• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas.世界卫生组织的胰腺胆道细胞学分类为内镜超声引导下胰腺细针抽吸的恶性风险和结果分层。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Dec;131(12):762-771. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22754. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.在世界卫生组织报告系统中,与胰腺胆道细胞学诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险和总生存。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2024 Oct;132(10):635-645. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22880. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
3
Risk of malignancy associated with diagnostic categories of the proposed World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.与世界卫生组织拟议的胰腺胆管细胞病理学国际报告系统诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Mar;130(3):195-201. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22514. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
The WHO system versus the Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology for risk stratification-which is better?世界卫生组织系统与巴氏细胞学学会系统在报告胰胆细胞学用于危险分层方面的比较——哪个更好?
Diagn Cytopathol. 2024 Mar;52(3):145-155. doi: 10.1002/dc.25258. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system in diagnosing pancreatic lesions: Evaluating diagnostic accuracy.巴氏细胞病理学会(PSC)系统诊断胰腺病变的系统评价与Meta分析:评估诊断准确性
Rev Esp Patol. 2025 Jul-Sep;58(3):100820. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2025.100820. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
6
Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.用于表征胰腺局灶性病变的成像方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2.
7
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration has High Diagnostic Value in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术在实性胰腺病变诊断中具有较高诊断价值。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Sep;31(5):141-145.
8
Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.胰腺胆道内镜超声:证据水平、性能和结果的系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4243-56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4243.
9
An Institutional Experience in Lung Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Comparing Risk of Malignancy With WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology.一项关于肺内支气管超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术的机构经验:将恶性风险与世界卫生组织肺部细胞病理学报告系统进行比较。
Cytopathology. 2025 Sep;36(5):479-483. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13509. Epub 2025 May 14.
10
How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术诊断实性胰腺肿块的正确病因的效果如何?:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):20-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182546e79.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of risk of malignancy and predictive value of diagnostic categories defined by Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system and WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology in solid pancreatic lesions.帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会系统和世界卫生组织报告系统对实性胰腺病变中胰胆细胞病理学所定义的诊断类别之恶性风险及预测价值的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 26;17:17562848241271958. doi: 10.1177/17562848241271958. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic features of low- and high-grade mucinous neoplasms in pancreatic cyst FNA cytology.胰腺囊液细胞学中低级别和高级别黏液性肿瘤的诊断特征。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 May;131(5):325-336. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22681. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
2
The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.世界卫生组织胆胰细胞学报告系统。
Acta Cytol. 2023;67(3):304-320. doi: 10.1159/000527912. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Prospective, Multi-Institutional, Real-Time Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Cyst Fluid Reveals Diverse Genomic Alterations That Improve the Clinical Management of Pancreatic Cysts.前瞻性、多机构、实时下一代测序胰腺囊液揭示了多种基因组改变,改善了胰腺囊肿的临床管理。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Jan;164(1):117-133.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Classification of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic space occupying lesions by Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A five year study.帕帕尼科拉乌细胞病理学协会系统对胰腺占位性病变的内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学分类:一项为期五年的研究。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2023 Feb;51(2):105-116. doi: 10.1002/dc.25058. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas Across Races Demonstrate Disparities with Comparably Good Prognosis.胰腺实性假乳头状瘤在不同种族间存在差异,但具有相似的良好预后。
World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):3072-3080. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06717-4. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Risk of Malignancy Using the Diagnostic Categories Proposed by the World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.采用世界卫生组织国际胰腺胆道细胞学报告系统提出的诊断类别诊断恶性肿瘤的风险。
Acta Cytol. 2022;66(6):475-485. doi: 10.1159/000525276. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
Survival and Incidence Patterns of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Over the Last 2 Decades: A SEER Database Analysis.过去 20 年胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的生存和发病模式:一项 SEER 数据库分析。
Oncologist. 2022 Jul 5;27(7):573-578. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac049.
8
Risk of malignancy associated with diagnostic categories of the proposed World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.与世界卫生组织拟议的胰腺胆管细胞病理学国际报告系统诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Mar;130(3):195-201. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22514. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
EUS-through-the-needle microbiopsy forceps in pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review.用于胰腺囊性病变的超声内镜引导下经针微生物活检钳:一项系统评价
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-24. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_23_20.
10
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytologic Evaluation of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm and Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of Pancreas.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学评估胰腺内导管乳头状黏液性肿瘤和黏液性囊性肿瘤。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):559-570. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa079.

世界卫生组织的胰腺胆道细胞学分类为内镜超声引导下胰腺细针抽吸的恶性风险和结果分层。

The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Dec;131(12):762-771. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22754. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1002/cncy.22754
PMID:37602886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11321709/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a classification for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology with differences compared to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) classification.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations from 2014 to 2017 at a pancreatic cancer center. Absolute risk of malignancy (AROM), relative risk (to benign), performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort with comparison of cysts and solid lesions.

RESULTS

In total, 2562 cases were included: 16% cyst (n = 411) and 84% solid (n = 2151). The histologic confirmation rate was 43% (n = 1101) and the median follow-up (for benign) was 56 months. For WHO I-VII, overall AROM (%) was 23, 22, 62, 13, 65, 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 13, 38, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 29, 70, 15, 100, 99, and 100. For PSC I-VI, overall AROM (%) was 23, 29, 64, 0 (IVa), 60 (IVb), 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 0, 21, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 35, 73, 0, 92, 99, and 100. The difference in relative risk for a cyst (vs. solid) overall was 0.38 for WHO and 0.26 for PSC. WHO and PSC categories showed stratification for the probability of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic versus solid lesion type can dramatically affect AROM, particularly for nondiagnostic (I), benign (II), atypical (III), and WHO V categories. WHO IV conveys a similarly low AROM for cystic and solid types. Both classifications stratify the probability of overall survival, including the newly introduced categories WHO IV and WHO V.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)最近发布了一份报告胰腺胆道细胞学的分类,与细胞病理学协会(PSC)的分类存在差异。

方法

回顾性收集了 2014 年至 2017 年在胰腺癌中心进行的胰腺内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术的资料。对整个队列进行了恶性肿瘤绝对风险(AROM)、相对风险(良性)、性能特征和总生存率的计算,并比较了囊肿和实体病变。

结果

共纳入 2562 例:16%为囊肿(n=411),84%为实体(n=2151)。组织学证实率为 43%(n=1101),良性患者的中位随访时间为 56 个月。对于 WHO I-VII 级,整体 AROM(%)分别为 23、22、62、13、65、97 和 100;囊肿 AROM 分别为 7、0、19、13、38、78 和 100;实体 AROM 分别为 50、29、70、15、100、99 和 100。PSC I-VI 级的整体 AROM(%)分别为 23、29、64、0(IVa)、60(IVb)、97 和 100;囊肿 AROM 分别为 7、0、19、0、21、78 和 100;实体 AROM 分别为 50、35、73、0、92、99 和 100。囊肿(与实体)的相对风险差异,WHO 为 0.38,PSC 为 0.26。WHO 和 PSC 类别可分层预测总体生存率。

结论

囊性与实体病变类型对 AROM 影响显著,特别是对非诊断性(I 级)、良性(II 级)、非典型(III 级)和 WHO V 级病变。PSC 囊性和实体类型的 IV 级也具有相似的低 AROM。两种分类均对总体生存率进行了分层,包括新引入的 WHO IV 和 WHO V 类别。