Suppr超能文献

临床评估在生物标志物时代的作用。

The Role of Clinical Assessment in the Era of Biomarkers.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. S.W., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jul;20(4):1001-1018. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01410-3. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

Abstract

Hippocratic Medicine revolved around the three main principles of patient, disease, and physician and promoted the systematic observation of patients, rational reasoning, and interpretation of collected information. Although these remain the cardinal features of clinical assessment today, Medicine has evolved from a more physician-centered to a more patient-centered approach. Clinical assessment allows physicians to encounter, observe, evaluate, and connect with patients. This establishes the patient-physician relationship and facilitates a better understanding of the patient-disease relationship, as the ultimate goal is to diagnose, prognosticate, and treat. Biomarkers are at the core of the more disease-centered approach that is currently revolutionizing Medicine as they provide insight into the underlying disease pathomechanisms and biological changes. Genetic, biochemical, radiographic, and clinical biomarkers are currently used. Here, we define a seven-level theoretical construct for the utility of biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases. Level 1-3 biomarkers are considered supportive of clinical assessment, capable of detecting susceptibility or risk factors, non-specific neurodegeneration or dysfunction, and/or changes at the individual level which help increase clinical diagnostic accuracy and confidence. Level 4-7 biomarkers have the potential to surpass the utility of clinical assessment through detection of early disease stages and prediction of underlying pathology. In neurodegenerative diseases, biomarkers can potentiate, but cannot substitute, clinical assessment. In this current era, aside from adding to the discovery, evaluation/validation, and implementation of more biomarkers, clinical assessment remains crucial to maintaining the personal, humanistic, and sociocultural aspects of patient care. We would argue that clinical assessment is a custom that should never go obsolete.

摘要

希波克拉底医学围绕着患者、疾病和医生这三个主要原则,提倡对患者进行系统观察、进行理性推理并对收集到的信息进行解释。尽管这些仍然是今天临床评估的主要特征,但医学已经从更以医生为中心的方法发展为更以患者为中心的方法。临床评估使医生能够接触、观察、评估和与患者建立联系。这建立了医患关系,并促进了对患者-疾病关系的更好理解,因为最终目标是诊断、预后和治疗。生物标志物是目前正在改变医学的更以疾病为中心方法的核心,因为它们深入了解潜在的疾病病理机制和生物学变化。目前使用遗传、生化、影像学和临床生物标志物。在这里,我们为神经退行性疾病中的生物标志物的效用定义了一个七级理论结构。第 1-3 级生物标志物被认为对临床评估有支持作用,能够检测易感性或风险因素、非特异性神经退行性变或功能障碍,以及/或个体水平的变化,有助于提高临床诊断的准确性和信心。第 4-7 级生物标志物有可能通过检测早期疾病阶段和预测潜在病理来超越临床评估的效用。在神经退行性疾病中,生物标志物可以增强,但不能替代临床评估。在当前这个时代,除了增加对更多生物标志物的发现、评估/验证和实施之外,临床评估仍然是维持患者护理的个性化、人性化和社会文化方面的关键。我们认为临床评估是一种不应过时的习惯。

相似文献

1
The Role of Clinical Assessment in the Era of Biomarkers.临床评估在生物标志物时代的作用。
Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jul;20(4):1001-1018. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01410-3. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
DISEASE to EASE: Paradigm shift in clinical approach.疾病缓解:临床方法的范式转变。
Med Teach. 2020 Jan;42(1):114-115. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1597259. Epub 2019 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

10
Posterior cortical atrophy: Primary occipital variant.后部皮质萎缩:原发性枕叶变异型。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jul;29(7):2138-2143. doi: 10.1111/ene.15327. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验