Piloting a prenatal care smartphone application and care navigation intervention at a federally qualified health center.

BACKGROUND

Given that smartphones are widely used among reproductive-age people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, a smartphone application may be a useful supplement to routine prenatal care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the implementation of a smartphone app that offers patient education, depression screening, social determinants of health screening, and care coordination as an adjunct to routine prenatal care at a federally qualified health center. We further sought to characterize app engagement and the association of app use with pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

The implementation of the smartphone app was a quality improvement initiative in which the app was made available to all people receiving prenatal care at a designated federally qualified health center between December 2020 and December 2021. Individuals who both initiated prenatal care at this site before 28 weeks of gestation and delivered at our institution during the above-defined period were studied retrospectively after obtaining institutional approval. Summary statistics were used to describe app implementation and information regarding social determinants of health and depression screening. Demographics and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between app enrollees and patients receiving prenatal care at the same site who were not enrolled in the app. Data were analyzed using the 2-sample t test to compare continuous variables and the chi-square test to compare categorical variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 800 patients receiving prenatal care at the federally qualified health center during the identified period were telephonically approached for enrollment in the smartphone app. A total of 613 people (76.6%) were successfully reached, and of those successfully reached, 538 (87.7%) accepted enrollment in the app; 76.6% of app enrollees (n=412) completed at least 1 social determinants of health screen. Of those, 29.1% (n=120) screened positive for at least 1 need. Of those with positive screens, 51.7% (n=62) accepted referral to resources to address the identified need. Furthermore, 81% of app enrollees (n=443) completed at least 1 depression screen. Of those, 13.1% (n=58) screened positive for depression, and 37.9% (n=22) of those with positive screens accepted a referral to behavioral health services. A total of 483 people met the inclusion criteria for retrospective review: 264 were enrolled in the smartphone app and 219 were not. App enrollees were more likely to speak English (79.9% of app group vs 61.6% of the non-app group; P<.0001), identify as Hispanic (52.7% vs 39.7%; P=.02), and be privately insured (24.6% vs 15.5%; P=.005), and less likely to have a social determinants of health-related need (10.0% vs 21.0%; P=.01). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery or maternal and neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of patients receiving care through our federally qualified health center enrolled in and used the smartphone app and its associated care coordination. This could be a useful tool to screen for depression and adverse social determinants of health in underserved communities. Given that individuals of higher-resource backgrounds seem more likely to enroll in smartphone apps, a more targeted approach is needed to help connect patients of lower-resource backgrounds to smartphone apps and the resources that they offer.