Onofre Marcos, Costa João, Martins João, Quitério Ana, Farias Cláudio, Mesquita Isabel
Centro de Estudos de Educação, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa e Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
School of Education, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Aug 4;5:1172815. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1172815. eCollection 2023.
This article presents a discussion of research in Physical Education and Sport Didactics in Portugal. It starts by situating it from an historical perspective, placing the 1980s as the beginning era, mainly based on the studies provided by the two first Physical Education higher education institutes of the country. The initial research, first based on master and doctoral dissertations, progressed to ongoing projects that have been disseminated in international and national journals and books. This development is also reported from the theoretical, conceptual, and methodological perspectives, showing how it has informed the quality of Physical Education and teacher education as the two main research strands to be described, however, acknowledging that a strand on sports coaching and coach education exists. On teaching Physical Education, the article discusses the elements relative to the teacher and to the student, focusing from the immediate and short-term to the distant and long-term events that lead into young adulthood's active lifestyles. In this analysis, research on curriculum and assessment are also reported. On physical education teacher education, the article shows the prevalence of the post-primary Physical Education to argue for the need for more research on primary-level education, and discusses the diverse foci from initial teacher education to in-service education practises. In line with current trends in research, we suggest a set of four features for the future research agenda: (1) addressing short to long-term outcomes of Physical Education; (2) adopting multifactorial and multi-layered perspectives of analysis; (3) embracing inter- and multidisciplinary designs; and (4) taking comparative perspectives within and between European countries, and between Europe and other continents. We conclude that these features need to focus on four levels of integration and cooperation: (a) integration between the research initiatives and the needs of the professional field; (b) integration between research on teaching and learning, teacher education and the curriculum; (c) cooperation between the different national higher education and professional institutions; and (d) integration in the international research agenda by leading and participating in project partnerships which are needed to fully and effectively implement such agenda.
本文探讨了葡萄牙体育与运动教学法的研究情况。文章首先从历史角度对其进行定位,将20世纪80年代作为起始阶段,主要依据该国最早的两所体育高等教育机构所开展的研究。最初的研究主要基于硕士和博士论文,之后发展为在国际和国内期刊及书籍上发表的正在进行的项目。文章还从理论、概念和方法论的角度报道了这一发展情况,展示了它如何影响体育教育和教师教育的质量,这是要描述的两个主要研究方向,不过也承认存在体育教练与教练教育这一研究方向。关于体育教学,文章讨论了与教师和学生相关的要素,重点关注从近期和短期到远期和长期的事件,这些事件会促成年轻人成年后的积极生活方式。在这一分析中,还报道了关于课程和评估的研究。关于体育教师教育,文章指出小学后体育教育的普遍性,以此论证对小学阶段教育进行更多研究的必要性,并讨论了从初始教师教育到在职教育实践的不同关注点。与当前研究趋势一致,我们为未来的研究议程提出了四个特点:(1)关注体育教育的短期到长期成果;(2)采用多因素和多层次的分析视角;(3)采用跨学科和多学科设计;(4)在欧洲国家内部和之间以及欧洲与其他大陆之间采用比较视角。我们得出结论,这些特点需要关注四个层面的整合与合作:(a)研究计划与专业领域需求之间的整合;(b)教学与学习、教师教育和课程研究之间的整合;(c)不同国家高等教育和专业机构之间的合作;(d)通过引领和参与项目伙伴关系融入国际研究议程,而这是全面有效实施该议程所必需的。