Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mov Disord. 2022 Jun;37(6):1131-1148. doi: 10.1002/mds.29005. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
BACKGROUND: The second consensus criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) are widely recognized as the reference standard for clinical research, but lack sensitivity to diagnose the disease at early stages. OBJECTIVE: To develop novel Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for MSA diagnosis using an evidence-based and consensus-based methodology. METHODS: We identified shortcomings of the second consensus criteria for MSA diagnosis and conducted a systematic literature review to answer predefined questions on clinical presentation and diagnostic tools relevant for MSA diagnosis. The criteria were developed and later optimized using two Delphi rounds within the MSA Criteria Revision Task Force, a survey for MDS membership, and a virtual Consensus Conference. RESULTS: The criteria for neuropathologically established MSA remain unchanged. For a clinical MSA diagnosis a new category of clinically established MSA is introduced, aiming for maximum specificity with acceptable sensitivity. A category of clinically probable MSA is defined to enhance sensitivity while maintaining specificity. A research category of possible prodromal MSA is designed to capture patients in the earliest stages when symptoms and signs are present, but do not meet the threshold for clinically established or clinically probable MSA. Brain magnetic resonance imaging markers suggestive of MSA are required for the diagnosis of clinically established MSA. The number of research biomarkers that support all clinical diagnostic categories will likely grow. CONCLUSIONS: This set of MDS MSA diagnostic criteria aims at improving the diagnostic accuracy, particularly in early disease stages. It requires validation in a prospective clinical and a clinicopathological study. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
背景:多系统萎缩(MSA)的第二共识诊断标准被广泛认为是临床研究的参考标准,但缺乏对早期疾病的诊断敏感性。
目的:使用基于证据和共识的方法制定新的运动障碍协会(MDS)MSA 诊断标准。
方法:我们确定了 MSA 诊断的第二共识标准的不足之处,并进行了系统的文献回顾,以回答有关 MSA 诊断的临床表现和诊断工具的预设问题。这些标准是在 MSA 标准修订工作组内使用两轮 Delphi 方法、MDS 成员调查以及虚拟共识会议制定和优化的。
结果:经病理证实的 MSA 标准保持不变。对于临床 MSA 诊断,引入了一种新的临床确定 MSA 类别,旨在最大限度地提高特异性,同时保持可接受的敏感性。定义了临床可能 MSA 类别以提高敏感性,同时保持特异性。设计了可能的前驱 MSA 研究类别,以捕获出现症状和体征但不符合临床确定或临床可能 MSA 标准的早期阶段的患者。需要脑磁共振成像标志物来支持临床确定 MSA 的诊断。支持所有临床诊断类别的研究生物标志物的数量可能会增加。
结论:这套 MDS MSA 诊断标准旨在提高诊断准确性,特别是在早期疾病阶段。它需要在前瞻性临床和临床病理研究中进行验证。© 2022 作者。运动障碍协会代表国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会在 Wiley 期刊上发表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-8-13
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025-8-27
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025-8-23