• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较C-TIRADS阳性特征对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断效能。

Comparing Diagnostic Efficacy of C-TIRADS Positive Features on Different Sizes of Thyroid Nodules.

作者信息

Zhou Yue, Li Wei-Min, Fan Xiao-Fang, Huang Yan-Li, Gao Qi

机构信息

Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Department of Special Clinic, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, PLA, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2023 Aug 14;16:3483-3490. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S416403. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S416403
PMID:37601807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438434/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the diagnostic value of positive features in the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) for thyroid nodules of different sizes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1864 patients with 2347 thyroid nodules were selected from January 2021 to December 2022 and assessed according to C-TIRADS. According to the maximum diameter, nodules were divided into the A1 group (≤10 mm), A2 group (>10 mm,<20 mm), and A3 group (≥20 mm). With surgical pathology as the golden standard, the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and each group's area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The diagnostic value of positive features in C-TIRADS for different sizes of thyroid nodules was analyzed.

RESULTS

In all groups, malignant thyroid nodules had a higher incidence of positive features than benign nodules (P < 0.05). In A1 group, the diagnostic efficiency of C-TIRADS positive features for thyroid nodules was vertical orientation> ill-defined/irregular margin or extrathyroidal extension> solid composition> markedly hypoechoic> microcalcifications. The AUCs were 0.718, 0.675, 0.609, 0.558, and 0.581, respectively. In A2 group, the diagnostic efficacy of each positive features for thyroid nodules was ill-defined/irregular margins or extra-thyroid invasion> solid composition> microcalcifications> markedly hypoechoic> vertical orientation. The AUCs were 0.854, 0.730, 0.719, 0.670, and 0.609, respectively. In A3 group, the diagnostic efficacy of each positive features for thyroid nodules was ill-defined/irregular margin or extrathyroidal extension> microcalcifications> solid composition> vertical orientation> markedly hypoechoic. The AUCs were 0.847, 0.778, 0.767, 0.584, and 0.560, respectively.

CONCLUSION

C-TIRADS positive features exhibited different diagnostic efficacy for thyroid nodules of various sizes, especially for thyroid nodules ≤10 mm, for which all positive features had low diagnostic efficacy.

摘要

目的

探讨中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(C-TIRADS)中的阳性特征对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断价值。

患者与方法

选取2021年1月至2022年12月期间共1864例患有2347个甲状腺结节的患者,并根据C-TIRADS进行评估。根据最大直径,结节被分为A1组(≤10mm)、A2组(>10mm,<20mm)和A3组(≥20mm)。以手术病理作为金标准,构建受试者操作特征曲线(ROC),并计算每组的曲线下面积(AUC)。分析C-TIRADS中阳性特征对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断价值。

结果

在所有组中,甲状腺恶性结节的阳性特征发生率高于良性结节(P<0.05)。在A1组中,C-TIRADS阳性特征对甲状腺结节的诊断效能为垂直位>边界不清/不规则或甲状腺外侵犯>实性成分>显著低回声>微钙化。AUC分别为0.718、0.675、0.609、0.558和0.581。在A2组中,各阳性特征对甲状腺结节的诊断效能为边界不清/不规则边缘或甲状腺外侵犯>实性成分>微钙化>显著低回声>垂直位。AUC分别为0.854、0.730、0.719、0.670和0.609。在A3组中,各阳性特征对甲状腺结节的诊断效能为边界不清/不规则边缘或甲状腺外侵犯>微钙化>实性成分>垂直位>显著低回声。AUC分别为0.847、0.778、0.767、0.584和0.560。

