Suppr超能文献

利用活力PCR检测临床标本中的活沙眼衣原体。

Use of viability PCR for detection of live Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

作者信息

Vojtech Lucia, Paktinat Shahrokh, Luu Tiffany, Teichmann Stella, Soge Olusegun O, Suchland Robert, Barbee Lindley A, Khosropour Christine M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 4;5:1199740. doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1199740. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current testing approach to diagnose (CT) infection relies on nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). These tests are highly sensitive, but do not distinguish between active infection and residual bacterial nucleic acid which may remain after resolution of infection, or via cross-contamination. Better methods to assess the viability of CT detected in clinical samples would be useful in determining the relevance of CT detection in a variety of clinical settings. The goal of this study was to test viability PCR (vPCR) as a method to distinguish viable bacteria from non-viable CT.

METHODS

The vPCR relies on a propidium monoazide dye (PMAxx), which intercalates into accessible DNA from dead organisms and prevents their detection in a PCR assay for the CT gene. We used digital PCR to quantify absolute genome copy numbers from samples. We validated the vPCR approach using laboratory stocks of CT with known viability. Then, we tested total DNA, viable CT DNA, and culture results from 18 clinical vaginal specimens and 25 rectal clinical specimens, all of which had tested positive by NAAT.

RESULTS

In laboratory stocks of CT, vPCR using defined ratios of heat-killed to live bacteria tracked closely with expected results. In vaginal clinical specimens, vPCR and total DNA results were correlated, though total DNA genomes outnumbered viable genomes by 2.2-52.6-fold more copies. As expected, vPCR detected more total genomes than culture results. Both vPCR and total DNA correlated with culture results (Spearman correlation  = 0.8425 for total DNA and 0.8056 for vPCR). Ten rectal NAAT positive specimens were negative by total DNA PCR, vPCR, and were negative or inconclusive by culture. Of the 6 rectal specimens that were culture positive, all were total DNA and vPCR positive. vPCR additionally detected viable bacterial DNA in 8 specimens which were NAAT + and culture negative, though levels were very low (mean 1,357 copies/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

vPCR is a fast and easy method to assess viability in clinical specimens and is more correlated with culture results than total DNA PCR. Inconsistent ratios between total DNA and vPCR results suggest that the amount of dead bacteria varies considerably in clinical specimens. Results from rectal specimens suggest that many NAAT positive specimens do not in fact represent live replicating bacteria, and likely result in significant overuse of unnecessary antibiotics.

摘要

背景

目前用于诊断沙眼衣原体(CT)感染的检测方法依赖于核酸扩增试验(NAATs)。这些试验高度灵敏,但无法区分活跃感染与感染消退后或通过交叉污染可能残留的细菌核酸。在各种临床环境中,评估临床样本中检测到的CT的生存能力的更好方法,对于确定CT检测的相关性将是有用的。本研究的目的是测试生存能力PCR(vPCR)作为一种区分活细菌与无生存能力的CT的方法。

方法

vPCR依赖于单叠氮化丙锭染料(PMAxx),该染料可插入死菌可及的DNA中,并在针对CT基因的PCR检测中阻止其被检测到。我们使用数字PCR来量化样本中的绝对基因组拷贝数。我们使用已知生存能力的CT实验室储备菌株验证了vPCR方法。然后,我们检测了18份临床阴道标本和25份直肠临床标本的总DNA、活CT DNA和培养结果,所有这些标本通过NAAT检测均为阳性。

结果

在CT实验室储备菌株中,使用热杀死细菌与活细菌的特定比例进行的vPCR结果与预期结果密切相关。在阴道临床标本中,vPCR和总DNA结果相关,尽管总DNA基因组的拷贝数比活基因组多2.2至52.6倍。正如预期的那样,vPCR检测到的总基因组比培养结果更多。vPCR和总DNA均与培养结果相关(总DNA的Spearman相关性=0.8425,vPCR的Spearman相关性=0.8056)。10份直肠NAAT阳性标本的总DNA PCR、vPCR结果均为阴性,培养结果为阴性或不确定。在6份培养阳性的直肠标本中,所有标本的总DNA和vPCR均为阳性。vPCR还在8份NAAT阳性且培养阴性的标本中检测到了活细菌DNA,尽管水平非常低(平均1357拷贝/毫升)。

结论

vPCR是一种快速简便的评估临床标本中生存能力的方法,与总DNA PCR相比,它与培养结果的相关性更强。总DNA和vPCR结果之间不一致的比例表明,临床标本中死菌的数量差异很大。直肠标本的结果表明,许多NAAT阳性标本实际上并不代表活的正在复制的细菌,这可能导致不必要抗生素的大量过度使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d241/10436598/4e02cce8b9e7/frph-05-1199740-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验