• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及儿童的自行车事故中头盔使用情况的社会差异。

Social Disparities in Helmet Usage in Bicycle Accidents Involving Children.

作者信息

Sweatt Imani H, Barr Candace, Gelinne Aaron, Woolard Alice, Quinsey Carolyn

机构信息

General Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

General Surgery, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 17;15(7):e42017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42017. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.42017
PMID:37593306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10430888/
Abstract

Background Bicycle helmet use has a known protective health benefit; yet, pediatric populations have suboptimal helmet rates, which increases the risk of severe injuries. It is imperative to have an updated assessment of behavioral social disparities and for providers to be aware of them to better counsel patients. The study objective was to identify social determinants correlated with helmet use in children involved in bicycle accidents. Based on previous literature, we hypothesized that higher socioeconomic status, female sex, and Caucasian race were associated with increased helmet use. Methods A retrospective case series of 140 pediatric cases of bicycle-related traumas assessing helmet status. Participants presented to the emergency room with injuries due to a bicycle-related trauma and were subsequently admitted to the University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital System in Chapel Hill, North Carolina (NC), from June 2006 to May 2020. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study comprised a retrospective chart review of 140 cases from the pediatric (<18 years of age) trauma database with coding indicating bicycle-related injury. Zip codes were used to approximate the median household income utilizing the Proximity One government database. The primary exposure was helmet status, which was determined from the electronic record chart review. The hypothesis was formulated before the start of the study. The main outcomes measured in the study included age, sex, race, helmet status, zip code, insurance status, injury types, and mortality. Results There were a total of 140 study participants, of which 35 were female and 105 were male. Males comprised 79.6% of the non-helmeted group, while females were in the minority in both helmet status groups, with 65.7% still being non-helmeted. Additionally, 51.9% of patients who were helmeted used private insurance, and 59.3% of those non-helmeted used public insurance. Of the 71 head injuries, 88.7% were non-helmeted. Principally, this study found that 80.7% of children involved in a bicycle-related accident were not helmeted.  Conclusions Despite NC legislation mandating that children under 16 years of age wear helmets while operating bicycles, many children injured in bicycle-related trauma are not complying with this requirement. This study demonstrates that specific populations have decreased rates of helmet usage and emphasize the continued need to monitor helmet behaviors.

摘要

背景

已知使用自行车头盔对健康有益;然而,儿童群体的头盔佩戴率不理想,这增加了严重受伤的风险。必须对行为社会差异进行最新评估,以便医疗服务提供者了解这些差异,从而更好地为患者提供咨询。本研究的目的是确定与涉及自行车事故的儿童头盔使用情况相关的社会决定因素。基于以往的文献,我们假设较高的社会经济地位、女性性别和白种人与头盔使用增加有关。

方法

对140例儿童自行车相关创伤病例进行回顾性病例系列研究,评估头盔使用情况。参与者因自行车相关创伤受伤后前往急诊室,并于2006年6月至2020年5月期间被收治入北卡罗来纳州教堂山的北卡罗来纳大学(UNC)医院系统。机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的研究包括对140例来自儿科(<18岁)创伤数据库的病例进行回顾性病历审查,编码显示与自行车相关的损伤。利用Proximity One政府数据库,通过邮政编码来估算家庭收入中位数。主要暴露因素是头盔使用情况,通过电子病历审查确定。该假设在研究开始前就已形成。本研究测量的主要结果包括年龄、性别、种族、头盔使用情况、邮政编码、保险状况、损伤类型和死亡率。

结果

共有140名研究参与者,其中35名是女性,105名是男性。男性占未佩戴头盔组的79.6%,而在两个头盔使用情况组中女性均占少数,仍有65.7%未佩戴头盔。此外,佩戴头盔的患者中有51.9%使用私人保险,未佩戴头盔的患者中有59.3%使用公共保险。在71例头部受伤病例中,88.7%未佩戴头盔。主要地,本研究发现80.7%涉及自行车相关事故的儿童未佩戴头盔。

