• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统与斜行保留肌纤维内镜下贲门肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项随机对照试验(附视频)

Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).

作者信息

Nabi Zaheer, Chandran Vinci, Basha Jahangeer, Ramchandani Mohan, Inavolu Pradev, Kalpala Rakesh, Goud Rajesh, Jagtap Nitin, Darisetty Santosh, Gupta Rajesh, Tandan Manu, Lakhtakia Sundeep, Kotla Rama, Devarasetty Rangarao, Rao Guduru Venkat, Reddy D Nageshwar

机构信息

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.007
PMID:37598863
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

GERD is common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Selective sparing of oblique fibers may reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis after POEM. In this study, we compared the incidence of GERD between conventional myotomy (CM) versus oblique fiber-sparing (OFS) myotomy in patients with achalasia.

METHODS

Eligible patients with type I and II achalasia who underwent POEM from January 2020 to October 2020 were randomized into 2 groups (CM and OFS myotomy). Exclusion criteria were type III achalasia, sigmoid esophagus, and history of Heller's myotomy. The primary study outcome was incidence of reflux esophagitis (at least grade B) in the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were reflux symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, clinical success, and adverse events.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were randomized into CM (n = 58) and OFS myotomy (n = 57) groups. POEM was technically successful in all patients. Overall, reflux esophagitis was found in 56 patients (48.7%). The incidence of at least grade B esophagitis was similar in both groups (CM vs OFS myotomy: 25.9% vs 31.6%, P = .541). The mean number of reflux episodes (48.2 ± 36.6 vs 48.9 ± 40.3, P = .933), increased esophageal acid exposure >6% (45.5% vs 31.7%, P = .266), and high DeMeester scores (38.6% vs 41.5%, P = .827) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic reflux (GERD questionnaire score >7) or use of proton pump inhibitors at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Sparing of sling fibers has no significant impact on the incidence of significant reflux esophagitis after POEM. Novel strategies need to be explored to prevent reflux after POEM. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04229342.).

摘要

背景与目的

经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后胃食管反流病(GERD)很常见。选择性保留斜行肌纤维可能会降低POEM术后反流性食管炎的发生率。在本研究中,我们比较了贲门失弛缓症患者常规肌切开术(CM)与保留斜行肌纤维(OFS)肌切开术的GERD发生率。

方法

将2020年1月至2020年10月接受POEM的I型和II型贲门失弛缓症合格患者随机分为两组(CM和OFS肌切开术)。排除标准为III型贲门失弛缓症、乙状结肠食管和海勒肌切开术病史。主要研究结局是两组反流性食管炎(至少B级)的发生率。次要结局是反流症状、食管酸暴露、临床成功率和不良事件。

结果

115例患者被随机分为CM组(n = 58)和OFS肌切开术组(n = 57)。所有患者的POEM技术均成功。总体而言,56例患者(48.7%)发现有反流性食管炎。两组至少B级食管炎的发生率相似(CM组与OFS肌切开术组:25.9%对31.6%,P = 0.541)。两组的平均反流发作次数(48.2±36.6对48.9±40.3,P = 0.933)、食管酸暴露增加>6%(45.5%对31.7%,P = 0.266)和高DeMeester评分(38.6%对41.5%,P = 0.827)相似。1年时症状性反流率(GERD问卷评分>7)或质子泵抑制剂的使用情况无差异。

结论

保留吊带肌纤维对POEM术后严重反流性食管炎的发生率无显著影响。需要探索新的策略来预防POEM术后的反流。(临床试验注册号:NCT04229342。)

相似文献

1
Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).传统与斜行保留肌纤维内镜下贲门肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项随机对照试验(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Risk factors and long-term course of gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: A large-scale multicenter cohort study in Japan.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗后胃食管反流病的危险因素及长期病程:日本一项大规模多中心队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2022 Sep;54(9):839-847. doi: 10.1055/a-1753-9801. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
3
Gastric myotomy length affects severity but not rate of post-procedure reflux: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial of double-scope per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.胃切开术长度影响严重程度而非术后反流率:双内镜经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗食管失弛缓症的前瞻性随机对照试验 3 年随访。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2963-2968. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07079-0. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
4
Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.经口内镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症导致食管酸暴露异常的发生率高于腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2284-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6522-4. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Peroral endoscopic myotomy laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial.经口内镜肌切开术、腹腔镜肌切开术和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管失弛缓症:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4875-4889. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875.
6
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后胃食管反流病(GERD)
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3308-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08644-2. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update.经口内镜下肌切开术后胃食管反流的预测、预防和管理:更新。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;30(9):1096-1107. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096.
8
Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes, Recurrent Dysphagia, and Gastroesophageal Reflux After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders.食管动力障碍经口内镜下肌切开术后长期预后、复发性吞咽困难及胃食管反流的预测因素
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1352-1361. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05330-z. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
9
Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: Analysis of clinical, procedural and functional factors, associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophagitis.经口内镜下肌切开术后的胃食管反流病:与胃食管反流病和食管炎相关的临床、手术及功能因素分析
Dig Endosc. 2016 Jan;28(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/den.12511. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
Safety and effectiveness of sling fiber preservation POEM to reduce severe post-procedural erosive esophagitis.吊带纤维保留 POEM 减少严重术后腐蚀性食管炎的安全性和有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4255-4264. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08763-w. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: The dilemma and the options.经口内镜下肌切开术后反流:困境与应对选择
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 14;31(6):100510. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i6.100510.
2
Esophageal Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM): Future Directions and Perspectives.经口内镜下食管肌切开术(E-POEM):未来方向与展望。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024 Oct;26(10):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s11894-024-00938-4. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update.
经口内镜下肌切开术后胃食管反流的预测、预防和管理:更新。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;30(9):1096-1107. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096.