• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工神经网络预测阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿风险

Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Intra-Abdominal Abscess Risk Post-Appendectomy.

作者信息

Alramadhan Morouge M, Al Khatib Hassan S, Murphy James R, Tsao KuoJen, Chang Michael L

机构信息

From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.

Division of General and Thoracic Pediatric Surgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, UTHealth Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Surg Open. 2022 May 23;3(2):e168. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000168. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1097/AS9.0000000000000168
PMID:37601615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10431380/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if artificial neural networks (ANN) could predict the risk of intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) development post-appendectomy.

BACKGROUND

IAA formation occurs in 13.6% to 14.6% of appendicitis cases with "complicated" appendicitis as the most common cause of IAA. There remains inconsistency in describing the severity of appendicitis with variation in treatment with respect to perforated appendicitis.

METHODS

Two "reproducible" ANN with different architectures were developed on demographic, clinical, and surgical information from a retrospective surgical dataset of 1574 patients less than 19 years old classified as either negative (n = 1,328) or positive (n = 246) for IAA post-appendectomy for appendicitis. Of 34 independent variables initially, 12 variables with the highest influence on the outcome selected for the final dataset for ANN model training and testing.

RESULTS

A total of 1574 patients were used for training and test sets (80%/20% split). Model 1 achieved accuracy of 89.84%, sensitivity of 70%, and specificity of 93.61% on the test set. Model 2 achieved accuracy of 84.13%, sensitivity of 81.63%, and specificity of 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

ANN applied to selected variables can accurately predict patients who will have IAA post-appendectomy. Our reproducible and explainable ANNs potentially represent a state-of-the-art method for optimizing post-appendectomy care.

摘要

目的

确定人工神经网络(ANN)能否预测阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿(IAA)形成的风险。

背景

IAA形成发生在13.6%至14.6%的阑尾炎病例中,“复杂性”阑尾炎是IAA最常见的病因。在描述阑尾炎的严重程度以及针对穿孔性阑尾炎的治疗差异方面仍存在不一致。

方法

基于1574例19岁以下患者的回顾性手术数据集的人口统计学、临床和手术信息,开发了两种具有不同架构的“可重现”ANN,这些患者因阑尾炎行阑尾切除术后IAA分为阴性(n = 1328)或阳性(n = 246)。最初的34个独立变量中,选择对结局影响最大的12个变量用于ANN模型训练和测试的最终数据集。

结果

总共1574例患者用于训练集和测试集(80%/20%划分)。模型1在测试集上的准确率为89.84%,灵敏度为70%,特异度为93.61%。模型2的准确率为84.13%,灵敏度为81.63%,特异度为84.6%。

