Batista Patrícia, Neves-Amado João, Pereira Anabela, Amado João
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Porto, Portuga.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Institute of Health Sciences (ICS), Porto, Portugal.
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Jul 10;13(2):88-98. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.11. eCollection 2023.
Studying lifestyles has always been important; quantifying them has become more complex. However, a questionnaire produced in 1983 has shown that its simple form of evaluation can be an added value in understanding lifestyles. Our aim is a systematic review of the scientific literature about the use of the FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire (FLQ).
The reflective systematic literature review on PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and SCIELO databases with the descriptors "FANTASTIC Lifestyle questionnaire" OR "FANTASTICO questionnaire" OR "FANTASTIC questionnaire" OR "FANTASTIC survey" OR "FANTASTIC checklist". PRISMA criteria reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were applied. The inclusion criteria were the use of FLQ instrument to measure lifestyles, presenting quantitative or qualitative results, and psychometric studies. It excluded other lifestyle instruments, incomplete articles, and non-English, Brazilian, Spanish, and Portuguese language articles.
Findings reveal 41 scientific articles included in the study. It analyzed the results and most studies use the instrument to assess all dimensions. However, some studies reported assessing specific dimensions such as nutrition, sleep, stress, tobacco, alcohol, and drugs. The questionnaire has been applied to a wide range of ages and literacy levels.
This literature review allowed us to conclude that this questionnaire is still in use today and is applied in several contexts and populations. It is also possible to verify the relevance of its use and to design intervention strategies and programs for a healthy society. It is essential to draw attention to this issue and promote health literacy (HL) on this topic.
研究生活方式一直都很重要;对其进行量化变得更加复杂。然而,1983年编制的一份问卷表明,其简单的评估形式在理解生活方式方面可能具有附加价值。我们的目的是对关于使用“FANTASTIC生活方式问卷”(FLQ)的科学文献进行系统综述。
在PubMed、Medline、Science Direct和SCIELO数据库上进行反思性系统文献综述,检索词为“FANTASTIC生活方式问卷”或“FANTASTICO问卷”或“FANTASTIC问卷”或“FANTASTIC调查”或“FANTASTIC清单”。应用系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA标准报告。纳入标准为使用FLQ工具测量生活方式、呈现定量或定性结果以及进行心理测量学研究。排除其他生活方式工具、不完整的文章以及非英语、巴西语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语的文章。
研究结果显示有41篇科学文章被纳入该研究。对结果进行了分析,大多数研究使用该工具评估所有维度。然而,一些研究报告称评估了特定维度,如营养、睡眠、压力、烟草、酒精和药物。该问卷已应用于广泛的年龄和识字水平人群。
这项文献综述使我们得出结论,该问卷如今仍在使用,并应用于多种背景和人群。还可以验证其使用的相关性,并为健康社会设计干预策略和项目。必须关注这个问题,并促进关于该主题的健康素养(HL)。