• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否搭桥:可卡因使用障碍中的道德判断,一项关于人类道德的病例对照研究。

To bridge or not to bridge: Moral Judgement in Cocaine Use Disorders, a case-control study on human morality.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.

Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse & Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life, and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2023 Dec;18(5):271-281. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2023.2242096. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1080/17470919.2023.2242096
PMID:37594151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the "Dual-Process theory", morality is characterized by the interaction between an automatic-emotional process, mediated by the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) and linked to personal-deontological decisions, and a rational-conscious one, mediated by the Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) and linked to impersonal-utilitarian decisions. These areas are altered by chronic use of cocaine, with a possible impact on moral decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference between a group of Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD) patients and a control group in moral decision-making.

METHODS

Subjects with CUD were compared to an equal-sized healthy group regarding their moral decision-making. Trolley and Footbridge Moral Dilemmas were administered to each group. The quality of the answer (yes or no) and the time needed to answer were recorded.

RESULTS

The recruited group includes 72 subjects, 36 with CUD and 36 healthy subjects (average age of 39.51 ± 9.89). In the Trolley dilemma, almost all the subjects (97.3%) answered "yes", while in the Footbridge dilemma CUD subjects answered "yes" more often (52.7%) than the healthy group (19.4%).

CONCLUSION

For strong emotional dilemmas (Footbridge), cocaine users answered "yes" with a higher frequency compared to healthy subjects, highlighting a wider utilitarian tendency in decision-making and a poor emotional participation.

摘要

背景

在“双过程理论”中,道德的特点是自动情感过程与前扣带皮层(ACC)的相互作用,并与个人义务决策相关,以及理性意识过程与背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的相互作用,并与非个人功利决策相关。这些区域会因慢性使用可卡因而发生改变,可能会对道德决策产生影响。

目的

评估一组可卡因使用障碍(CUD)患者与对照组在道德决策方面的差异。

方法

将 CUD 患者与具有相同数量的健康组进行道德决策比较。向每组受试者施用电车和天桥道德困境。记录答案的质量(是或否)和回答所需的时间。

结果

所招募的组包括 72 名受试者,36 名患有 CUD 和 36 名健康受试者(平均年龄为 39.51±9.89)。在电车困境中,几乎所有受试者(97.3%)都回答“是”,而在天桥困境中,CUD 受试者回答“是”的频率(52.7%)高于健康组(19.4%)。

结论

对于强烈的情感困境(天桥),与健康受试者相比,可卡因使用者更频繁地回答“是”,这突出了决策中的功利倾向更大,情感参与度较差。

相似文献

1
To bridge or not to bridge: Moral Judgement in Cocaine Use Disorders, a case-control study on human morality.是否搭桥:可卡因使用障碍中的道德判断,一项关于人类道德的病例对照研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2023 Dec;18(5):271-281. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2023.2242096. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Machines and humans in sacrificial moral dilemmas: Required similarly but judged differently?机器和人类在牺牲道德困境中的角色:需要相似但评判不同?
Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105575. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105575. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Functional alteration in frontolimbic systems relevant to moral judgment in cocaine-dependent subjects.与可卡因依赖者道德判断相关的额前叶边缘系统的功能改变。
Addict Biol. 2014 Mar;19(2):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00472.x. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
4
Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational.评判功利主义行为的道德性:功利主义可及性的匮乏如何使法官变得不理性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1961-1967. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1029-2.
5
Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.被手推车带偏:为什么牺牲性道德困境对功利主义判断的揭示甚少(或毫无揭示)。
Soc Neurosci. 2015;10(5):551-60. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1023400. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
Stress alters personal moral decision making.压力会改变个人的道德决策。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Apr;37(4):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
7
Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?情感发作是否会调节双相情感障碍个体的道德判断?
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.067. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents.道德判断中的性别差异以及对特定性别的道德主体的评价。
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):399-405. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0822-9. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.海马体损伤会增加道德决策过程中的道义论反应。
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;36(48):12157-12167. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0707-16.2016.
10
Moral decision-making in polysubstance dependent individuals.多药物依赖个体的道德决策。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Dec 1;126(3):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.038. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol vs. Cocaine: Impulsivity and Alexithymia in Substance Use Disorder.酒精与可卡因:物质使用障碍中的冲动性与述情障碍
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 22;15(6):711. doi: 10.3390/bs15060711.
2
Examining Lurasidone Efficacy in Patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Illness and Concurrent Alcohol and Substance Use Disorder: A Prospective, Multicentric, Real-World Investigation.考察鲁拉西酮对精神分裂症谱系疾病合并酒精和物质使用障碍患者的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、真实世界研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 11;13(8):2206. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082206.