Suppr超能文献

反复妊娠丢失患者的超生育力和低生育力:基于生育能力差异的临床特征和病因的对比分析。

Superfertility and subfertility in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: A comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and etiology based on differences in fertile ability.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.

出版信息

J Reprod Immunol. 2023 Sep;159:104129. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.104129. Epub 2023 Aug 6.

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the etiologies of and risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) according to fertile ability, focusing on the differences between superfertile and subfertile patients. This retrospective observational study included 828 women with RPL between July 2017 and February 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on time to pregnancy (TTP): superfertile (SUP) (TTP ≤3 months for all previous pregnancies), subfertile (SUB) (previous TTP ≥12 months and use of assisted reproductive technology [ART]), and Normal (N) (TTP >3 or <12 months without ART). All patients were assessed for uterine anatomy, antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs), thyroid function, and thrombophilia. Of the 828 patients, 22%, 44%, and 34% were assigned to the SUP, SUB, and N groups, respectively. The mean ages were 33.9, 38.2, and 35.9 years in the SUP, SUB, and N groups, respectively, revealing a significant difference (P < 0.001). The anti-CL β2GPI antibody positivity rate was significantly higher in the SUP group (4.6%) than in the N group (0.8%; P = 0.016). The prevalence of APA positivity was lowest in the N group. Overall, the clinical characteristics and etiologies of RPL associated with superfertility and subfertility were strikingly similar, with comparable positivity rates after adjusting for maternal age. Further investigation including chromosomal analysis of products of conception is needed to elucidate the clinical impact of differences in fertility on patients with RPL.

摘要

本研究旨在阐明复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的病因和危险因素,并根据生育能力进行分组,重点关注超生育力和低生育力患者之间的差异。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 2 月期间 828 例 RPL 患者。根据妊娠时间(TTP)将患者分为三组:超生育力组(SUP)(所有既往妊娠 TTP ≤3 个月)、低生育力组(SUB)(既往 TTP ≥12 个月且使用辅助生殖技术[ART])和正常组(N)(TTP >3 或 <12 个月且无 ART)。所有患者均评估子宫解剖结构、抗磷脂抗体(APAs)、甲状腺功能和血栓形成倾向。在 828 例患者中,分别有 22%、44%和 34%的患者被分配到 SUP、SUB 和 N 组。SUP、SUB 和 N 组的平均年龄分别为 33.9 岁、38.2 岁和 35.9 岁,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。SUP 组抗-CL β2GPI 抗体阳性率(4.6%)显著高于 N 组(0.8%;P=0.016)。N 组 APA 阳性率最低。总的来说,与超生育力和低生育力相关的 RPL 的临床特征和病因非常相似,在调整了母亲年龄后,阳性率相当。需要进一步进行包括对妊娠产物的染色体分析在内的研究,以阐明生育能力差异对 RPL 患者的临床影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验