Phillips L E, Goodrich K H, Turner R M, Faro S
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Sep;24(3):377-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.3.377-379.1986.
One hundred duplicate endocervical specimens from obstetrical and gynecological patients were cultured for Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Rates of recovery of these organisms from commercially prepared A7 medium and the Mycotrim-GU system were compared. We detected 14 (93%) of the total 15 isolates of Mycoplasma spp. on A7 plates and 11 (73%) in the Mycotrim-GU system. We detected 34 (89%) of the total 38 isolates of U. urealyticum on A7 plates and 32 (84%) in the Mycotrim-GU system. The times of detection for both types of organism were similar in the two systems. We conclude that cultivation on A7 medium as described is a more cost-effective method of recovery of Mycoplasma spp. and U. urealyticum than the Mycotrim-GU system.
对100份来自妇产科患者的宫颈管内膜重复标本进行支原体属和解脲脲原体培养。比较了这些微生物在商业制备的A7培养基和Mycotrim - GU系统中的回收率。我们在A7平板上检测到15株支原体属菌株中的14株(93%),在Mycotrim - GU系统中检测到11株(73%)。我们在A7平板上检测到38株解脲脲原体菌株中的34株(89%),在Mycotrim - GU系统中检测到32株(84%)。两种微生物在两个系统中的检测时间相似。我们得出结论,按照所述方法在A7培养基上培养比Mycotrim - GU系统是一种更具成本效益的回收支原体属和解脲脲原体的方法。