• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The invisible hands in policy making: A qualitative study of the role of advocacy in priority setting for maternal and child health in Nigeria.政策制定中的无形之手:关于倡导在尼日利亚妇幼保健优先事项设定中作用的定性研究
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Jul 10;13(2):147-156. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.18. eCollection 2023.
2
What makes advocacy work? Stakeholders' voices and insights from prioritisation of maternal and child health programme in Nigeria.倡导工作的要素是什么?来自尼日利亚母婴健康项目优先排序的利益相关者的声音和见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 18;20(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05734-0.
3
Exploring mechanisms that explain how coalition groups are formed and how they work to sustain political priority for maternal and child health in Nigeria using the advocacy coalition framework.利用倡导联盟框架探索解释联盟团体如何形成以及它们如何努力维持尼日利亚母婴健康的政治优先事项的机制。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 1;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00660-3.
4
Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process.全球卫生领域的权力与政治:政策制定过程中全球倡导联盟的信仰、竞争与谈判。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jan 30;5(5):309-20. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.03.
5
Generation of national political priority for surgery: a qualitative case study of three low-income and middle-income countries.为外科手术制定国家政策重点:三个中低收入国家的定性案例研究。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60849-2. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
6
Stakeholder perspectives on factors that influence global prioritization for MNH in humanitarian settings.利益相关者对影响人道主义环境下孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康全球优先排序因素的看法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Aug 26;5:1364603. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1364603. eCollection 2024.
7
Why does a public health issue (not) get priority? Agenda setting for the national burns programme in India.为什么一个公共卫生问题(没有)得到优先重视?印度国家烧伤计划的议程设置。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 May 15;39(5):457-468. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae019.
8
Setting the global health agenda: The influence of advocates and ideas on political priority for maternal and newborn survival.设定全球卫生议程:倡导者与理念对孕产妇和新生儿生存政治优先事项的影响
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;166:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
The process of building the priority of neglected tropical diseases: A global policy analysis.构建被忽视热带病优先次序的过程:全球政策分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 12;14(8):e0008498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008498. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Prioritizing Surgical Care on National Health Agendas: A Qualitative Case Study of Papua New Guinea, Uganda, and Sierra Leone.在国家卫生议程中优先安排外科护理:巴布亚新几内亚、乌干达和塞拉利昂的定性案例研究
PLoS Med. 2016 May 17;13(5):e1002023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002023. eCollection 2016 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on factors that influence global prioritization for MNH in humanitarian settings.利益相关者对影响人道主义环境下孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康全球优先排序因素的看法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Aug 26;5:1364603. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1364603. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving maternal and child health policymaking processes in Nigeria: an assessment of policymakers' needs, barriers and facilitators of evidence-informed policymaking.改善尼日利亚母婴健康政策制定过程:对政策制定者基于证据的政策制定的需求、障碍和促进因素的评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 12;15(Suppl 1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0217-5.
2
The influence of power and actor relations on priority setting and resource allocation practices at the hospital level in Kenya: a case study.权力与行为者关系对肯尼亚医院层面的优先事项设定和资源分配实践的影响:一项案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1796-5.
3
Progress in improving provincial plans for nutrition through targeted technical assistance and local advocacy in Vietnam.通过在越南提供有针对性的技术援助和开展地方宣传活动,在改进省级营养计划方面取得的进展。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1333-1341. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw067. Epub 2016 May 19.
4
Discourse, ideas and power in global health policy networks: political attention for maternal and child health in the millennium development goal era.全球卫生政策网络中的话语、理念与权力:千年发展目标时代对母婴健康的政治关注
Global Health. 2016 May 18;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0157-9.
5
Reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities 3rd Edition.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康:《疾病控制优先 3 版》中的重点信息。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2811-2824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00738-8. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
6
Network advocacy and the emergence of global attention to newborn survival.网络宣传与全球对新生儿生存关注度的兴起。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i60-73. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv092. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Agenda setting for maternal survival: the power of global health networks and norms.孕产妇生存的议程设定:全球卫生网络与规范的力量
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i48-59. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu114. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
8
Can frameworks inform knowledge about health policy processes? Reviewing health policy papers on agenda setting and testing them against a specific priority-setting framework.框架能否增进对卫生政策过程的了解?回顾关于议程设定的卫生政策文件,并根据一个特定的优先事项设定框架对其进行检验。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 3:iii6-22. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu081.
9
Public health and media advocacy.公共卫生与媒体宣传。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:293-306. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182503. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Patterns in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: projections of neonatal and under-5 mortality to 2035.孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施覆盖情况的模式:到 2035 年对新生儿和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的预测。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1029-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61748-1.

政策制定中的无形之手:关于倡导在尼日利亚妇幼保健优先事项设定中作用的定性研究

The invisible hands in policy making: A qualitative study of the role of advocacy in priority setting for maternal and child health in Nigeria.

作者信息

Okeke Chinyere, Uzochukwu Benjamin, Shung-King Maylene, Gilson Lucy

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.

Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu Nigeria.

出版信息

Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Jul 10;13(2):147-156. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.18. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.34172/hpp.2023.18
PMID:37600547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10439451/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal and child health is a priority for most governments, especially those in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), due to high mortality rates. The combination of individual and social actions designed to gain political commitment, policy support and social acceptance for health goals are influenced by the interplay between the advocates and the strategies they deploy in planning and advocating for maternal and child health issue. This study aims to deepen our understanding of how advocacy has influenced maternal and child health priority setting in Nigeria.

METHODS

This is a mixed method study that involved 24 key informant interviews, document review, policy tracking and mapping of advocacy events that contributed to the repositioning of maternal and child health on the political agenda was done. Respondents were deliberately selected according to their roles and positions. Analysis was based on Shiffman and Smith's policy analysis framework of agenda setting.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest that use of various strategies for advocacy such as influencers, media, generated different outcomes and the use of a combination of strategies was found to be more effective. The role of advocacy in issue emergence was prominent and the presence of powerful actors, favorable policy window helped achieve desired outcomes. The power of the advocates and the strength of the individuals involved played a key role.

CONCLUSION

This study finds it possible to understand the role of advocacy in policy agenda setting through the application of agenda setting framework. To achieve the health SDG goals, advocacy barriers need to be addressed at multiple levels.

摘要

背景

由于死亡率高,孕产妇和儿童健康是大多数政府的优先事项,特别是中低收入国家(LMICs)的政府。旨在为卫生目标争取政治承诺、政策支持和社会认可的个人行动与社会行动相结合,受到倡导者及其在规划和倡导孕产妇和儿童健康问题时所采用策略之间相互作用的影响。本研究旨在加深我们对倡导如何影响尼日利亚孕产妇和儿童健康优先事项设定的理解。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,涉及24次关键信息访谈、文件审查、政策跟踪以及对有助于将孕产妇和儿童健康重新定位到政治议程上的倡导活动进行映射。根据受访者的角色和职位进行了有针对性的选择。分析基于希夫曼和史密斯的议程设置政策分析框架。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,使用各种倡导策略,如有影响力的人、媒体,会产生不同的结果,并且发现综合使用多种策略更有效。倡导在问题出现方面的作用显著,强大行为体的存在、有利的政策窗口有助于实现预期结果。倡导者的权力和所涉个人的力量起到了关键作用。

结论

本研究发现,通过应用议程设置框架可以理解倡导在政策议程设定中的作用。为实现卫生可持续发展目标,需要在多个层面解决倡导障碍。