Stevens Rebeccah, Schiffman Blakeley, Justicia-Linde Faye, Shelton James
University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023 Sep;37:100897. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100897. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
The purpose of this study was to compare rates of postpartum contraception use in immigrant populations in Buffalo, NY compared with non-immigrant populations. The study also explores rates of specific birth control selection amongst those who did choose to employ postpartum contraception.
A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing the rate of postpartum contraceptive use in 132 immigrant individuals with that of 134 non-immigrant individuals, as measured by the documented intent or refusal to initiate any contraceptive method within the first three months postpartum. Patients were from clinics affiliated with the Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo (WCHOB) who delivered during the years 2015-2016. The immigrant patients were chosen from the top ten immigrant countries of origin who delivered at WCHOB at the time.
After controlling for factors of maternal age, gestational age at time of delivery, and gravidity and parity, the immigrant group was more likely to decline postpartum contraception in the first three months postpartum compared with the non-immigrant group (25.8% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001). Immigrants were more likely to select a barrier method (p = 0.036) and decided to employ contraception more remotely from delivery when compared with non-immigrant individuals (p < 0.001). Amongst the immigrant cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in methods chosen based on broad geographic areas of origin.
Immigrant obstetric populations in Buffalo are less likely to employ postpartum contraception compared with non-immigrant populations. The factors influencing this are multifactorial; however, this information can inform care for both immigrant and non-immigrant patients.
本研究旨在比较纽约州布法罗市移民人群与非移民人群产后避孕措施的使用比例。该研究还探讨了选择采用产后避孕措施的人群中特定避孕方式的选择比例。
进行了一项回顾性图表审查,比较了132名移民个体与134名非移民个体产后避孕措施的使用比例,通过记录的产后前三个月内开始或拒绝采用任何避孕方法的意向来衡量。患者来自布法罗妇女儿童医院(WCHOB)附属诊所,于2015年至2016年期间分娩。移民患者从当时在WCHOB分娩的前十大移民来源国选取。
在控制了产妇年龄、分娩时的孕周、妊娠次数和产次等因素后,与非移民组相比,移民组在产后前三个月更有可能拒绝产后避孕(25.8%对6.7%,p<0.001)。与非移民个体相比,移民更有可能选择屏障避孕法(p = 0.036),并且决定在离分娩更远的时间采用避孕措施(p<0.001)。在移民队列中,根据广泛的原籍地区选择的避孕方法没有统计学上的显著差异。
与非移民人群相比,布法罗市的移民产科人群采用产后避孕措施的可能性较小。影响这一情况的因素是多方面的;然而,这些信息可为移民和非移民患者的护理提供参考。