人,占44%)。在215名女性泌尿外科医生中,108人(近45%)拥有教授、副教授或助理教授的传统学术职称。在执业女性泌尿外科医生中,52%完成了专科培训。在20世纪90年代初,22%至31%的女性拥有传统学术职称,而在本研究中这一比例为44.6%。接受过专科培训的女性泌尿外科医生更有可能拥有传统学术职称(p<0.001)。未接受专科培训的女性泌尿外科医生每周工作超过50小时的可能性与接受过专科培训的医生相同(p = 1)。与执业泌尿外科医生相比,当前的受训人员在培训期间更有可能在项目中有另一位女性泌尿外科住院医生以及一位女性主治医生(p均<0.001)。在培训期间接受指导方面,受训人员与执业医生之间没有差异(p = 0.6)。大多数受训人员和执业泌尿外科医生报告称自己是泌尿外科年轻女性的导师(p = 0.5)。
女性泌尿外科医生专科培训率较高,越来越多的女性获得学术职称并从事学术工作。泌尿外科培训中的指导情况正在改善。然而,女性泌尿外科医生仍需要继续在培训项目和泌尿外科协会中担任领导职务,以更准确地反映泌尿外科医生群体不断变化的构成情况。