世界卫生组织的胰腺胆道细胞学分类为内镜超声引导下胰腺细针抽吸的恶性风险和结果分层。

The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Dec;131(12):762-771. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22754. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a classification for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology with differences compared to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) classification.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations from 2014 to 2017 at a pancreatic cancer center. Absolute risk of malignancy (AROM), relative risk (to benign), performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort with comparison of cysts and solid lesions.

RESULTS

In total, 2562 cases were included: 16% cyst (n = 411) and 84% solid (n = 2151). The histologic confirmation rate was 43% (n = 1101) and the median follow-up (for benign) was 56 months. For WHO I-VII, overall AROM (%) was 23, 22, 62, 13, 65, 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 13, 38, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 29, 70, 15, 100, 99, and 100. For PSC I-VI, overall AROM (%) was 23, 29, 64, 0 (IVa), 60 (IVb), 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 0, 21, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 35, 73, 0, 92, 99, and 100. The difference in relative risk for a cyst (vs. solid) overall was 0.38 for WHO and 0.26 for PSC. WHO and PSC categories showed stratification for the probability of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic versus solid lesion type can dramatically affect AROM, particularly for nondiagnostic (I), benign (II), atypical (III), and WHO V categories. WHO IV conveys a similarly low AROM for cystic and solid types. Both classifications stratify the probability of overall survival, including the newly introduced categories WHO IV and WHO V.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)最近发布了一份报告胰腺胆道细胞学的分类,与细胞病理学协会(PSC)的分类存在差异。

方法

回顾性收集了 2014 年至 2017 年在胰腺癌中心进行的胰腺内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术的资料。对整个队列进行了恶性肿瘤绝对风险(AROM)、相对风险(良性)、性能特征和总生存率的计算,并比较了囊肿和实体病变。

结果

共纳入 2562 例:16%为囊肿(n=411),84%为实体(n=2151)。组织学证实率为 43%(n=1101),良性患者的中位随访时间为 56 个月。对于 WHO I-VII 级,整体 AROM(%)分别为 23、22、62、13、65、97 和 100;囊肿 AROM 分别为 7、0、19、13、38、78 和 100;实体 AROM 分别为 50、29、70、15、100、99 和 100。PSC I-VI 级的整体 AROM(%)分别为 23、29、64、0(IVa)、60(IVb)、97 和 100;囊肿 AROM 分别为 7、0、19、0、21、78 和 100;实体 AROM 分别为 50、35、73、0、92、99 和 100。囊肿(与实体)的相对风险差异,WHO 为 0.38,PSC 为 0.26。WHO 和 PSC 类别可分层预测总体生存率。

结论

囊性与实体病变类型对 AROM 影响显著,特别是对非诊断性(I 级)、良性(II 级)、非典型(III 级)和 WHO V 级病变。PSC 囊性和实体类型的 IV 级也具有相似的低 AROM。两种分类均对总体生存率进行了分层,包括新引入的 WHO IV 和 WHO V 类别。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索