González-Ferrero Teba, Bergonti Marco, López-Canoa José Nicolás, Arias Federico García-Rodeja, Eiras Penas Sonia, Spera Francesco, González-Maestro Adrián, Minguito-Carazo Carlos, Martínez-Sande José Luis, González-Melchor Laila, García-Seara Francisco Javier, Fernández-López Jesús Alberto, Álvarez-Castro Ezequiel, González-Juanatey José Ramón, Heidbuchel Hein, Sarkozy Andrea, Rodríguez-Mañero Moisés
Cardiovascular Area and Coronary Unit, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Translational Cardiology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Travesía da Choupana s/n, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, A Coruña, Spain.
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;10(5):3055-3066. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14448. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
This study aims to investigate the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred for ablation who develop arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM) as well as their long-term outcomes after catheter ablation (CA).
A prospective multicentre study was conducted on consecutive AF patients who underwent CA. AiCM was defined as the development of heart failure in the presence of AF and an improvement of left ventricular fraction by at least 10% at 6 months after ablation. A subgroup of patients underwent peripheral and left atrial blood samples [galectin-3, fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4), and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE)] at the time of the procedure. Of the 769 patients who underwent AF ablation, 135 (17.56%) met the criteria for AiCM. Independent predictors of AiCM included persistent AF, male gender, left atrial volume, QRS width, active smoking, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Biomarker analysis revealed that sRAGE, FABP4, and galectin-3 levels were not predictive of AiCM development nor did they differ between groups or predict recurrence. There were no differences in AF recurrence between patients with and without AiCM (30.83% vs. 27.77%; P = 0.392) during a median follow-up of 23.83 months (inter-quartile range 9-36).
In the subset of patients referred for AF ablation, the development of AiCM was associated with persistent AF and CKD. Biomarker analysis was not different between groups nor predicted recurrence. Patients with AiCM benefited from ablation, with a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and similar AF recurrence rates to those without AiCM.
本研究旨在调查因房颤(AF)接受消融治疗且发生心律失常性心肌病(AiCM)的患者的临床和生化特征,以及他们在导管消融(CA)后的长期预后。
对连续接受CA的房颤患者进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究。AiCM定义为在存在房颤的情况下发生心力衰竭,且在消融后6个月时左心室射血分数至少提高10%。一组患者在手术时采集外周血和左心房血样本[半乳糖凝集素-3、脂肪酸结合蛋白4(FABP4)和晚期糖基化终产物可溶性受体(sRAGE)]。在769例接受房颤消融的患者中,135例(17.56%)符合AiCM标准。AiCM的独立预测因素包括持续性房颤、男性、左心房容积、QRS波宽度、主动吸烟和慢性肾脏病(CKD)。生物标志物分析显示,sRAGE、FABP4和半乳糖凝集素-3水平不能预测AiCM的发生,两组之间也无差异,也不能预测复发。在中位随访23.83个月(四分位间距9-36)期间,有和没有AiCM的患者房颤复发率无差异(30.83%对27.77%;P =