结论

尽管北卡罗来纳州有立法规定16岁以下儿童骑自行车时必须佩戴头盔,但许多在自行车相关创伤中受伤的儿童并未遵守这一要求。本研究表明特定人群的头盔使用率较低,并强调持续监测头盔使用行为的必要性。

相似文献

1
Social Disparities in Helmet Usage in Bicycle Accidents Involving Children.涉及儿童的自行车事故中头盔使用情况的社会差异。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 17;15(7):e42017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42017. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Race and Insurance Status as Predictors of Bicycle Trauma Outcome in Adults.种族和保险状况是成人自行车创伤结果的预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the use of helmets in children involved in bicycle accidents.涉及自行车事故的儿童在头盔使用方面的种族/族裔和社会经济差异。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jun;49(6):1000-3; discussion 1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
4
The Association of Payer Status and Injury Patterns in Pediatric Bicycle Injuries.儿童自行车损伤中支付者状态与损伤模式的关联
J Surg Res. 2020 Oct;254:398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Impact of bicycle helmet safety legislation on children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center.自行车头盔安全立法对一家地区性儿科创伤中心收治儿童的影响。
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Feb;33(2):317-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90454-7.
6
Bike helmets prevent pediatric head injury in serious bicycle crashes with motor vehicles.自行车头盔可预防儿童在与机动车发生的严重自行车碰撞事故中头部受伤。
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 12;7(Suppl 1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00249-y.
7
Influence of socioeconomic status on the effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation for children: a prospective observational study.社会经济地位对儿童自行车头盔立法有效性的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):e192-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.e192.
8
Pediatric bicycle injury prevention and the effect of helmet use: the West Virginia experience.小儿自行车伤害预防及头盔使用的效果:西弗吉尼亚州的经验
W V Med J. 2012 May-Jun;108(3):78-81.
9
Association Between Conventional Bicycle Helmet Use and Facial Injuries After Bicycle Crashes.常规自行车头盔使用与自行车碰撞后面部受伤的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb 1;145(2):140-145. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3351.
10
The effect of bicycle helmet legislation on pediatric injury.自行车头盔立法对儿童伤害的影响。
J Trauma Nurs. 2007 Apr-Jun;14(2):84-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JTN.0000278793.28536.1c.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Helmet-Wearing Policy on E-Bike Safety Riding Behavior: A Bivariate Ordered Probit Analysis in Ningbo, China.戴头盔政策对电动自行车安全骑行行为的影响:基于中国宁波的二元有序 Probit 分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;19(5):2830. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052830.
2
Helmet use and bicycle-related trauma injury outcomes.头盔使用与自行车相关创伤损伤结果。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(13-14):1597-1601. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1650201. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Gender differences in cyclists' crashes: an analysis of routinely recorded crash data.
性别差异在自行车事故中的作用:基于常规记录的事故数据的分析。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2019 Dec;26(4):391-398. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1653930. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
Free-Floating Bikeshare and Helmet Use in Seattle, WA.西雅图的共享单车自由骑行与头盔使用情况。
J Community Health. 2019 Jun;44(3):577-579. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-00599-1.
5
Bicycle-related injuries among children treated in US emergency departments, 2006-2015.2006-2015 年美国急诊部门治疗的儿童与自行车相关的伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 26.
6
Bicycle helmet use among persons 5years and older in the United States, 2012.2012年美国5岁及以上人群使用自行车头盔的情况。
J Safety Res. 2016 Dec;59:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Bicycle helmet laws and persistent racial and ethnic helmet use disparities among urban high school students: a repeated cross-sectional analysis.自行车头盔法规与城市高中生中持续存在的种族和族裔头盔使用差异:一项重复横断面分析。
Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0086-3. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
A social-ecologic framework for improving bicycle helmet use by children.一个用于提高儿童自行车头盔使用率的社会生态框架。
WMJ. 2014 Apr;113(2):49-51.
9
Economic disparity in bicycle helmet use by children six years after the introduction of legislation.立法实施六年之后儿童使用自行车头盔情况中的经济差异。
Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):231-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011379.
10
Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review.自行车头盔立法提高头盔使用率的有效性:一项系统评价
Inj Prev. 2006 Apr;12(2):76-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010942.