• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between Symptom Severity and Medication Adherence in Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder Demonstrating Suboptimal Adherence.在表现出药物不依从的双相情感障碍青少年中,症状严重程度与药物依从性的关系。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2023 Aug 11;53(3):8-21.
2
A 6-month, prospective, randomized controlled trial of customized adherence enhancement versus a bipolar-specific educational control in poorly adherent adolescents and young adults living with bipolar disorder.一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性、随机对照试验,旨在比较定制的依从性增强方案与双相情感障碍特定教育对照方案,以改善依从性不佳的青少年和年轻成人双相情感障碍患者的治疗结局。
Bipolar Disord. 2024 Nov;26(7):696-707. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13489. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Association Between Symptom Severity and Medication Adherence in Adults with Bipolar Disorder Reporting Adherence Challenges.成人双相情感障碍患者自述服药依从性挑战与症状严重程度和药物依从性的关系。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):60-72.
4
Symptom severity, self-reported adherence, and electronic pill monitoring in poorly adherent patients with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍依从性差的患者的症状严重程度、自我报告的依从性及电子药丸监测
Bipolar Disord. 2015 Sep;17(6):653-61. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12326.
5
Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medication Plus Customized Adherence Enhancement in Poor Adherence Patients With Bipolar Disorder.长效注射抗精神病药物联合个体化服药依从性增强方案治疗依从性差的双相障碍患者。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2021 Sep 16;23(5):20m02888. doi: 10.4088/PCC.20m02888.
6
A 6-Month, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Customized Adherence Enhancement Versus Bipolar-Specific Educational Control in Poorly Adherent Individuals With Bipolar Disorder.一项为期 6 个月、前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较了针对依从性差的双相情感障碍患者的个体化依从性增强与双相特定教育对照的效果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 25;79(6):17m12036. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m12036.
7
Six-month outcomes of customized adherence enhancement (CAE) therapy in bipolar disorder.双相障碍患者中定制化依从性增强(CAE)疗法的 6 个月疗效。
Bipolar Disord. 2012 May;14(3):291-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01010.x.
8
A customized adherence enhancement program for adolescents and young adults with suboptimal adherence and bipolar disorder: Trial design and methodological report.一项针对依从性不佳的青少年和年轻成人双相障碍患者的定制依从性增强计划:试验设计和方法学报告。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106729. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106729. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
9
Trajectories of medication attitudes and adherence behavior change in non-adherent bipolar patients.未依从的双相情感障碍患者药物态度和依从行为改变的轨迹
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;58:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.023. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
10
Age-Related Differences in Medication Adherence, Symptoms, and Stigma in Poorly Adherent Adults With Bipolar Disorder.年龄相关的药物依从性差异、症状和污名在药物依从性差的双相情感障碍成人中的表现。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2020 Sep;33(5):250-255. doi: 10.1177/0891988719874116. Epub 2019 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronically Monitored Antidepressant Adherence in Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders: A Pilot Study.电子监测焦虑症青少年的抗抑郁药物依从性:一项试点研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr;35(3):145-154. doi: 10.1089/cap.2024.0102. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
A 6-month, prospective, randomized controlled trial of customized adherence enhancement versus a bipolar-specific educational control in poorly adherent adolescents and young adults living with bipolar disorder.一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性、随机对照试验,旨在比较定制的依从性增强方案与双相情感障碍特定教育对照方案,以改善依从性不佳的青少年和年轻成人双相情感障碍患者的治疗结局。
Bipolar Disord. 2024 Nov;26(7):696-707. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13489. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Telehealth Versus Face-to-face Psychotherapy for Less Common Mental Health Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.远程医疗与面对面心理治疗用于治疗罕见心理健康状况:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 11;9(3):e31780. doi: 10.2196/31780.
2
A brief motivational intervention for enhancing medication adherence for adolescents with bipolar disorder: A pilot randomized trial.简短动机干预对提高双相情感障碍青少年用药依从性的效果:一项先导随机试验。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Electronic Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in youth with bipolar disorder: Demographic and clinical predictors of electronic EMA adherence.电子生态瞬时评估(EMA)在双相障碍青少年中的应用:电子 EMA 依从性的人口统计学和临床预测因素。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Sep;116:14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
4
Predicting medication non-adherence in severe affective disorders.预测重度情感障碍患者的药物治疗不依从性。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2000 Sep;12(3):128-30. doi: 10.1017/S0924270800035584.
5
Risk and protective factors associated with substance use disorders in adolescents with first-episode mania.首发躁狂青少年物质使用障碍的相关风险与保护因素
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;53(7):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 May 10.
6
Psychological needs of adolescents in the early phase of bipolar disorder: implications for early intervention.双相障碍早期青少年的心理需求:对早期干预的启示。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011 May;5(2):100-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00273.x.
7
Effects of recurrence on the cognitive performance of patients with bipolar I disorder: implications for relapse prevention and treatment adherence.复发对双相 I 障碍患者认知表现的影响:对复发预防和治疗依从性的启示。
Bipolar Disord. 2010 Aug;12(5):557-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00835.x.
8
Enhancing medication adherence in patients with bipolar disorder.提高双相情感障碍患者的药物依从性。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jan;25(1):1-16. doi: 10.1002/hup.1081.
9
Predictors of nonadherence among individuals with bipolar disorder receiving treatment in a community mental health clinic.在社区心理健康诊所接受治疗的双相情感障碍患者中不依从性的预测因素。
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Mar-Apr;50(2):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
10
Factors associated with prospective long-term treatment adherence among individuals with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者前瞻性长期治疗依从性的相关因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jul;59(7):753-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.7.753.