结论

应用于选定变量的ANN能够准确预测阑尾切除术后会发生IAA的患者。我们可重现且可解释的ANN可能代表了一种优化阑尾切除术后护理的先进方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/f4564f7bf690/as9-3-e168-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/25efe4a59b5c/as9-3-e168-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/b30b133d38ab/as9-3-e168-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/3a0e167936ce/as9-3-e168-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/a42a4bf7c32d/as9-3-e168-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/f4564f7bf690/as9-3-e168-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/25efe4a59b5c/as9-3-e168-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/b30b133d38ab/as9-3-e168-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/3a0e167936ce/as9-3-e168-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/a42a4bf7c32d/as9-3-e168-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e2/10431380/f4564f7bf690/as9-3-e168-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Intra-Abdominal Abscess Risk Post-Appendectomy.使用人工神经网络预测阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿风险
Ann Surg Open. 2022 May 23;3(2):e168. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000168. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Lymphocyte depression as a predictor of postoperative intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy in children.淋巴细胞减少作为儿童阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的预测指标
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jan;52(1):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
3
Is abdominal drainage after open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis beneficial or waste of money? A single centre retrospective cohort study.复杂阑尾炎急诊开腹阑尾切除术后腹腔引流是有益还是浪费钱?一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Nov 9;36:168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.10.040. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Antibiotic resistance is common in the cultures of intraabdominal abscess drainage after appendectomy.阑尾切除术后腹腔脓肿引流培养物中普遍存在抗生素耐药性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Sep;57(9):102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Labs Do Not Predict Postoperative Intra-abdominal Abscess in Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis.实验室检查无法预测小儿穿孔性阑尾炎术后腹腔内脓肿的发生。
J Surg Res. 2023 May;285:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.015. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
Pediatric appendectomy: optimal surgical timing and risk assessment.小儿阑尾炎切除术:最佳手术时机与风险评估
Am Surg. 2014 May;80(5):496-9.
7
Laparoscopic Procedure is Not Independently Associated With the Development of Intra-Abdominal Abscess After Appendectomy: A Multicenter Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜手术与阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的发生无独立相关性:一项倾向评分匹配分析的多中心队列研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):409-414. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000460.
8
Risk factors for intra-abdominal abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study on 2076 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎后发生腹腔脓肿的危险因素:一项 2076 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):1175-1180. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00749-y. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
Are Preoperative CT Findings Useful for Predicting Postoperative Intraabdominal Abscess in the Patients with Acute Appendicitis?术前CT检查结果对预测急性阑尾炎患者术后腹腔内脓肿是否有用?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jan 4;55(1):6. doi: 10.3390/medicina55010006.
10
Prophylactic intraabdominal drains do not confer benefit in pediatric perforated appendicitis: Results from a quality improvement initiative.预防性腹腔引流在小儿穿孔性阑尾炎中并无获益:一项质量改进计划的结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Apr;56(4):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Integration of Artificial Intelligence Models in Appendicitis Management: A Comprehensive Review.人工智能模型在阑尾炎管理中的系统整合:全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;15(7):866. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070866.
2
A simple scoring algorithm predicting paravertebral and/or iliopsoas abscess among adults with community-onset bloodstream infections: matters of PVL-producing Staphylococcus aureus.一种预测社区获得性血流感染成人椎旁和/或髂腰肌脓肿的简单评分算法:产PVL金黄色葡萄球菌的问题
Infection. 2025 Feb;53(1):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02344-4. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
3
Construction of a clinical prediction model for complicated appendicitis based on machine learning techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning.可解释机器学习原理与实践
Front Big Data. 2021 Jul 1;4:688969. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.688969. eCollection 2021.
2
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
3
Machine intelligence in healthcare-perspectives on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency.医疗保健中的机器智能——关于可信度、可解释性、可用性和透明度的观点
基于机器学习技术构建复杂阑尾炎的临床预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67453-4.
4
Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review.人工智能在急性阑尾炎诊断和治疗中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):783-792. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01801-x. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 26;3:47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0254-2. eCollection 2020.
4
Prophylactic antibiotic bundle compliance and surgical site infections: an artificial neural network analysis.预防性抗生素束依从性与手术部位感染:人工神经网络分析
Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Dec 7;13:41. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0222-4. eCollection 2019.
5
Artificial neural networks accurately predict intra-abdominal infection in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis.人工神经网络能准确预测中重度和重度急性胰腺炎的腹腔内感染。
J Dig Dis. 2019 Sep;20(9):486-494. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12796. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
6
Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn.揭开聪明汉斯预测者的面具,评估机器真正学到了什么。
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 11;10(1):1096. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08987-4.
7
Applications of artificial neural networks in health care organizational decision-making: A scoping review.人工神经网络在医疗保健组织决策中的应用:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212356. eCollection 2019.
8
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
9
Association of Intraoperative Findings With Outcomes and Resource Use in Children With Complicated Appendicitis.儿童复杂性阑尾炎术中发现与结局及资源利用的相关性研究。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):1021-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2085.
10
An artificial neural network model for the evaluation of carotid artery stenting prognosis using a national-wide database.一种使用全国性数据库评估颈动脉支架置入术预后的人工神经网络模型。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:2566-2569. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037381.