结论

C-TIRADS阳性特征对不同大小的甲状腺结节表现出不同的诊断效能,尤其是对于≤10mm的甲状腺结节,所有阳性特征的诊断效能均较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ba/10438434/60fc93c8d45c/IJGM-16-3483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ba/10438434/60fc93c8d45c/IJGM-16-3483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ba/10438434/60fc93c8d45c/IJGM-16-3483-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Diagnostic Efficacy of C-TIRADS Positive Features on Different Sizes of Thyroid Nodules.比较C-TIRADS阳性特征对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断效能。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Aug 14;16:3483-3490. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S416403. eCollection 2023.
2
Alteration Trend and Overlap Analysis of Positive Features in Different-Sized Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: Based on Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.不同大小的良性和恶性甲状腺结节阳性特征的变化趋势及重叠分析:基于中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统
Int J Gen Med. 2024 May 6;17:1887-1895. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S461076. eCollection 2024.
3
Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) for ultrasound features of nodules: multicentric retrospective study in China.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)在结节超声特征中的应用:中国多中心回顾性研究。
Endocrine. 2021 Apr;72(1):157-170. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02442-x. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Markedly hypoechoic: a new definition improves the diagnostic performance of thyroid ultrasound.明显低回声:甲状腺超声的一个新定义提高了诊断性能。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7857-7865. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09828-1. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
[The diagnostic performance of 2020 Chinese Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in thyroid nodules].[2020版中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节中的诊断效能]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 7;101(45):3748-3753. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210401-00799.
6
Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Adjusting the Classification of Chinese-TIRADS 4 Nodules.超声造影在调整中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(Chinese-TIRADS)4类结节分类中的价值
Int J Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 6;2022:5623919. doi: 10.1155/2022/5623919. eCollection 2022.
7
The Value of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Scoring in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.中文甲状腺影像报告和数据系统联合超声造影评分对甲状腺良恶性结节的鉴别诊断价值。
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jul;41(7):1753-1761. doi: 10.1002/jum.15858. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
8
Diagnostic performance of C-TIRADS combined with SWE for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.C-TIRADS 联合超声弹性成像技术对甲状腺结节的诊断性能。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;13:939303. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.939303. eCollection 2022.
9
Diagnostic performance of six ultrasound-based risk stratification systems in thyroid follicular neoplasm: A retrospective multi-center study.六种基于超声的甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤风险分层系统的诊断性能:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 20;12:1013410. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1013410. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparison of diagnostic performance and FNA management of the ACR-TIRADS and Chinese-TIRADS based on surgical histological evidence.基于手术组织学证据的ACR-TIRADS与中国-TIRADS诊断性能及细针穿刺活检管理的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1711-1722. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-685. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Alteration Trend and Overlap Analysis of Positive Features in Different-Sized Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: Based on Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.不同大小的良性和恶性甲状腺结节阳性特征的变化趋势及重叠分析:基于中国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统
Int J Gen Med. 2024 May 6;17:1887-1895. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S461076. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comments on "Effect of the size of benign thyroid degenerative nodules on ACR TI-RADS categories".关于《良性甲状腺退行性结节大小对美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)分类的影响》的评论
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Jul;49(3):503. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01214-6. Epub 2022 May 25.
2
Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.第五版世界卫生组织头颈部肿瘤分类更新:2022 年世界卫生组织头颈部神经内分泌肿瘤分类概述。
Head Neck Pathol. 2022 Mar;16(1):123-142. doi: 10.1007/s12105-022-01435-8. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms.
2022 年世卫组织甲状腺肿瘤分类概述。
Endocr Pathol. 2022 Mar;33(1):27-63. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09707-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
The epidemiological landscape of thyroid cancer worldwide: GLOBOCAN estimates for incidence and mortality rates in 2020.全球甲状腺癌的流行病学概况:2020 年发病率和死亡率的 GLOBOCAN 估计。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Apr;10(4):264-272. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00035-3. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis on Ultrasound.基于卷积神经网络的桥本甲状腺炎超声计算机辅助诊断。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Mar 24;107(4):953-963. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab870.
6
Effect of the size of benign thyroid degenerative nodules on ACR TI-RADS categories.良性甲状腺退行性结节大小对 ACR TI-RADS 分类的影响。
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2022 Jan;49(1):71-76. doi: 10.1007/s10396-021-01163-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Clinically Atypical Subacute Thyroiditis from Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas.超声造影在鉴别临床不典型亚急性甲状腺炎与甲状腺乳头状癌中的价值。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Dec;47(12):3384-3392. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
Molecular Testing for Thyroid Nodules Including Its Interpretation and Use in Clinical Practice.甲状腺结节的分子检测:包括其解读及在临床实践中的应用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8884-8891. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10307-4. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
9
The Value of Relative Size in the Ultrasound Diagnosis of Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm.相对大小在甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤超声诊断中的价值
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jun 3;14:2321-2328. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S313468. eCollection 2021.
10
Three ultrasound phenotypes of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features proposed for imaging-pathology analysis: single center experience.为进行影像病理学分析而提出的具有乳头状核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤的三种超声表型:单中心经验
Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):307-318. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-612.