在表现出药物不依从的双相情感障碍青少年中,症状严重程度与药物依从性的关系。

Association Between Symptom Severity and Medication Adherence in Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder Demonstrating Suboptimal Adherence.

机构信息

Sajatovic, Department of Psychiatry and Neurological & Behavioral Outcomes Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Levin, Department of Psychiatry and Neurological & Behavioral Outcomes Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacol Bull. 2023 Aug 11;53(3):8-21.

PMID:37601085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434309/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While medication non-adherence is common in bipolar disorder (BD), few studies have specifically assessed non-adherent BD adolescents and young adults (AYAs). This analysis, using screening and baseline data from an ongoing randomized controlled trial, examined the relationship between BD symptoms and adherence in poorly adherent AYAs.

METHODS

AYAs ages 13-21 had sub-optimal adherence defined as missing ⩾ 20% of prescribed BD medication. Mean sample (N = 36) age was 19.1 years (SD = 2.0), 66.7 % (N = 24) female, 25.0 % (n = 9) non-white. Adherence was measured via: 1) self-reported Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) and 2) electronic monitoring (SimpleMed pillbox). Symptoms were measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).

RESULTS

Mean percentage of missed BD medications using TRQ was 34.9 (SD = 28.9) at screening and 30.6 (SD = 33.0) at baseline. Mean percentage of missed medication using SimpleMed at baseline was 42.1 (SD = 37.0). The correlation between TRQ and SimpleMed was r = 0.36 (p = 0. 13). Neither CGI nor age were correlated with adherence. Neither TRQ nor SimpleMed were significantly related to HAM-D. YMRS was positively associated with worse adherence for TRQ (r = 0.36, p = 0.03), but not significantly associated with SimpleMed. Adherence did not differ by other demographic attributes.

CONCLUSION

Adherence levels varied widely in AYA with BD. Adherence monitoring increased adherence by approximately 4.5%, and use of electronic pill monitoring identified a greater proportion of missed medication vs. self-report. BD symptoms may not consistently identify AYA with adherence challenges.

摘要

目的

尽管在双相情感障碍(BD)中经常出现药物不依从的情况,但很少有研究专门评估不依从的 BD 青少年和年轻人(AYA)。本分析使用正在进行的随机对照试验的筛查和基线数据,研究了 BD 症状与依从性不良的 AYA 之间的关系。

方法

年龄在 13-21 岁之间的 AYA 被定义为不依从,即错过 ⩾ 20%的规定 BD 药物。平均样本(N=36)年龄为 19.1 岁(SD=2.0),66.7%(N=24)为女性,25.0%(n=9)为非白人。依从性通过以下方式测量:1)自我报告的 Tablets Routine Questionnaire(TRQ)和 2)电子监测(SimpleMed 药盒)。症状采用 Hamilton 抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)、Young 躁狂评定量表(YMRS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)进行测量。

结果

使用 TRQ 在筛查时的平均错过 BD 药物百分比为 34.9%(SD=28.9),在基线时为 30.6%(SD=33.0)。基线时使用 SimpleMed 错过药物的平均百分比为 42.1%(SD=37.0)。TRQ 和 SimpleMed 之间的相关性为 r=0.36(p=0.13)。CGI 和年龄均与依从性无关。TRQ 和 SimpleMed 均与 HAM-D 无显著相关性。YMRS 与 TRQ 的较差依从性呈正相关(r=0.36,p=0.03),但与 SimpleMed 无显著相关性。依从性与其他人口统计学特征无差异。

结论

BD 的 AYA 中,依从水平差异很大。依从性监测使依从性提高了约 4.5%,并且电子药丸监测比自我报告发现更多漏服药物的情况。BD 症状可能无法始终识别出有依从性挑战的 AYA。