From the Departments of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology (Oostendorp), Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Dicoon BV, Arnhem, the Netherlands (Oostendorp).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024 Feb 1;148(2):e40-e47. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0478-OA.
CONTEXT.—: Total serum bilirubin (TSB) analysis is pivotal for diagnosing neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Because of a routine change in laboratory equipment, our TSB assay changed from a diazo to a vanadate oxidase method. Upon implementation, TSB results were substantially higher in newborns than expected based on the validation.
OBJECTIVE.—: To investigate the application of TSB and intermethod differences in neonates and their impact on phototherapy treatment.
DESIGN.—: The diazo and vanadate methods were compared directly using neonatal and adult samples. Anonymized external quality control data were analyzed to explore interlaboratory differences among 8 commercial TSB assays. Clinical patient data were extracted from the medical records to investigate the number of newborns receiving phototherapy.
RESULTS.—: The mean bias of the vanadate versus the diazo TSB method was +17.4% and +3.7% in neonatal and adult samples, respectively. External quality control data showed that the bias of commercial TSB methods compared with the reference method varied from -3.6% to +20.2%. Within-method variation ranged from 5.2% to 16.0%. After implementation of the vanadate TSB method, the number of neonates treated with phototherapy increased approximately threefold.
CONCLUSIONS.—: Currently available TSB assays lack harmonization for the diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Between-methods differences are substantially higher in neonatal compared with adult samples, highlighting the importance of including neonatal samples during assay validation. Close collaboration between laboratory specialists and clinicians is essential to prevent overtreatment or undertreatment upon the implementation of novel analyzers or assays. Also, harmonization of TSB assays, with an emphasis on neonatal application, is warranted.
总血清胆红素(TSB)分析对于诊断新生儿高胆红素血症至关重要。由于实验室设备的常规变更,我们的 TSB 分析方法从重氮法变为了钒酸盐氧化酶法。实施后,新生儿的 TSB 结果比根据验证预期的结果高很多。
研究 TSB 在新生儿中的应用以及不同方法之间的差异及其对光疗治疗的影响。
直接比较重氮法和钒酸盐法在新生儿和成人样本中的应用。分析匿名外部质量控制数据,以探索 8 种商业 TSB 分析之间的实验室间差异。从病历中提取临床患者数据,以调查接受光疗的新生儿数量。
钒酸盐与重氮 TSB 方法的平均偏差分别为新生儿和成人样本的+17.4%和+3.7%。外部质量控制数据显示,与参考方法相比,商业 TSB 方法的偏差范围从-3.6%到+20.2%。内部分歧范围从 5.2%到 16.0%。实施钒酸盐 TSB 方法后,接受光疗治疗的新生儿数量增加了大约三倍。
目前可用的 TSB 分析方法在诊断新生儿高胆红素血症方面缺乏协调。与成人样本相比,新生儿样本之间的方法差异要大得多,这突出了在分析验证中包括新生儿样本的重要性。实验室专家和临床医生之间的密切合作对于在新型分析仪或分析方法实施时防止过度治疗或治疗不足至关重要。此外,有必要协调 TSB 分析方法,重点是新生儿应用。