Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Pathology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Aug 21;38(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03857-4.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Shock Wave Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming (SWEEPS) in the removal of remaining pulp tissue from the root canal isthmus area in lower molars and compare it with ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and conventional needle irrigation (NI). Forty-one lower molars with isthmuses between mesial canals were included in the study. The teeth were randomly distributed into experimental groups (n = 12/each) based on the final irrigation protocol (SWEEPS, UAI, or NI) and a control group (C) (n = 5). The traditional access cavity of the mesial part of each tooth was made in all samples. The mesial root canals in the experimental groups were instrumented with a Wave One Gold Primary (25/.07) file using 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) while the distal canal served as a control for the presence of pulp tissue. No treatment was performed in the C group. Sections from the isthmus region were processed for histopathology to measure the remaining pulp tissue (RPT). The results were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the relative surface area of root canals and isthmus among the groups (p > 0.05). Samples in the SWEEPS group had significantly less RPT than UAI, NI, and C (p = 0.003, 0.014, 0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences between the UAI and NI (p = 0.583). SWEEPS was the most efficient in debridement of the root canal isthmus area. UAI and NI showed similar but lower efficiency.
本研究旨在评估冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)在去除下颌磨牙根管峡部剩余牙髓组织方面的疗效,并将其与超声激活冲洗(UAI)和常规针式冲洗(NI)进行比较。共有 41 颗具有近中管之间峡部的下颌磨牙纳入本研究。根据最终冲洗方案(SWEEPS、UAI 或 NI)将牙齿随机分为实验组(n = 12/组)和对照组(C)(n = 5)。所有样本的近中部分均制备传统的牙体解剖入口。实验组的近中根管用 Wave One Gold Primary(25/.07)锉用 3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)进行器械预备,而远中根管则作为牙髓组织存在的对照。C 组不进行任何处理。从峡部区域切取组织进行组织病理学处理,以测量剩余牙髓组织(RPT)。采用方差分析和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验(α = 0.05)对结果进行分析。各组之间根管和峡部的相对表面积无显著差异(p > 0.05)。SWEEPS 组的 RPT 明显少于 UAI、NI 和 C 组(p = 0.003、0.014、0.003,分别)。UAI 和 NI 之间无显著差异(p = 0.583)。SWEEPS 是去除根管峡部最有效的方法。UAI 和 NI 的效率相似但较低。