Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Dec;38(12):1731-1741. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4895. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
The American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee charged an ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to review the evidence on whether current approaches for differentiating fracture risk based on race and ethnicity are necessary and valid. To help address these charges, we performed a systematic literature review investigating performance of calculators for predicting incident fractures within and across race and ethnicity groups in middle-aged and older US adults. We included English-language, controlled or prospective cohort studies that enrolled US adults aged >40 years and reported tool performance predicting incident fractures within individual race and ethnicity groups for up to 10 years. From 4838 identified references, six reports met eligibility criteria, all in women. Just three, all from one study, included results in non-white individuals. In these three reports, non-white women experienced relatively few major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), especially hip fractures, and risk thresholds for predicting fractures in non-white women were derived from risks in the overall, predominantly white study population. One report suggested the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) overestimated hip fracture similarly across race and ethnicity groups (black, Hispanic, American Indian, Asian, white) but overestimated MOF more in non-white than White women. However, these three reports were inconclusive regarding whether discrimination of FRAX or the Garvan calculator without BMD or of FRAX with BMD for MOF or hip fracture differed between white versus black women. This uncertainty was at least partly due to imprecise hip fracture estimates in black women. No reports examined whether ratios of observed to predicted hip fracture risks within each race or ethnicity group varied across levels of predicted hip fracture risk. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
美国骨骼与矿物质研究学会(ASBMR)专业实践委员会责成 ASBMR 骨折风险临床算法工作组审查现有基于种族和民族区分骨折风险的方法是否必要和有效的证据。为了帮助解决这些问题,我们进行了一项系统文献综述,研究了预测美国中年及以上成年人骨折风险的计算器在不同种族和族裔群体中的表现。我们纳入了以英语发表的、基于对照或前瞻性队列的研究,这些研究纳入了年龄大于 40 岁的美国成年人,并报告了在个体种族和族裔群体中预测 10 年内骨折风险的工具表现。在 4838 篇已识别的参考文献中,有 6 篇报告符合入选标准,均为女性研究。仅有 3 篇,均来自一项研究,纳入了非白人群体的结果。在这 3 篇报告中,非白人群体发生的主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF),尤其是髋部骨折较少,预测非白人群体骨折风险的阈值来源于白人为主的研究人群的总体风险。一项报告表明,不包括骨密度(BMD)的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)在不同种族和族裔群体(黑种人、西班牙裔、美洲原住民、亚裔、白种人)中对髋部骨折的高估程度相似,但对非白人群体的 MOF 高估程度大于白人群体。然而,这 3 篇报告并未明确表明 FRAX 或不包括 BMD 的 Garvan 计算器或包括 BMD 的 FRAX 对 MOF 或髋部骨折的区分度在白种人和黑种女性之间是否存在差异。这种不确定性至少部分归因于黑种女性髋部骨折的估计不精确。没有报告研究在每个种族或族裔群体中,观察到的与预测的髋部骨折风险之比是否随预测的髋部骨折风险水平的变化而变化。© 2023 作者。《骨质与矿物研究杂志》由 Wiley 期刊出版公司代表美国骨骼与矿物质研究学会(ASBMR)出版。本文作者由美国政府雇员组成,其作品在美国属于公有领域。