• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双胞胎妊娠、分娩及婴儿不良结局:母体生育状况与婴儿性别组合的影响;马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究

Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

作者信息

Luke Barbara, Gopal Daksha, Cabral Howard, Stern Judy E, Diop Hafsatou

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):330.e1-330.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025
PMID:28455086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether the risk of adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies among subfertile women, conceived with and without in vitro fertilization, differs from those conceived spontaneously.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effects of fertility status on adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies on a population basis.

STUDY DESIGN

All twin live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004 through 2010 were linked to hospital discharge records, vital records, and in vitro fertilization cycles. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile, and by twin pair genders (all, like, unlike). Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles were classified as in vitro fertilization; those with indicators of subfertility but without in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as subfertile; all others were classified as fertile. Risks of 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, uterine bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio, placenta previa, and vasa previa], prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 9 adverse infant outcomes (very low birthweight, low birthweight, small-for-gestation birthweight, large-for-gestation birthweight, very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm, birth defects, neonatal death, and infant death) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The study population included 10,352 women with twin pregnancies (6090 fertile, 724 subfertile, and 3538 in vitro fertilization). Among all twins, the risks for all 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly increased for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, with highest risks for uterine bleeding (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.92 and 2.58, respectively) and placental complications (adjusted relative risk ratios, 2.07 and 1.83, respectively). Among all twins, the risks for those born to subfertile women were significantly increased for very preterm birth and neonatal and infant death (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.36, 1.89, and 1.87, respectively). Risks were significantly increased among in vitro fertilization twins for very preterm birth, preterm birth, and birth defects (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Risks of all maternal and most infant adverse outcomes were increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization twins. Among all twins, the highest risks were for uterine bleeding and placental complications for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, and neonatal and infant death in the subfertile group. These findings provide further evidence supporting single embryo transfer and more cautious use of ovulation induction.

摘要

背景

对于通过体外受精和未通过体外受精受孕的不育妇女,双胎妊娠不良结局的风险是否与自然受孕的妇女不同尚不清楚。

目的

我们试图在人群基础上评估生育状况对双胎妊娠围产期不良结局的影响。

研究设计

2004年至2010年马萨诸塞州常住妇女中所有妊娠≥22周且出生体重≥350克的双胎活产与医院出院记录、生命记录和体外受精周期相关联。妇女按生育状况分为体外受精、不育或可育,按双胎性别(全部、同性、异性)分类。与体外受精周期相关的分娩妇女被分类为体外受精;有不育指标但未接受体外受精治疗的妇女被分类为不育;所有其他妇女被分类为可育。以可育组为参照,采用多变量对数二项回归模型分析6种不良妊娠结局(妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠高血压、子宫出血、胎盘并发症[胎盘早剥、前置胎盘和帆状胎盘]、产前住院和初次剖宫产)和9种不良婴儿结局(极低出生体重、低出生体重、小于胎龄出生体重、大于胎龄出生体重、极早产[<32周]、早产、出生缺陷、新生儿死亡和婴儿死亡)的风险,并报告调整后的相对风险比和95%置信区间。

结果

研究人群包括10352例双胎妊娠妇女(6090例可育、724例不育和3538例体外受精)。在所有双胎中,不育组和体外受精组的所有6种不良妊娠结局风险均显著增加,子宫出血风险最高(调整后的相对风险比分别为1.92和2.58),胎盘并发症风险最高(调整后的相对风险比分别为2.07和1.83)。在所有双胎中,不育妇女所生双胎的极早产、新生儿和婴儿死亡风险显著增加(调整后的相对风险比分别为1.36、1.89和1.87)。体外受精双胎的极早产、早产和出生缺陷风险显著增加(调整后的相对风险比分别为1.28、1.07和1.26)。

结论

不育和体外受精双胎的所有母亲和大多数婴儿不良结局风险均增加。在所有双胎中,不育组和体外受精组子宫出血和胎盘并发症风险最高,不育组新生儿和婴儿死亡风险最高。这些发现为支持单胚胎移植和更谨慎使用促排卵提供了进一步证据。

相似文献

1
Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.双胞胎妊娠、分娩及婴儿不良结局:母体生育状况与婴儿性别组合的影响;马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):330.e1-330.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
2
Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.孕产妇生育状况与妊娠、分娩及婴儿结局:马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):327.e1-327.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
3
Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.按生育力状况和多胎妊娠划分的早产风险和婴儿发病率与死亡率。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jan;36(1):121-138. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1333-z. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
5
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
6
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
7
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.
8
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Nov 2;61(7):1-23.
9
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.
10
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.2014年美国辅助生殖技术监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 10;66(6):1-24. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6606a1.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between cardiometabolic index and infertility in American adults: a population-based study.美国成年人中心血管代谢指数与不孕的关系:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 4;15:1424033. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1424033. eCollection 2024.
2
Update on sex specific risk factors in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中性别特异性风险因素的最新进展。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 6;11:1352675. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1352675. eCollection 2024.
3
Assisted reproductive technology: what are the cardiovascular risks for women?辅助生殖技术:女性面临哪些心血管风险?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;21(10):663-673. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2266355. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Mediation effect of pregnancy-induced hypertension on the association between assisted reproductive technology and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based study.妊娠期高血压对辅助生殖技术与不良新生儿结局关联的中介效应:基于人群的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 25;23(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05694-3.
5
Practical data considerations for the modern epidemiology student.现代流行病学学生的实用数据考量
Glob Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;3. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100066. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
6
The impact of single-step and sequential embryo culture systems on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.一步法和序贯胚胎培养系统对单胎妊娠产科和围产结局的影响:马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1246-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
7
Female Sexual Function in Twin Pregnancy.双胎妊娠女性的性功能。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063546.
8
Obstetric outcomes of young women following in-vitro fertilization: a case-control study.年轻女性体外受精后的产科结局:病例对照研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04502-8.
9
Pregnancy and Reproductive Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Women.女性心血管疾病的妊娠和生殖风险因素。
Circ Res. 2022 Feb 18;130(4):652-672. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319895. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Micronutrients in Multiple Pregnancies-The Knowns and Unknowns: A Systematic Review.多胎妊娠中的微量营养素:已知与未知:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2021 Jan 27;13(2):386. doi: 10.3390/nu13020386.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.孕产妇生育状况与妊娠、分娩及婴儿结局:马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):327.e1-327.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
2
Births: Final Data for 2015.出生情况:2015年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Jan;66(1):1.
3
Folic Acid Supplementation for the Prevention of Neural Tube Defects: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.叶酸补充剂用于预防神经管缺陷:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 10;317(2):183-189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19438.
4
Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies.第169号实践公告:多胎妊娠:双胎、三胎及更高阶多胎妊娠
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):e131-46. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001709.
5
Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status.单胎同胞的围产期结局:孕产妇生育状况变化的影响
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1203-13. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0757-6. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
6
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update.美国辅助生殖技术学会与辅助生殖技术:2016 年更新版。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
7
Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).辅助生殖技术协会诊所结果报告系统(SART CORS)出生结局的验证:来自马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究(MOSART)的基于人群的分析。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):717-722.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.042. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕早期超声利用 lambda 征确定双胎妊娠的绒毛膜性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
9
Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort: Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).不孕症治疗的分娩结局:基于人群队列的分析:马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究(MOSART)
J Reprod Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(3-4):114-27.
10
Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: maternal and perinatal outcomes.医学辅助生殖后与自然受孕后的双卵双胎妊娠:母体及围产期结局
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):371-377.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.042. Epub 2016 Apr 21.